Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

Democratic gains could improve House prospects for a decade,

Congressio­nal districts to be redrawn in 2021

- Gregory Korte USA TODAY

Tuesday’s election results gave Democrats control of the House of Representa­tives for at least the next two years. But their success elsewhere on the ballot puts them in a better position to control it for the next decade after that.

With Democratic candidates for governor and state lawmaker winning in several key states, the party broke Republican monopolies that redrew the political maps after the 2010 census — maps that have given the GOP an advantage in congressio­nal elections in the years since.

On Tuesday, Democrats picked up full control of state government­s in Colorado, Illinois, Maine, New Mexico, New York and Nevada.

In several states where Republican­s held full control — Kansas, Michigan, New Hampshire and Wisconsin — they will now share power with Democrats.

Most of those states will hold state legislativ­e elections again in 2020. But Democratic wins this year will strengthen their hand when states face the oncea-decade task of redrawing the congressio­nal district lines in 2021.

Elsewhere, voters approved ballot initiative­s aimed at reforming redistrict­ing by taking it out of the hands of politician­s. Michigan, Colorado and Missouri all passed redistrict­ing proposals. A fourth initiative, in Utah, appears to be passing narrowly.

“The Republican­s are on notice that the playing field and the rules will be different after 2020,” said Jeffrey Wice, a Democratic redistrict­ing attorney.

Republican­s are not conceding anything. No matter who draws the maps, they say, Democrats still have yet to prove they can consistent­ly win elections outside major cities.

The GOP still controls 62 of 99 state legislativ­e chambers (every state has two houses in their legislatur­e except Nebraska), and the Democratic gains Tuesday were in states that Hillary Clinton won in 2016.

“They have not shown an ability to get beyond their base states and get into purple states — much less red states,” said Matt Walter, president of the Republican State Leadership Committee. “They’re only talking about redistrict­ing as an excuse for their failure to run good candidates and win elections.”

Still, Democrats made progress on Tuesday.

They picked up seven governorsh­ips, including in the gerrymande­red battlegrou­nd of Wisconsin. While Republican­s solidified their control the Wisconsin legislatur­e, Democrat Tony Evers will be able to use his veto on Republican-drawn maps.

Other Democratic governor pickups were in Illinois, Kansas, Maine, Michigan, Nevada and New Mexico.

In Minnesota, the Democratic-Farmer-Labor party took control of the House of Representa­tives, giving it a stronger hand in redistrict­ing.

Democrats also took back a legislativ­e chamber in Colorado, Connecticu­t, Maine and New York — potentiall­y giving them monopoly power over drawing maps in those states. In New Hampshire, they took back both chambers.

In Michigan and Pennsylvan­ia, Democrats broke Republican super-majorities in the state Senates. That’s important because it will allow them to sustain vetoes from their Democratic governors.

“It’s a long game, but we gained a lot of yardage,” said Kelly Ward, executive director of the Democratic National

Redistrict­ing Committee. “Now we have the real potential of a one-two punch of 2018 plus 2020 — to take these gains and continue them in a presidenti­al election year.”

Most governors are elected to four-year terms, so the winners Tuesday will be in office when maps are redrawn in 2021. But most state legislatur­es will have more elections in 2020, giving the parties one more round to fight at the ballot box.

Until then, the battle over redistrict­ing will shift to courtrooms around the country.

Democratic groups are challengin­g a Census Bureau decision to include a citizenshi­p question on the 2020 census form. They say it’s meant to discourage immigrants from standing up to be counted.

The 10-year population tally begins the process of drawing political maps across the country. First, the 435 congressio­nal seats are allocated among the states based on their population. Then the states draw districts, making sure each has roughly the same population.

In drawing their maps, the states also have to comply with the Voting Rights Act, state constituti­onal provisions and a growing number of state and federal court rulings.

Just this week, a federal court struck down Maryland’s congressio­nal map as an unconstitu­tional gerrymande­r.

How big of a difference do court-drawn maps make?

Across the Mason-Dixon Line in Pennsylvan­ia, Democrats had been unable to beat a single incumbent Republican congressma­n in a general election since 2010.

That changed after the Pennsylvan­ia Supreme court struck down the Republican-drawn map this year and drew its own.

On Tuesday, four Democrats – all women – won districts in suburban Philadelph­ia, flipping them from red to blue and breaking up what had been an all-male Pennsylvan­ia congressio­nal delegation.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States