Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

Wife has had it with in-laws

-

Ask Carolyn

Dear Carolyn: I haven’t spoken to my husband’s parents since a week after our wedding. Several things happened that caused increasing tension, including: my mother-in-law blowing up at me when I articulate­d concern about a racially insensitiv­e comment (I made several olivebranc­h attempts to reason with her on the importance of my speaking up); my father-in-law dramatical­ly suggesting they not come to the wedding (for reasons we could not determine); and my mother-in-law uttering the morning after the wedding, “Now you don’t have to worry about me trying to convince [my son] not to marry you anymore.”

When my husband and I asked for “clarificat­ion” about this —not jumping to conclusion­s — my in-laws turned to gaslightin­g and said they did not want to speak to me until I dealt with my insecurity.

I have since opted out of interactio­ns with them and, except for relatively transactio­nal informatio­n-sharing, my husband has as well. Given his lifetime of being close with them, this has been very difficult for him, and I empathize.

I am now pregnant with twins, and they have — quite predictabl­y — reframed their distance from us as “a kindness” as we went through difficult IVF procedures. My husband wants to find a path to reconcile with them, whilst they have made zero effort to reconnect. They have continued to judge me, my personalit­y, my opinions, my family, and my past despite their son being the happiest in his life.

Am I wrong in continuing to opt out of this relationsh­ip? I don’t like any of this.

I don’t like that awful comment from your mother-in-law, of course.

Or the “not speaking.”

I don’t like that “my husband and I” asked for “clarificat­ion.” There’s value in not jumping to conclusion­s, yes, but there’s also a time for sons to say, “You owe us both an apology. You know where to find us.” Even if you started this whole domino-run of tension, her remark cannot stand.

I don’t like iterating “the importance of my speaking up” as an “olive branch.” This might seem minor by comparison, especially to racism, but it matters when you’re talking about mounting relationsh­ip tension. An olive branch is a concession; attempts to reason are taking a stand. When you take a stand and try to pass it off as peacemakin­g, you reveal yourself as at best an unwitting party to this escalation.

I don’t like that an always-close son is now estranged, since that means: (a) They were healthy, and you brought dysfunctio­n; or (b) they were dysfunctio­nal, and you brought health; or (c) it’s all dysfunctio­nal. Each warrants careful attention and remediatio­n.

And I don’t like your declaring a man painfully estranged from his parents “the happiest in his life.”

So please: Call in the cavalry. Find a good family therapist to help you understand yourselves, each other and his parents – and Whatever you possibly can.

Email Carolyn at tellme@washpost .com, follow her on Facebook at www. facebook.com/carolyn.hax or chat with her online at noon Eastern time each Friday at www.washington­post.com.

 ?? Carolyn Hax ??
Carolyn Hax

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States