Judge won’t extend deadlines for feds to reunite families
A federal judge ordered the Trump administration on Tuesday to abide by an order to reunite dozens of children with their parents by the end of the day, turning down a Department of Justice request for more time.
U.S. District Judge Dana Sabraw, who ordered the administration to reunite nearly 3,000 children separated by federal immigration agents, asked an attorney for the ACLU to prepare a proposal for possible punishment if the government misses Tuesday’s deadline to reunite the first round of families.
“These are firm deadlines,” Sabraw said. “They’re not aspirational goals.”
Justice Department attorney Sarah Fabian said DNA tests that are being conducted on 16 parents and children to confirm they are indeed related could stretch into Wednesday. Sabraw didn’t budge.
“They need to respond,” he said. “They need to be ... aware of the deadlines. I expect these tasks would be provided today.”
The government faces two deadlines to reunite families that were separated by immigration agents, most under the Trump administration’s “zero tolerance” policy that went into full effect in recent months.
All children under age 5 must have been reunited by Tuesday, a group that includes about 100 children. Sabraw concluded that 63 of those must have been reunited by Tuesday.
The others have more complicated cases, including parents who might pose a threat to their child, those in state and federal prisons facing nonimmigration, criminal charges and 12 who have been removed from the country.
All other minors – close to 3,000 of them – must then be reunited by July 26.
Sabraw said he was encouraged to see the work done by various federal agencies who have been involved in detaining and reuniting parents and children who are spread out around the country. But he made clear that those deadlines will remain.
The only area where Sabraw provided some wiggle room for the administration is in cases where the parent has been deported.
He said those families must be reunited under his order, but acknowledged that those reunifications will take some time. He said he will lay out a plan for those reunions in the days to come.
Sabraw also allowed the government to use a quicker approach to reuniting families. The Department of Health and Human Services, which is responsible for the care of minors that have been separated, has been following guidelines established by Congress in 2000 before releasing any child from its custody.
Fabian explained that those requirements have slowed the government’s ability to quickly reunite parents with their children. The law – the Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act – requires background checks of sponsors, in-person checks of where the child would live, and a full screening of people who live in that home.
Sabraw ruled that the law was designed for unaccompanied minors – children caught crossing the border alone. And although he urged the government to look out for the best interest of each child it releases, he ruled that the government doesn’t have to follow every single step of the process established by the victims act.
“Everyone is rolling in the same direction here, it’s just a matter of streamlining the process,” he said.
That should come as a relief to the teams of attorneys and volunteers that have been assisting parents in a reunification process that got off to a difficult and complicated start.
Attorney Jennifer Rikoski, who has been volunteering to help migrants detained at the Port Isabel processing facility near Brownsville, Texas, characterized the reunion process as bureaucratic chaos.
“There’s no one taking ownership from a case management perspective of each family,” said Rikoski, a Bostonbased lawyer who volunteered out of sense of duty to the legal system. “My sense is that people are so compartmentalized that no one knows what the right next step is.”