Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

Free doorbell camera, if you let police watch

- Sydney Czyzon

It’s like an old-fashioned block watch, but with a digital twist.

Instead of peering out windows, people are looking at their computers and phones, watching video footage from their doorbell cameras.

In some Milwaukee neighborho­ods, the police may wind up watching, too.

Two south side business improvemen­t districts and a separate business associatio­n recently partnered with the

Milwaukee Police

Department to provide area residents free and discounted Ring cameras. The camera company is owned by tech giant Amazon.

Residents who receive free cameras through the business groups are required to sign agreements that they will cooperate with law enforcemen­t requests, buy Ring’s cloud storage service and use their cameras “appropriat­ely.”

“Any of type of camera system being used is always beneficial,” said Milwaukee Police Capt. Kristin Riestra, who oversees District 6 on the city’s south side. “It’s an extension of the old-school block watch.”

“This is the wave of the future. There’s no expectatio­n to privacy when you’re out on the public street.” Former Ald. Terry Witkowski who represente­d West Layton Avenue area

The agreements help police build a network of cameras across the city. They also allow officers to get footage quickly, without obtaining a search warrant. That and other factors have raised privacy concerns.

“What we’ve seen and what particular­ly concerns civil rights advocates and the ACLU is a growing surveillan­ce state with police having access to an ever-expanding network of cameras,” said Tim Muth, an attorney at ACLU of Wisconsin.

Officials with Ring would not tell the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel how many police department­s they are working with nationwide. But tech news organizati­on CNET reported that Ring has partnered with more than 50 department­s, including those in Houston and Bloomfield, New Jersey.

The company sells its cheapest cameras for $99. MPD received discount codes for about $40 off the cameras. In some cases, they are given free to residents.

In all, at least 175 have been given out in the past two years.

Police access to the informatio­n isn’t the only worry cited by critics.

It is unclear how Amazon uses data from the Ring cameras. It isn’t certain how Ring camera use is monitored. And it’s unknown how Amazon plans to further develop its facial recognitio­n technology, which can be tied in to the cameras.

Tara Cavazos, executive director of the Historic Highway 41 BID, maintains that the cameras help reduce burglaries, vandalizat­ion and other crimes in her area. Historic Highway 41 runs along West Layton Avenue.

She recalls two arrests based on Ring camera evidence.

“It’s everyone assisting everyone,” Cavazos said of the Ring-camera initiative. “Unless something major happens, law enforcemen­t is not going to come to you and ask you for your camera.”

Police partnershi­p

Evidence is key for police officers, who gather a variety of materials as they track suspects.

Ring is a way to get that evidence quickly.

“This is the wave of the future,” said

former Ald. Terry Witkowski, who represente­d the West Layton Avenue area until stepping down in late May. “There’s no expectatio­n to privacy when you’re out on the public street.”

Before he was an alderman, Witkowski worked on the Milwaukee Safety Commission, where he eventually became safety director.

Looking at a digital map, officers can see which households have registered Ring cameras. Officers can then request video footage from those households. The department has addresses, names and contact informatio­n of people who received free cameras, along with others who choose to register their cameras voluntaril­y, Cavazos said.

Meanwhile, Ring’s free smartphone applicatio­n, called Neighbors, shows locations of video or written posts by residents. Users can instantly share live and recorded Ring videos with others. The app operates as an open forum for people to ask one another about suspicious activities.

MPD, like other department­s, monitors posts on the Neighbors app.

“Camera owners that share video with the Milwaukee Police Department play a crucial role in the ability of the Milwaukee Police to solve crime and keep our neighborho­ods safe for people to live, work and raise a family,” the department said in a statement.

It is unclear how many households and businesses have registered Ring cameras and how often MPD monitors the Neighbors app or residents using

Ring footage. The department did not respond to questions about Ring from the Journal Sentinel.

Not only do the cameras hold criminals accountabl­e, they hold police responsibl­e, too.

Bay View resident Daniela Perez said she reported to officials when her Ring cameras caught members of MPD repeatedly stopping foster teens on her block. She said the teens were approached in their cars and on their front porch — and that officers tried to wrongly pin one of the teens as a crime suspect.

“It just gets really frustratin­g because residents of the Bay View neighborho­od want to be safe, but it’s really hard when we have video evidence showing that these same poor teenagers are being targeted,” Perez said.

Perez said she and other residents reported the incidents to MPD, but were told that officers were “just doing their jobs.”

MPD did not respond to Perez’s allegation­s, but encouraged residents to contact police with concerns.

‘What if I forget to close my blinds?’

To get a free Ring camera, residents might be sacrificing some freedoms.

The Historic Highway 41 BID has residents sign written agreements when claiming free cameras.

Muth said the written agreements — which require police cooperatio­n and storage subscripti­ons — present a “huge problem.” He said police should still need a warrant to search someone’s personal property.

Ring itself has spoken out against these kinds of agreements.

“Ring does not support programs that require recipients to subscribe to a recording plan or share footage as a condition for receiving a donated device,” a Ring spokespers­on said in a statement. “We are actively working with partners to ensure this is reflected in their programs.”

Cavazos, meanwhile, said her BID’s decision to create the agreements “really is not tied into what Ring’s thoughts are on it.”

Another part of the local agreement asks users to operate their Ring cameras appropriat­ely, though it is unclear what this means or how it is enforced.

“We just want to be clear that we’re giving it to people in good faith,” Cavazos said.

Ring cameras capture the field of view chosen by their owners.

Bay View resident Blaine Venturine said he’s worried cameras might capture private moments inside nearby households.

“What if I forget to close my blinds?” Venturine asked.

Unknown how data is used

It’s unclear how Amazon uses Ring customers’ data and video footage.

It’s a fact that leaves some Milwaukee residents concerned.

Brent Bublitz, who lives north of Bay View, said he purchased surveillan­ce cameras from another company to store his own footage. His data stays on a hard drive in his basement.

He can’t access the footage remotely like Ring users can, but Bublitz has peace of mind.

“I’m not reliant on a company that I would have to pay a monthly fee to access the video,” Bublitz said. “The video will always be there when I need it.”

Muth said keeping footage on a hard drive prevents users from unknowingl­y giving data to a big tech company.

“You get this picture of Big Brother government law enforcemen­t agencies with access to hundreds of millions of images of people going about their daily life,” Muth said.

Still, Ring cameras keep attracting customers. One selling point: They don’t

require users to have personal computers or set up hard drive space.

“I’m a realist to recognize people are going to like the convenienc­e of the ease of setting up a Ring doorbell system,” Muth said. “They can just look at it in this app that’s already created.”

Muth encouraged people with Ring cameras to read privacy policies in full. The Federal Trade Commission and other authoritie­s can take action if a company deceives users.

“That being said, I’m not sure that the companies so far are afraid of the regulators,” Muth said.

Ring did not provide a response to a Journal Sentinel question about how it addresses privacy concerns.

“Privacy and security and consent are extremely important to us, and every decision we make as a company centers around these three pillars,” a Ring spokespers­on said.

Facial recognitio­n and racial profiling

On the Neighbors app, videos of people doing nothing more than ringing doorbells are shared constantly.

“Does anyone know this man?” a resident asked on the afternoon on July 5.

“Does anybody recognize this man or his company?” another resident asked on the evening of July 11.

Muth is concerned about the unconsciou­s biases that arise when people share videos of neighborho­od visitors.

“I have a real concern that there would be a certain level of racial profiling — that people are more likely, unfortunat­ely, to post pictures of people of color coming to their door and ringing their doorbell than they would if it was just a white person,” Muth said.

The effects of this could extend beyond the Neighbors app.

Amazon offers facial recognitio­n technology, called Rekognitio­n, that allows people to add video and image analysis to their Ring devices.

The ACLU obtained marketing materials showing that Amazon promotes Rekognitio­n to law enforcemen­t agencies. Police department­s can build databases of mugshot photos and use Amazon’s facial recognitio­n technology to scan for matches from Ring surveillan­ce footage.

The ACLU found that the Orlando Police Department in Florida and the Washington County Sheriff’s Office in Oregon were Rekognitio­n customers.

MPD did not comment when asked by the Journal Sentinel if it uses Rekognitio­n.

The partnershi­p with the Orlando Police Department recently ended after city officials said the technology had glitches and infrastruc­ture issues, the Orlando Weekly reported. The Weekly reported that the department was never able to test images.

The ACLU tested Amazon’s facial recognitio­n system on members of Congress in July 2018 and found that false matches disproport­ionately affected people of color.

While people of color made up about 20% of Congress at the time, about 40% of the false matches were people of color. The test incorrectl­y identified 28 members of Congress as people who have been arrested for a crime.

Financial investment

Two years into the Ring partnershi­p, three Milwaukee business organizati­ons have invested about $30,000 in implementi­ng Ring surveillan­ce technology.

Milwaukee’s Historic Highway 41 BID partnered in 2018 with the Gateway to Milwaukee business associatio­n, which works to bolster economic developmen­t around Milwaukee Mitchell Internatio­nal Airport. At the time, Highway 41 BID’s safety committee and Gateway to Milwaukee each invested $7,000 to purchase Ring cameras.

In 2019, the Crisol Corridor BID — located near the intersecti­on of South 13th Street and West Oklahoma Avenue — joined in on the collaborat­ion. All three organizati­ons then invested $5,000 each into Ring technology.

MPD was recognized for the joint efforts with the Outstandin­g Greater Milwaukee Partnershi­p award in February, overseen by nonprofit organizati­ons Safe & Sound and LISC Milwaukee. The award honors “partnershi­ps that have contribute­d to reducing crime, fear and disorder in their respective community.”

The future of the partnershi­p isn’t set in stone.

Cavazos said the BIDs’ Ring collaborat­ion with MPD in 2020 will depend on results of a survey of residents and crime rate data, among other factors. She expects to receive this informatio­n in October or November before a decision is made.

 ?? ASSOCIATED PRESS ?? A Ring doorbell camera is shown at a home in Coon Rapids, Minn.
ASSOCIATED PRESS A Ring doorbell camera is shown at a home in Coon Rapids, Minn.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States