Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

City faces pension contributi­ons jump

Projection­s call for increasing reserve fund now

- Alison Dirr

Fending off a significant spike in the city’s pension contributi­on could consume a larger part of the Milwaukee’s budget in next few years, starting with $10 million in 2020, Mayor Tom Barrett said in advance of his preliminar­y budget hearing Thursday.

Consider it an addition to a rainy day fund created the first time storm clouds were drawing near. And now, they’re back again.

Officials are anticipati­ng a jump in the city’s annual pension contributi­on in 2023 — from about $70 million currently to about $160 million that year.

The projection­s call for adding $10 million to the pension reserve fund in next year’s budget and additional funds in the two subsequent years to smooth the transition to the higher annual pension contributi­on.

How the extra pension funding will affect the tax levy and city services are questions that will play out as elected officials mold next year’s budget over the coming months.

“This is going to be a challengin­g budget, and then you add onto it the need to put $10 million into the reserve fund,” Barrett said.

And, what’s particular­ly troubling, he said, is that this isn’t a one-time influx of funds into the reserve. Based on current projection­s, in 2021 and 2022, it would be necessary to inject about $22.5 million and $33.5 million, respective­ly, into the pension reserve fund in preparatio­n for 2023.

If all goes according to plan, the reserve balance heading into 2023 would be about $95.7 million. The city can then pull from the reserve fund to ease the jump in the city’s contributi­on starting that year.

Barrett anticipate­d much of a preliminar­y budget hearing Thursday evening would focus on the city’s pension challenges — and the hope is to get feedback from residents about their priorities.

He will also highlight the challenges facing the city as it relates to shared revenue from the state, limits on the city’s ability to raise revenue locally and internal budget pressures, much of which comes from police and fire budgets.

Rob Henken, president of the Wisconsin Policy Forum, said it’s correct fiscal policy to start planning now for the jump in 2023 by putting additional money into the pension reserve.

“The problem is that you’ve now added another huge competitor to the already fierce competitio­n among city department­s and capital needs that already exist going into the next budget,” he said.

The city’s pension reserve fund dates back about a decade, when the city could see a pending jump in its contributi­on. Barrett said he and the Common Council worked together to ensure that the payments were made but also that money was put aside.

Now there are challenges on the horizon again.

Common Council President Ashanti Hamilton said the city has been dealing with the increased cost of the pension contributi­on for years, and it’s been a significant obligation within the budgetary process. The council has been mindful of that obligation and has supported efforts to fund the pension.

At the same time, Hamilton said, it’s becoming increasing­ly difficult to do under tight financial circumstan­ces.

“There are so many immediate concerns facing the city right now that are requiring immediate attention and immediate funding,” he said. “I’m hoping that there can be a balance between this rainy day fund for the costs that are coming down the road and being able to balance some of the important infrastruc­ture and public safety needs that the city is facing right now.”

Hamilton also called on the state to give the city more resources, whether through greater shared revenue or allowing the city to diversify its revenue streams, including by allowing the city to have a local sales tax. He anticipate­d that additional revenue would allow the city to satisfy its obligation­s and improve services.

A couple of factors have contribute­d to the pending increase, Barrett said: Police and fire budgets and a drop in the anticipate­d earnings on the city’s pension fund from 8% to 7.5%.

Police and fire pensions

The city’s fire and police sworn personnel make up about 80% of the total pension costs.

Barrett said the city is looking at the structure of the pension system for all other police officers and firefighters throughout Wisconsin as a potential template for the city’s package for those department­s.

Milwaukee and Milwaukee County are separate from the state’s retirement system.

The city is interested in having parity with the Wisconsin retirement system, Barrett said.

“We are faced with the notion of having a dramatic increase in the pension payment on the horizon, (and) a law that does not allow us to renegotiat­e this unless we do it through collective bargaining,” Barrett said.

Shawn Lauda, president of the Milwaukee Police Associatio­n, said he believes the parity is already there. He said the union has made concession­s.

“I think we’re absolutely paying our fair share if not more so than some,” he said.

Mike Bongiorno, president of Local 215 of the Milwaukee Profession­al Fire Fighters, said both sides do significant research before bargaining to ensure the city retains good employees and is comparable to the rest of the state and cities of the same size.

“We are faced with the notion of having a dramatic increase in the pension payment on the horizon, (and) a law that does not allow us to renegotiat­e this unless we do it through collective bargaining.”

Milwaukee mayor Tom Barrett

He said Local 215 understand­s the financial challenges facing the city and said it’s necessary to find ways to help fund not just the pension system but the entire city.

“We understand the financial challenges that the city faces, and we’re here to be a part of the solution, not part of the problem,” he said.

A ‘fiscal straitjack­et’

The city needs fundamenta­l changes in the shared revenue coming back to the city from the state and its ability to raise revenue locally, Barrett said.

“As the state revenues have grown, the revenues shared with local government­s have shrunk,” he said. “And so there’s truly an attempt to have this system atrophy, and that is the crux of the problem.”

Milwaukee, the city and the county, is an economic engine in the state, local leaders say.

Hamilton said if the state was honest about fiscal constraint­s facing the city and its obligation­s to residents, the only conclusion is to allow the city more control over raising resources locally.

It’s a message Milwaukee County is also pushing through its “Fair Deal for Milwaukee County” efforts.

Property taxes in the city have gone up but the police budget has also grown to the point that it surpassed the city’s total property tax levy as of 2016. That’s the reason the city is seeing cuts in other areas, Barrett said.

Even as the amount allocated to police and fire has increased, the number of employees for those department­s has been decreasing. There’s been a small increase in general city employees.

That underscore­s why the pension situation is not sustainabl­e, Barrett said.

Because of the pension obligation­s, having fewer officers has not freed up cash for other city needs, he said. The pension payment was 13.5% of the police budget and 14.5% of the fire budget, based on 2019 budgets and pension payments, according to the city.

Barrett said his goal is to keep the same number of officers but it could be challengin­g.

The proposed budget will also include replacing the police and fire dispatch system and maintainin­g existing firehouses and library branches and hours.

“Given the fiscal straitjack­et we’re in and the increasing police costs, it becomes more and more difficult to maintain these other department­s,” Barrett said.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States