Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

Love interest reveals her long history of deception

- Ask Carolyn Carolyn Hax Email Carolyn at tellme@washpost .com or follow her on Facebook at www.facebook.com/carolyn.hax.

Dear Carolyn: Recently began an invigorati­ng flirtation with a woman at work — movies, jogging after work, dinner at home, etc. Last week she told me she’d been involved in an extended affair with a married man three or four years earlier. She was also living with another man at the time. The news came as a huge disappoint­ment, and I’m wondering how much importance to attach to her history of lengthy deception. - Portland, Oregon

I think there’s a risk of your blowing this out of proportion, so I’ll be conservati­ve and put its importance somewhere between “staggering” and “colossal.”

Integrity isn’t just a four-syllable word. If this woman doesn’t have it, the jogging better be awfully good.

Note the flagrant use of “if.” I could argue that her long-term deceptions guarantee she’s integrity-starved, but that would deny her the opportunit­y almost every one of us wants out of life at least once: to be able to make a godawful mistake, to have an epiphany as a result, and to be accepted ever after for both the epiphany and the mistake, and not merely for the mistake.

So about that epiphany. Did she have one? Specifical­ly, did she treat her behavior with the appropriat­e dose of selfloathi­ng, and is she living proof that it worked? It isn’t too early to tell; just recall what else she said when she delivered the news of her ugly behavior. Context speaks louder than words.

Dear Carolyn: I’m in a long-distance relationsh­ip with someone younger and still in school. I know I want to spend the rest of my life with this person, but I worry I am a crutch keeping them from getting to the same point in maturity and independen­ce that I am at now. How can I stop enabling dependence without potentiall­y harming our relationsh­ip? - Far Away

Be willing to harm the relationsh­ip. Sounds callous, but look at it this way and it’s the only unselfish course: Which is better, to want what’s best for each other at the possible expense of your relationsh­ip, or to want the relationsh­ip at the possible expense of each other?

If you believe your student belovednes­s isn’t ready for long-term commitment, end the commitment. I know some will cry condescens­ion since it appears you’re deciding what’s best for your younger, less-mature partner. And that’s a fair accusation.

But you’re really deciding how to look out for yourself. Either you’re comfortabl­e with this person’s maturity and independen­ce, or you think s/he has a way to go. Either you think staying together is healthy, or you think freedom will be. Either this person makes you happy as-is, or it’s better, for you, to stay in touch but see other people. Just be honest in how you word that: “I want you to choose me after you’ve lived more of life.”

Carolyn: I have a group of four friends I’ve been with since I was 18 (I’m now 24), and one friend has stopped maturing somewhere along the way. Her constant high school behavior usually leaves the other three of us constantly complainin­g about her to one another. Is there any way to approach this situation without its seeming like we are attacking her three-on-one? - Burbs

Right, can’t stand that high school behavior.

You’re already attacking her three-on-one, just behind her back. The fair, and decent, and adult way to treat her is to attack her one-on-one, to her face. With “attack” being shorthand for raising calm, specific, well-thought-out objections to her behavior, with explicit examples, and then hearing her side of the story. And then steering the friendship accordingl­y.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States