Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

The walleye population may be able to rebound

- Outdoors Paul A. Smith Milwaukee Journal Sentinel USA TODAY NETWORK – WIS.

SPRINGSTEA­D - Under a cobalt summer sky, the surface of McDermott Lake reflected a thousand diamonds of light.

The lake’s clear waters produced in abundance, too.

“That’s 351 (young-of-theyear),” said Levi Feucht, a UWMadison student and fisheries intern, holding a tray of inch-long fish.

The yield, captured in about 24 hours in a single fyke net on the western shore of McDermott, was impressive.

But an examinatio­n of the species caught was truly jaw-dropping.

In a lake historical­ly dominated by walleyes, 350 of the recentlyha­tched fish were largemouth bass and one was a yellow perch.

That’s right - none was a walleye.

In fact, in more than a month of intensive work on the lake, researcher­s have found a grand total of zero young-of-the-year walleye.

The 2018 results are not an anomaly. They found none last year, too.

Walleye, a culturally, economical­ly and ecological­ly important fish, are in trouble across much of its native range in the Badger State as well as Minnesota.

The examples are numerous. Poor recruitmen­t led to a 5-year ban on walleye harvest on the Minocqua chain of lakes in Vilas County. It remains to be seen if the prized fish will bounce back.

And a virtual lack of young, naturally-reproduced walleye have been documented for the last decade on Lac Vieux Desert, a large waterbody that straddles the Wisconsin and Michigan border.

Researcher­s say the reasons for the walleye decline aren’t fully understood and are likely complex.

But recent studies have shown a link between higher water temperatur­es and reduced production of walleyes, a cool-water fish.

As largemouth bass have increased in northern lakes, it’s clear walleye numbers have dipped, too.

And the age-old preference of fishermen to keep walleyes remains high.

Fun to catch and unsurpasse­d as table fare, walleyes are the most-prized fish that swims in Wisconsin waters, according to angler surveys by the Department of Natural Resources. What’s more, the golden-flanked fish are harvested at a rate several times higher than largemouth bass.

It’s also known that walleye fry are preyed on by other species. A 1/2-inch-long walleye is a quick dinner for even a 3-inch largemouth or 4-inch bluegill.

With abundant bass and panfish population­s in many northern Wisconsin waters, it’s arguably never been tougher for recentlyha­tched walleyes to survive.

But there is much to learn about the dynamics of this predatorpr­ey relationsh­ip.

For example, is there a certain density of bass and panfish in a lake that flips the switch from a walleye-dominated to a bassdomina­ted system?

And, from a management perspectiv­e, could it be possible to reduce a bass and panfish population to a level that would allow walleyes to recover via natural reproducti­on?

The work on McDermott, led by researcher­s from the University of Wisconsin and UW-Stevens Point and the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, is looking at such questions.

In an audacious whole-lake experiment, bass and panfish are being removed.

The goal is to reduce the lake’s

population of centrarchi­ds (which includes largemouth bass, bluegill, pumkinseed sunfish, black crappie and rock bass) by 80%.

The effects on the lake, and principall­y the walleye population, will be studied over the next four years.

The universiti­es received a grant for the work from the U.S. Geological Survey.

Holly Embke, a graduate student at the UW Center for Limnology, is leading the field work.

“Interactio­ns between walleye and other fish may be playing a large role in the ability for walleye to maintain self-sustaining population­s,” Embke said. “This wholelake experiment will allow us to look at bass and panfish, especially, and any change in walleye recruitmen­t.”

The project falls under a principle called “safe operating space,” or SOS. The researcher­s hope to understand conditions needed to maintain self-sustaining walleye population­s and inform recreation­al fisheries management.

On a glorious summer day last week in the North Woods, Embke and four summer interns - Feucht, Matt Chotlos, Abbie Dalton and Keegan Epping - checked traps and nets on McDermott and recorded the catches.

Tiny largemouth bass outnumbere­d all other fish caught by a wide margin. Small bluegill (2 to 4 inches in length) were second.

The project started in 2017 with baseline work on McDermott as well as nearby Sandy Beach Lake, a reference lake.

McDermott had an adult walleye abundance of less than 1 per acre, very low for a lake that at one time featured a naturally-sustaining walleye population, and lots of bass and panfish.

This year the meat of the project - removal of bass and panfish has begun.

The researcher­s deploy more than a dozen clover traps and fyke nets around McDermott and check them daily. At least once a week fish are caught and removed by electrofis­hing, too.

All fish removed are donated to wildlife rehabilita­tion centers in Wisconsin.

McDermott, an 82-acre gem of a lake about 15 miles northeast of Park Falls, was selected because it historical­ly had a good, naturally reproducin­g walleye population but recently had changed to a bass-panfish dominated system.

In addition, the project was supported by local residents.

“I’m hoping it will help the walleyes,” said Gail Spranger, 65, who has lived on the lake for 21 years and has run a cabin rental there since 1993. “Most of our guests come here to fish.”

The lake remains open to public fishing, with unchanged regulation­s, during the project.

The most recent DNR fish assessment on McDermott was conducted in 2012. It found adequate spawning habitat for walleye, but had the “characteri­stics of a fishery in which walleye have

lost their predatory dominance to an increasing­ly abundant largemouth bass population.”

And the average bluegill captured was about 4 inches long. The high capture rate and small size structure of bluegill observed by DNR crews was indicative of an “overabunda­nt population,” according to the report.

The DNR has continued moderate walleye stocking in the lake, including 420 large fingerling walleye (6 to 8 inches in length) in 2013 and 409 in 2015.

The rest of the fish community includes muskellung­e, northern pike, white sucker, brown bullhead, yellow perch, spot-tail shiner, Johnny darter and a handful of other small species.

Impressive­ly, McDermott has no invasive animal or plant species.

As water temperatur­es have warmed into the 70s in much of the lake, plant growth is substantia­l. So much underwater habitat, so much room for small panfish to hide.

The prospect of removing even half of the bass and panfish from the lake is daunting.

A glance over the side of a boat last week revealed the movements of small fish, most likely hatched this year.

“It’s a good time to be a piscivore,” Embke said.

The abundant fish population benefits the walleyes that remain in McDermott, too. On one recent electrofis­hing outing, the researcher­s pumped the stomach of an adult walleye as part of their diet analysis. The fish was packed with young-of-the-year largemouth bass, Embke said.

Embke and the crew remain energized by the opportunit­ies and challenges of the project. It’s the largest effort ever undertaken to study the effects of bass and panfish removal on a walleye population, Embke said.

So far this year, the researcher­s have removed about 50,000 largemouth and panfish, Embke said.

And importantl­y, most of those caught and removed have been young-of-the-year, Embke said, potentiall­y helping to limit the 2018 year classes of bass and panfish and creating more “space” for walleyes.

Regardless of the removal success, many bass and panfish will remain in the lake.

The lowered bass and panfish population­s are likely to benefit the fishery no matter what the research finds, said Mike Vogelsang, DNR district fisheries supervisor in Woodruff.

“They’ll either have a better walleye fishery or a better bass and panfish fishery,” Vogelsang said. “The lake is dominated by stunted fish now.”

The project is scheduled to continue through 2022.

Solutions to the walleye decline may be as elusive as a 32-inch “gravel lizard.”

But research, like keeping a line in the water, is the only hope.

 ?? PAUL A. SMITH ?? Holly Embke (left), a University of Wisconsin graduate student and project leader of a northern Wisconsin study of interactio­ns between panfish, bass and walleyes, observes as project interns Levi Fuecht (center) and Abbie Dalton identify and count...
PAUL A. SMITH Holly Embke (left), a University of Wisconsin graduate student and project leader of a northern Wisconsin study of interactio­ns between panfish, bass and walleyes, observes as project interns Levi Fuecht (center) and Abbie Dalton identify and count...
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States