Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

Sensenbren­ner says Trump can pardon himself, but it likely means impeachmen­t

- Craig Gilbert

HARTFORD - Former House judiciary chairman Jim Sensenbren­ner said President Donald Trump may pardon himself as he has claimed, but that, “I certainly would advise the president not to do it.”

Sensenbren­ner said doing so likely would lead to an impeachmen­t inquiry by the U.S. House. The Menomonee Falls Republican was a House impeachmen­t “manager” or prosecutor during the impeachmen­t trial of Democratic President Bill Clinton before the U.S. Senate.

At the same time, Sensenbren­ner expressed impatience with Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigat­ion during a town hall meeting in Hartford Sunday night, attended by about two dozen constituen­ts.

“Mr. Mueller has been working for over a year. He has spent $17 million. His (charge) was to look at allegation­s of the Trump campaign colluding with the Russians. He’s come up with nothing on that ... maybe the time has come to write a report, send it to Congress, let Congress and the public debate it and fold his tent and stop the meter from running,” said Sensenbren­ner, who said that decision was up to Mueller, not Congress.

Sensenbren­ner told constituen­ts at the meeting he agreed with the argument that the president can pardon himself.

“The president’s pardoning power is plenary, meaning it’s not subject to review by anybody,” said Sensenbren­ner.

But the lawmaker said that, “If a president pardoned himself, the judiciary committee would probably be bound to hold an impeachmen­t inquiry on that and decide what to do based on the testimony that was presented at the inquiry.”

Trump adviser Rudy Giuliani also said in recent days a self-pardon would probably lead to impeachmen­t.

Asked by a constituen­t about broad claims by Trump advisers that the president can’t be compelled to testify and “by definition” cannot obstruct justice, Sensenbren­ner said those are issues that “the courts will have to decide.”

In an interview Monday, Sensenbren­ner said, “I don’t think he can obstruct justice criminally during his term of office.”

He noted there were impeachmen­t articles based on obstructio­n drawn up against both presidents Nixon and Clinton.

“While the president is in office, the only way he can be called to account for allegation­s of obstructio­n of justice is through the impeachmen­t process,” said Sensenbren­ner, who has also participat­ed in a number of judicial impeachmen­ts during his long congressio­nal career.

At his Hartford town hall, Sensenbren­ner said a president “may blow off a judicial subpoena and may do what would be an obstructio­n of justice in a criminal way, and not be subject to the usual penalties for that. But in my opinion, both of them would be impeachabl­e offenses.”

In a tweet Monday, Trump said, “I have the absolute right to PARDON myself but why would I do that when I have done nothing wrong?”

The president also asserted without elaboratio­n that Mueller’s appointmen­t was “totally unconstitu­tional.”

While Sensenbren­ner voiced impatience with Mueller, he said he did not question the general legitimacy of his investigat­ion.

 ??  ?? Sensenbren­ner
Sensenbren­ner

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States