Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

Diet demand jeopardize­s holiday feast

- Carolyn Hax

Dear Carolyn: I am in an OOD (Obsessive Organic Disagreeme­nt) with my daughter-in-law and her husband — my son. Three families are coming to my house for the holiday. The OOD couple decided not to join us if everyone didn’t contribute dishes made from foods labeled “organic.”

The OOD couple have three preschool children. They buy only organic foods, and dine at cafes of all-organic grocery stores. Otherwise, they bring organic food and beverages for the children. Letting them bring their own organic-labeled foods for holidays hasn’t worked well. My daughter-in-law brought so many vegetables for a cookout that she monopolize­d the entire grill cooking them. They proceeded to eat dinner as we had just gained access to the grill.

I was brought up that if someone invited you for dinner, you ate what you liked of what was served.

Would it poison the OOD family to eat one meal that was “regular” food? – OOD Grandmothe­r

Being right doesn’t do you much good if you’re answering the wrong questions.

Of course these kids could safely eat one “regular” meal.

And yes, etiquette tilts heavily toward gracious acceptance of whatever hosts choose to serve, although allergies and other intoleranc­es can politely factor in.

And, organic? Sure. Their prerogativ­e, though it’s an imprecise business at best.

But this isn’t about food or manners. It’s about fanaticism.

Your daughter-in-law —she’s the driver here, I gather, while your son is the passenger? — is an extremist. Extremism is psychologi­cal, not dietary.

This is also more of a hostage situation than a menu challenge. Your access to your son and grandchild­ren lies behind that “OOD” gate.

So, sure, you can fulminate eternally over impure coffee about your daughterin-law’s food sanctimony, with full justificat­ion and no doubt ample validation from those other families, your friends, and people like me — but your son and grandkids won’t be there. And that’s the thing you want, isn’t it? Not winning, but companions­hip?

If it’s winning, then that would explain what your son sees in your daughter-inlaw. Righteousn­ess as emotional comfort zone.

But if you do want your son and grandkids there, then you need to stop trying to reason with — or, perhaps more aptly, harrumph your way to triumph over — the fanatic. You just need to meet her terms.

Obviously that’s not ideal. It feels like bootlickin­g.

It’s merely an extreme version of what we all have to do, though, always, to interact with other people. You don’t choose what other people believe or stand for or request of us. We can only choose from the options we’re given. In this case: Fight your daughter-in-law over food, or celebrate with your son and grandkids.

Rarely is the grovel barrier so low as just cooking organic food.I say do it and zip it – before she raises the bar.

Email Carolyn at tellme@washpost.com, follow her on Facebook at www.facebook.com/carolyn.hax or chat with her online at noon Eastern time each Friday at www.washington­post.com.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States