Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

Was school aid cut by $1 billion?

- Tom Kertscher Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

Since shortly after Republican Scott Walker became governor in 2011, Democrats have claimed that he cut $1 billion or more in state funding for public schools.

Now, with Walker seeking a third term, the billion-dollar attacks are back.

One was made by Tony Evers, who, as state schools superinten­dent, would seem to be in a good position to know. Evers is one of a slew of Democrats hoping to win the August primary election in order to challenge Walker in November.

Evers was asked in a March 23 Wausau radio interview about a recent increase in funding Walker had approved for kindergart­en through 12th grade schools. Evers replied by saying:

In K through 12, I think it’s a one-year flash. Governor Walker has taken over a billion dollars from the public schools and it hasn’t been replaced. This year, a little bit of an anomaly...

Some of the other Democratic candidates for governor, including Mahlon Mitchell and Kelda Helen Roys, have made similar attacks.

There’s no question that, despite recent funding increases, Walker earlier made significan­t cuts to school funding.

But has Walker “taken” over $1 billion from public schools?

Not in the way most people would think of a funding cut.

Evers’ evidence

To back Evers’ statement, his campaign provided calculatio­ns of “total educationa­l cost” figures. They indicate school funding is down a total of more than $1 billion since 2010-’11 — the final state fiscal year under Walker’s predecesso­r, Democrat Jim Doyle.

But those figures count federal, state and local sources of school funding.

So, let’s go to a more direct measure — state money allocated in the state budget for K-12 schools.

State funding of schools

When we posed Evers’ claim to the nonpartisa­n state Legislativ­e Fiscal Bureau, the bureau provided us these GPR (general purpose revenue) figures. They include funding streams known as per-pupil aid, equalizati­on aid and other categorica­l aids.

The starting point is $5.27 billion — the amount of state funding for schools in 2010-’11, Doyle’s last year as governor. Think of that as the base.

The next year, 2011-’12, Walker used his first state budget to cut school funding by $426.5 million — that’s the actual reduction.

How to get to ‘over $1 billion’

Since making that cut, Walker has increased the amount of state aid to schools every year.

But it took awhile before state aid got back to the level it was under Doyle’s final year.

More specifical­ly, in Walker’s first five years, schools received a total of $1.17 billion less in state aid than if the funding had remained at the base level.

But if you carry that comparison forward to today, the amount “taken” is only $183.6 million.

Other factors

A final point.

While it’s clear that Walker’s first budget cut the $426.5 million, he also gave school districts the “tools,” with Act 10, to recoup their losses.

The law, which dramatical­ly reduced collective bargaining power for teachers and most public employees in Wisconsin, enabled school districts to save money by, for example, requiring

employees to pay for a greater share of their health insurance.

On the other hand, Walker also reduced how much money school districts could raise in property taxes. And that reduction, like the state funding for schools overall, hasn’t been fully restored —though school districts can ask voters in referendum­s to exceed the limits.

Our rating

Evers says that despite a recent increase in school funding, Walker “has taken over a billion dollars from the public schools.”

In Walker’s first year as governor, he cut school aid by $426.5 million from the previous year, Doyle’s final year as governor.

Because it took five years to get school funding back to that base level, it can be argued that Walker “took” a total of $1.17 billion from schools over that period.

But since then, Walker has increased school funding to the point that the deficit, in comparison to the base year, is $183.6 million.

For a statement that contains only an element of truth, our rating is Mostly False.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States