Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

Johnson skims over facts of school milk decline

- Eric Litke

Representi­ng the dairy state in Washington, D.C., U.S. Sen Ron Johnson is proposing a bill to allow schools to return to serving higher-fat milks.

Making his case on Facebook, the Republican tied the drop in student milk consumptio­n to the focus on lowfat milks.

“Schools have not been able to serve whole milk or 2% since Obama-era regulation­s went into place,” Johnson wrote in a June 12 post. “As a result, milk consumptio­n has notably declined in schools across the country.”

Is Johnson right to blame the federal policies for decreasing student interest in milk?

Milk policy changes

Until eight years ago, schools served white milk at four fat levels (skim, 1%, 2% and whole) and flavored milk at three fat levels (skim, 1% and 2%).

That changed when the U.S. Department of Agricultur­e took the higher fat options off the table as part of an overall push to reduce fat intake in school lunches.

The Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act passed by Congress in 2010 changed nutritiona­l standards for school lunches. Policies implemente­d by the USDA by 2012 then banned whole and 2% white milk, as well as 1% and 2% flavored milk. That limited students’ milk options to flavored skim, white skim or white 1% until 2017.

Those regulation­s have loosened the last few years.

Congress allowed schools to offer 1% flavored milk if they could demonstrat­e “operationa­l hardship” to their state agency in the 2017-18 school year, and in 2018-19 they were able to offer the 1% flavored milk without a waiver, according to the USDA.

Johnson’s Milk in Lunches for Kids (MILK) Act would allow schools to serve any form of milk.

Assigning blame

Johnson’s main point is that the policy changes have caused a drop in student

milk consumptio­n.

It’s a classic question of correlatio­n versus causation — did both things simply happen at the same time, or are they related?

Milk consumptio­n isn’t just a schools issue. It has steadily dropped nationwide (a key element of the crisis facing Wisconsin dairy farmers). Percapita consumptio­n of fluid milk (not counting cheese and other dairy products) dropped from 247 pounds in 1975 to 149 pounds in 2017, according to the USDA.

So we would expect schools — which account for about 8% of all milk consumptio­n — to generally follow this trend.

Indeed, from 2008 to 2018, the weekly milk consumptio­n per student dropped from 4.03 bottles of milk (8 ounces each) to 3.39 bottles, according to an analysis by Prime Consulting Group on behalf of MilkPEP, a dairy industry group.

But student milk consumptio­n dropped much quicker after the higher fat milk options disappeare­d. The milk usage dropped an average of 0.03 milks per year from 2008 to 2012, then an average of 0.13 milks from 2013 to 2018.

Doug Adams, president of the Prime Group, said the numbers are based on school enrollment and milk distributi­on data provided by milk processors. The firm gathers actual data for about 80% of schools nationwide and uses

statistica­l methods to project the remaining portion.

Adams said the reduced fat level is a factor in the lower student consumptio­n, but just one of several.

For instance, he said, a new requiremen­t that every meal have a fruit or vegetable changed how often lunch staffers added milk to students’ trays.

As students go through lunch lines, they are required to have taken three of five components (meat, vegetable, fruit, grain/bread and milk) to qualify for government-funded meals. In the past, milk was the long-standing default add-on for students who were one item short. Now, with fruits or veggies required, those who arrive at the end short an item are often sent back to get those. That leaves out milk.

Meanwhile, the federal government also began requiring water be provided for free. Since water containers are sometimes displayed alongside milk in the lunch line, this increased the options available to students and therefore lowered milk consumptio­n.

The group also noted school lunch participat­ion has dropped overall. And fewer lunches mean less milk.

Our ruling

Johnson said the Obama-era removal of whole milk and 2% options led to a “notable decline” in school milk consumptio­n.

Milk consumptio­n has notably declined in schools, but it has declined across all age groups nationwide.

And the leading industry group studying this topic — which Johnson’s staff pointed to in defense of his claim — said the changes in milk availabili­ty are just one of several factors in the drop in student milk consumptio­n.

For a statement that is partially accurate but leaves out important details or takes things out of context, our rating is Half True.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States