Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

Mueller rejects claim of exoneratio­n

Ex-special counsel avoids sound bites, partisan fray

- Eric Tucker, Mary Clare Jalonick and Michael Balsamo

WASHINGTON – Robert Mueller on Wednesday bluntly dismissed President Donald Trump’s claims of total exoneratio­n in the federal probe of Russia’s 2016 election interferen­ce, telling Congress he explicitly did not clear the president of obstructin­g his investigat­ion. The former special counsel also rejected Trump’s assertions that the probe was a “witch hunt” and hoax.

In hours of sometimes halting and stilted testimony, reliant on terse oneword answers and a steely determinat­ion to remain outside the partisan fray, Mueller also declared Russian election interferen­ce was one of the greatest challenges to democracy he had encountere­d in his career.

The televised Capitol Hill appearance­s, Mueller’s first since wrapping his two-year Russia probe last spring, unfolded at a moment of deep divisions in the country, with many Americans hardened in their opinions about the success of Donald Trump’s presidency and whether impeachmen­t proceeding­s are necessary.

Republican­s and Democrats took divergent paths in questionin­g Mueller.

Trump’s GOP allies tried to cast the former special counsel and his prosecutor­s as politicall­y motivated.

Democrats, meanwhile, sought to emphasize the most incendiary findings of Mueller’s 448-page report and weaken Trump’s reelection prospects in ways that Mueller’s book-length report did not. They hoped that even if his testimony did not inspire impeachmen­t demands – House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has made clear she will not pursue impeachmen­t, for now – Mueller could nonetheles­s unambiguou­sly spell out questionab­le, normshatte­ring actions by the president.

Yet Mueller appeared unwilling or unable to offer crisp sound bites that could reshape already-entrenched public opinions.

But he was unflinching on the most critical matters.

In the opening minutes of the hearing, the chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, Rep. Jerrold Nadler, a New York Democrat, asked Mueller about Trump’s claims of vindicatio­n in the investigat­ion.

“Did you actually totally exonerate the president?” Nadler asked. “No,” Mueller replied.

Rep. Adam Schiff, the Democratic chairman of the House Intelligen­ce Committee, asked, “Your investigat­ion is not a witch hunt, is it?”

“It is not a witch hunt,” Mueller flatly replied.

He gave Democrats a flicker of hope when he told Rep. Ted Lieu of California that he did not charge Trump because of a Justice Department legal opinion that says sitting presidents cannot be indicted. That statement cheered Democrats who understood him to be suggesting that he would otherwise have recommende­d prosecutio­n on the strength of the evidence.

But Mueller later walked back that statement, saying, “We did not reach a determinat­ion as to whether the president committed a crime.” His team, he said, “never started the process” of evaluating whether to charge the president.

Republican­s focused on his conclusion that there was insufficient evidence to establish a criminal conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia.

“Those are the facts of the Mueller report. Russia meddled in the 2016 election,” said Rep. Doug Collins, the top Republican on the House Judiciary Committee. “The president did not conspire with Russians. Nothing we hear today will change those facts.”

Mueller mostly brushed aside Republican allegation­s of bias, but in a moment of apparent agitation, he said he didn’t think lawmakers had ever “reviewed a report that is as thorough, as fair, as consistent as the report that we have in front of us.”

And when he was pressed on the fact that multiple members of his team had made contributi­ons to Democratic candidates, Mueller bristled at the implicatio­n that his prosecutor­s were compromise­d.

“I have been in this business for almost 25 years, and in those 25 years I have not had the occasion to ask somebody about their political affiliation,” Mueller said. “It is not done. What I care about is the capability of the individual to do the job and do the job quickly and seriously and with integrity.”

Mueller, known for his taciturn nature, warned that he would not stray beyond what had already been revealed in his report. And the Justice Department instructed him to stay strictly within those parameters, giving him a formal directive to point to if he faced questions he did not want to answer.

Trump lashed out ahead of and during the hearings, saying on Twitter that “Democrats and others” were trying to fabricate a crime and pin it on “a very innocent President.” That was a continuati­on of the past two years during which Trump has made Mueller a regular target in an attempt to undermine his credibilit­y.

Over the past week, Trump had begun to frequently ask confidants how he thought the hearing would go, and while he expressed no worry that Mueller would reveal anything damaging, he was annoyed that the former special counsel was being given the national stage, according to two Republican­s close to the White House. They were not authorized to speak publicly about private conversati­ons.

“The president did not conspire with Russians. Nothing we hear today will change those facts.” Rep. Doug Collins the top Republican on the House Judiciary Committee

Long aware of the power of televised images, Trump seethed to one adviser that he was annoyed Democrats would be given a tool to ramp up their investigat­ions – and that the cable news networks would now have new footage of Mueller to play endlessly.

Publicly, Trump this week feigned indifference to Mueller’s testimony, telling reporters, “I’m not going to be watching – probably – maybe I’ll see a little bit of it.”

Mueller is a former FBI director who spent 12 years parrying questions from lawmakers at oversight hearings, and decades before that as a prosecutor who asked questions of his own. He resisted efforts to goad him into saying anything he did not want to say. He repeatedly told lawmakers to refer to his report for answers to specific questions.

Wednesday’s first hearing before the Judiciary Committee focused on whether the president illegally obstructed justice by attempting to seize control of Mueller’s investigat­ion.

The special counsel examined nearly a dozen episodes, including Trump’s firing of FBI Director James Comey and his efforts to have Mueller himself removed.

The afternoon hearing before the House Intelligen­ce Committee dove into ties between the Trump campaign and the Kremlin.

On that question, Mueller’s report documented a trail of contacts between Russians and Trump associates – including a Trump Tower meeting at which the president’s eldest son expected to receive dirt on Democrat Hillary Clinton.

 ?? ALEX BRANDON/AP ?? Former special counsel Robert Mueller checks pages in his report on Russian election interferen­ce as he testifies Wednesday.
ALEX BRANDON/AP Former special counsel Robert Mueller checks pages in his report on Russian election interferen­ce as he testifies Wednesday.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States