Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

Husband’s twin sister crosses lines

-

Dear Carolyn: I’m expecting our first child. Since we announced my pregnancy, my husband’s twin sister has treated all baby decisions as joint decisions between her, my husband, and me — everything from the brand of prenatal vitamins I use to circumcisi­on to baby names to car seats.

For the 20-week appointmen­t, we invited our mothers to see the ultrasound. Sister came along as well. When I was making my next appointmen­t, she wrote it down as if she planned to attend.

At first, I just said neutral things like, “Thanks for the tip/article, we will consider it.” Her intentions are very good and we don’t want to hurt her feelings, but my husband and I both feel a little smothered and I definitely don’t want her in the delivery room. How can we address this? Oh my, no.

There’s never a bad time to set a good boundary, but sooner is always better. I realize shouldas are evil, but many see babies as invitation­s to get up in your business as far as you’ll let them, so rethinking your choices will be useful for this future. Apply this shoulda hereafter: Nip intrusions early.

I am a huge fan of your neutral deflection­s, but when the lines are crossed this far, firmer limits are necessary.

Coming along on the appointmen­t uninvited, for example — that was a time for your husband (the better messenger here) to talk to his sister. Each vitamincar-seats-circumcisi­on discussion is minor, but in aggregate they represent both a serious problem and missed opportunit­ies to catch it early. “Sis, you’ll be such a great auntie. But I’m not comfortabl­e opening up our decisions to family review like this.”

Since she’s giving you so many opportunit­ies, you might accomplish more with Small Talk(s) versus a Big one. Meaning, one of you responds in the moment to one of the big boundary crossings — “Thanks, but this decision is between us” — then you wait to see if your message gets: (a) ignored; (b) received, but applied in this one instance; (c) received and applied widely.

If (c), then, yay. You’re done. If you get (a) or (b), then set a firmer boundary at the next opportunit­y and see where it goes. If she gets upset, then it’s time for the full-clarificat­ion, we-love-you-as-asib-and-auntie, Big Talk: No third parents, please.

Re: Twin: My husband is very close to his sister, who’s a veteran mom, so he spent several months assuming I appreciate­d all his sister’s input — when I really wanted to experience being a first-time mom, including the clueless decisions and mistakes, without being constantly reminded that someone else knew better than I did. My husband was shocked to hear this, but quickly reversed his approach once I found the words to say so. Good luck!

Congratula­tions! On the baby, and on finding the words, and to your husband for being willing to pivot like that.

Find Carolyn at tellme@washpost.com, on Facebook at www.facebook.com/carolyn.hax and at noon Eastern time Friday at protect-us.mimecast.com/s/XIokCpYoJQ­hnnjn05cPO­QOR?domain=washington­post.com.

 ?? Carolyn Hax ??
Carolyn Hax

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States