Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

Limits on late nights failed

- D.L. Davis

With a change in power in the governor’s office coming in January, Wisconsin’s lame-duck session last week was interestin­g.

To say the least.

The Republican-controlled Legislatur­e passed several measures that limit the powers of Democratic Gov.-elect Tony Evers and incoming Attorney General Josh Kaul, also a Democrat. Gov. Scott Walker has signaled he supports the changes, though he is being lobbied heavily to reject some or all of them.

Republican leaders say the moves were aimed at better balancing the power between the legislativ­e and executive branches. A Washington Post opinion piece called Republican­s’ postelecti­on strategy “thievery.” Evers labeled it “a hot mess.”

Here, we are not looking at what was done.

Rather, we are looking at how it was done.

Specifical­ly, whether the process — the initial legislatio­n released late on a Friday, a committee vote on the next Monday and Tuesday-into-Wednesday final passage — is consistent with a 2013 agreement that was aimed at avoiding rushed votes.

As we have done a few times in recent days, we’ll use the Flip-O-Meter, which examines whether elected officials or others have been consistent on an issue over time.

We’ll look at Assembly Speaker Robin Vos, R-Rochester, since he was an architect of the 2013 agreement and, among other things, has final word on Assembly schedules.

While you were sleeping

Although GOP leaders released an initial version of their plans on Nov. 30, things kept changing in the days — even hours — until the final votes early on Dec. 5.

Republican­s spent much of the night working behind closed doors and unveiled a modified version of their legislatio­n around 4 a.m.

Senators passed the legislatio­n 17-16, with Republican Sen. Rob Cowles of Green Bay joining Democrats in opposing the legislatio­n. The Assembly passed the measure 56-27 along party lines.

The final vote came at 8:20 a.m. As reported Dec. 5 by the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, it was the latest session for the Senate since 1995, when it deliberate­d over the legislatio­n to build Miller Park, according to Senate Chief Clerk Jeff Renk.

“Not a way to run a government,” state Sen. Dave Hansen, D-Green Bay, said when the new legislatio­n was released.

For most of the early-morning hours, rank-and-file members from both parties

were in the dark about what would be taken up.

“We’ve had 132 legislator­s milling around this building for a day. And night. And morning,” Senate Minority Leader Jennifer Shilling of La Crosse said, while unsuccessf­ully pushing to recess until lawmakers could get some sleep.

The 2013 agreement

State Assembly leaders from both parties struck a deal in January 2013 to cut down on their body’s frequent and contentiou­s overnight sessions, with time clocks installed to track the length of future floor speeches.

“We are going to stop all-night sessions; that is the reason we got together and made this agreement,” Vos said at a news conference with Democratic leaders.

“We think it’ll be the exception rather than the rule and maybe it won’t happen at all this session,” Minority Leader Peter Barca, D-Kenosha, said of overnight sessions.

How it played out

The 2013 agreement had several specific provisions. Here’s a look at how they played out during the lame-duck session (sometimes referred to as an “extraordin­ary session”).

In 2013, lawmakers said they would meet before each Assembly session to set time limits on debate for each bill. In 2018, there was no agreement for time limits for the special session.

In 2013, lawmakers vowed to strictly follow the scheduled start time. In the 2018 session, the start time was supposed to be 1 p.m., but lawmakers didn’t start until hours later.

In 2013, lawmakers planned to have private caucus meetings between the members of each party in advance. In 2018, they did do that, but also met in caucus after the official start time.

In 2013, the plan was to minimize the number of contentiou­s bills on any session day and ensure a minimum of 30 minutes of debate on the final vote on each bill unless leaders of both parties agree otherwise. In 2018, lawmakers appeared to adhere to this, as there was no complaint from Democrats of debate getting cut off early.

In 2013, the aim of the new rules was to end debate by a “reasonable time” each session day, though there was no curfew set for debate as Democrats had sought.

In 2018, no one could claim the latest session ended at a “reasonable” time, since a 4 a.m. bill unveiling and an 8:20 a.m. vote are not reasonable hours.

Weighing in on how it played out

Aaron Collins, communicat­ions director for Assembly Democratic Leader Gordon Hintz of Oshkosh, noted “Republican leadership didn’t come to the floor until 10:30 p.m. and we adjourned at approximat­ely 8:30 a.m. That is the definition of an all-night session.”

He argued Republican­s had “completely flip-flopped on their earlier pledge.”

But the agreement did not outright ban overnight sessions. Even Barca, the Democratic leader at the time, said when the plan was unveiled that “we think it’ll be the exception rather than the rule.”

Meanwhile, Vos communicat­ions director Kit Beyer said the agreement amounted to a “memorandum of understand­ing.”

“The MOU allows both parties to discuss and agree to debate times,” she said. “Every effort was made to establish debate times for the extraordin­ary session. The Assembly Majority Leader Jim Steineke met with Democratic leaders on two occasions, but Democrats would not offer any time frame for debate or enter into that discussion.”

Our rating

In 2013, state Assembly leaders from both parties struck a deal to cut down on their body’s frequent and contentiou­s overnight sessions.

Vos did say “we are going to stop allnight sessions,” but from the context at the time — including statements by Democratic leadership — it’s clear it was not a ban, but an agreed-upon goal.

That said, there were many other parts of the agreement aimed at ensuring key issues would be debated fully and in the public eye — and not while most constituen­ts are sleeping. The Assembly fell far short of that. The final wording of the bills that passed was unveiled around 4 a.m. Less than five hours later, it was all headed to Walker’s desk.

We see that as a Full Flop.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States