Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

City moves to impound scooters

But council urges state to legalize the devices

- Elena Weissmann and Mary Spicuzza

Don’t call it a ban.

But Bird scooters could soon be impounded by the city under an ordinance approved overwhelmi­ngly Tuesday by the Milwaukee Common Council and signed by Mayor Tom Barrett.

This means the city can legally impound scooters and Bird will need to pay $100 each to recover them. But residents will likely not be fined for riding any scooters left out on the streets, so long as they do not drive recklessly.

Language directly prohibitin­g motorized scooters was removed from the city’s ordinance under a last-minute move by Barrett and Ald. Bob Bauman, the plan’s sponsor.

The “softening up” of language appears to serve two functions: to shift the focus of the Bird dispute from the city to the state, and to allow for legal use of the scooters in Milwaukee should the state take action.

Bauman said the language changes in the ordinance were “basically to make it sound less harsh — the effect is the same.”

He insisted he has no problems with scooters in general — and may even try riding them if they become legal.

“We’re not anti-scooter. We’re in favor of enforcing laws in a fair and equitable manner,” Bauman said. “Personally, I have no problem with motorized scooters. I have a problem with a company that basically ignores the city’s role as a referee of the public right of way, and just comes in here and does things without any discussion, any forewarnin­g.”

Barrett and Bauman stressed that the scooters are illegal under state law, and it’s up to the state, not the city, to legalize them.

The scooters could become legal if the Legislatur­e or state officials take action. The council also unanimousl­y passed a resolution Tuesday urging the state to legalize scooters, signaling their willingnes­s to give the scooters a chance.

In response to the Common Council’s move, a Bird spokespers­on maintained the scooters were legal under federal law.

“The City of Milwaukee passed an ordinance today giving local law enforcemen­t authority to impound escooters being operated as ‘motor vehicles’ based on an interpreta­tion of state law,” the spokespers­on wrote. “However, the Federal Government motor vehicle safety regulator NHTSA has affirmativ­ely stated that scooters like those offered by Bird are not ‘motor vehicles.’ ”

The statement continued, “We look forward to continuing our work with the City of Milwaukee and the State of Wisconsin to resolve this matter and provide the people of Wisconsin our clean energy solution for short distance trips.”

The immediate response to the city measure was confusion over how aggressive­ly it would be enforced.

The proposal passed on a 12 to 2 vote. Alds. Tony Zielinski and Khalif Rainey voted against the measure, with Zielinski raising concerns over how the city responded to Bird representa­tives.

“My understand­ing is that Bird attended a Public Works Committee meeting to speak ... (and) they were not afforded the opportunit­y to do so,” said Zielinski, a 2020 mayoral candidate.

“We should have open communicat­ion with the company,” he added. “It’s critical that we have a transparen­t, open government system.”

Bird fans chirp their protest

About a dozen protesters showed up at City Hall in support of Bird scooters.

Led by two Bird representa­tives, they held up colorful posters outside City Hall and chanted, “Don’t ban Bird!” and “Save our scooters!”

Brothers Borna and Sina Riazi, who live in Menomonee Falls, were among the Bird supporters.

Borna, 19, called them an efficient way to get to work, and added that he likes riding them with friends.

A path to legality

During a news conference after Tuesday’s vote, Barrett called on the state to make motorized scooters like Bird legal.

“There is an issue here, and the issue is the state law,” Barrett said. “The (ordinance) that I will sign today makes it clear that we want to see the state law change.

“If they are legal, we want them to be here in the city of Milwaukee,” he added. “I think it’s exciting that we’ve got many forms of transporta­tion. I love buses, I love the streetcar, I love the Bublr bikes, and I think I’ll fall in love with the scooters as well.”

Aldermen have raised safety concerns as well as legality issues. If someone was injured while riding one of the scooters, it’s not clear who would be held responsibl­e — Bird, the rider or the city.

The word on Bird

Deputy City Attorney Adam Stephens issued Bird a cease-and-desist letter June 28, just days after they began operations. When Bird refused to budge, Stephens responded by filing a lawsuit against the scooter-share company July 6.

In the lawsuit, Stephensar­gues the scooters are illegal under state law and the city is powerless to legalize their use.

Bird scooters have provoked similar responses from cities around the country, including San Francisco, Nashville, Tennessee, Miami and Denver.

As in most of these cities and despite legal conflict, Milwaukee residents have demonstrat­ed an overwhelmi­ngly positive response to the scooters. People can be seen zipping all around the city on the small black scooters — along Lake Michigan, through downtown and even in certain suburbs, like Shorewood.

 ?? MIKE DE SISTI/MILWAUKEE JOURNAL SENTINEL ?? About a dozen protestors showed up in support of Bird scooters at a Milwaukee Common Council meeting where it was decided that the city could impound the scooters.
MIKE DE SISTI/MILWAUKEE JOURNAL SENTINEL About a dozen protestors showed up in support of Bird scooters at a Milwaukee Common Council meeting where it was decided that the city could impound the scooters.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States