Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

Study: 32 of 35 rural wells contaminat­ed with feces

- Lee Bergquist

As worries grow over contaminat­ion of rural drinking water, a new study of private wells in southweste­rn Wisconsin found the overwhelmi­ng majority were contaminat­ed with fecal matter.

Results from the independen­t study released on Thursday showed that 32 of 35 wells — or 91% — contained fecal matter from humans or livestock.

Also detected in some of the wells in April during testing were illness-causing pathogens such as salmonella, rotavirus and cryptospor­idium.

The results from Grant, Iowa and Lafayette counties are the latest in a series of tests showing an array of problems with well water in the three counties.

These findings, and test results elsewhere, highlight the potential vulnerabil­ity of Wisconsin groundwate­r from agricultur­al practices and defective septic systems.

About one-quarter of the state’s residents get their water from more than 800,000 private wells, according to state figures.

“As a researcher of groundwate­r for 25 years now, I continue to be amazed by the level of fecal contaminat­ion in Wisconsin groundwate­r,” said Mark Borchardt, a research microbiolo­gist for the U.S. Agricultur­al Research Service.

The work was conducted by Borchardt, others in his agency and the Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey. Financial support came from the counties, the agencies and local groups. More testing in the counties is expected, with the next round in early August.

Groundwate­r attracts attention

On Wednesday, Democratic Gov. Tony Evers proposed new regulation­s aimed at farmers and their use of manure and fertilizer. The regulation­s would target regions that are susceptibl­e to nitrates — another source of groundwate­r pollution.

Those measures will need approval by the Republican-controlled Legislatur­e.

In the meantime, underscori­ng the heightened attention to groundwate­r, Assembly Speaker Robin Vos, R-Rochester, created a water quality task force in February and has been holding hearings across the state.

Vos formed the legislativ­e task force after Borchardt’s group released the results from an initial round of testing in the three counties.

In those tests from November 2018 and April, 42% of 840 wells had evidence of contaminat­ed groundwate­r: total coliform and E. coli, which are bacteria, and nitrates.

The region draws groundwate­r from fractured dolomite, a type of limestone, which can lead to contaminan­ts seeping into water-bearing rock.

In the latest study, tests found contaminat­ion from human waste and septic systems in 30 of the 35 wells.

Contaminat­ion in 17 of the wells was from cattle and five from swine. In some wells, the researcher­s found a mix of human and animal waste.

In addition, 13 of the wells were found to have pathogenic organisms that could make people sick. The results were sent to homeowners this week.

“I would say that there is widespread fecal contaminat­ion in the counties, but concentrat­ions tend to be on the low side,” Borchardt said.

The wells containing pathogens that could sicken people are worrisome, he said. But overall, the results “are a cause for concern, but not a cause for alarm.”

While more contaminat­ion came from defective septic systems than from livestock, Borchardt said he expected proportion­s to change in future rounds of testing.

Another study by Borchardt in cattle-intensive Kewaunee County in the northeast in 2016 and 2017 also showed widespread well contaminat­ion. The sources came from cattle — especially during wet conditions when water was flowing into aquifers — and from ineffective septic systems.

The results in southweste­rn Wisconsin show that “what we are currently doing is not working,” said Lynda Schweikert, director of conservati­on, sanitation and zoning in Grant County.

“We can’t point fingers at just farmers or just septics — we know all of it is having an impact.”

Scott Laeser, director of water programs for Clean Wisconsin, an environmen­tal group, agreed.

“What we shouldn’t do is get bogged down in finger-pointing,” Laeser said. “We need to start focusing on what we are going to do about it.”

Jamie Mara, a spokesman for the Wisconsin Dairy Business Associatio­n, said that “these latest findings in southweste­rn Wisconsin confirm again what research elsewhere has shown — there are multiple sources of contaminat­ion.

“That’s why achieving long-lasting solutions is going to require a comprehens­ive approach.”

He added that the “farming community is not shying away from these issues.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States