Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

Weinstein found guilty on two sex assault charges

Jury acquits disgraced mogul of three most serious counts

- Patrick Ryan and Maria Puente USA TODAY

NEW YORK – Harvey Weinstein, the formerly powerful movie mogul accused by many women of sexual misconduct that supercharg­ed the #MeToo movement, was convicted of two sex crimes Monday after a weekslong trial featuring graphic testimony from six tearful accusers. Weinstein was found guilty of criminal sexual act in the first degree related to accuser Miriam “Mimi” Haleyi and rape in the third degree related to accuser Jessica Mann.

Weinstein was immediatel­y handcuffed and taken into custody; his lawyers asked that he be taken to a medical facility. He was to be sentenced March 11.

Two of his lawyers, Donna Rotunno and Arthur Aidala, said they planned to appeal. “As sure as I am bald,” Aidala said.

The split verdict was rendered during the fifth day of deliberati­ons by a jury of seven men and five women who deliberate­d a total of more than 24 hours.

The verdict was a partial win for the prosecutio­n: Weinstein escaped the two most serious charges of predatory sexual assault, plus one charge of rape in the first degree, which spared him the possibilit­y of a sentence that included life in prison.

The not-guilty verdict on the two predatory charges means the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office cannot try him again on those counts. On Friday, the jury had indicated it was hung on the two predatory charges and unanimous on the rest. Assistant District Attorney Joan Illuzzi rejected acceptance of a partial verdict, and the judge sent the jury back to deliberate.

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr. hailed the verdict as a win and a “good day” for sexual assault survivors,

Harvey Weinstein was in custody Monday in New York. After a week’s work, a jury found him guilty of two sex charges. JOHN MINCHILLO/AP

labeling Weinstein a “vicious serial sexual predator.”

He said Weinstein, 67, faces a prison sentence of at least five years and possibly as long as 25 years. He especially praised the accusers who testified for their bravery and for enduring challengin­g cross-examinatio­n.

Vance said he was “not dissatisfied” with the verdict despite not convicting Weinstein on the most serious counts. Vance said sex-crime cases are difficult and complicate­d, but the trial outcome suggests accusers have greater hope that their allegation­s will be believed.

“Rape is rape and assault is assault, whether it’s committed by a stranger in a dark alley or a domestic partner in a working relationsh­ip,” Vance said after the verdict.

Initial reaction from some activists was tinged with some dismay.

“The split verdict in today’s Weinstein trial speaks volumes about the complicate­d and difficult process that survivors face in seeking justice and holding abusers accountabl­e,” said Ebony Tucker, executive director of Raliance, a national organizati­on dedicated to fighting sexual violence. “We stand with the women who came forward to share their story and are immensely disappoint­ed that justice was not served for all of them.”

Tarana Burke, the woman who created the #MeToo hashtag and helped found the movement, issued a statement praising the verdict and condemning “unjust laws.”

“Today, a jury confirmed what we all know: Harvey Weinstein committed sexual assault,” her statement said. “This jury worked with an incredibly narrow and unjust set of laws governing sexual assault, and though he was not convicted on all counts, Harvey Weinstein will have to answer for his crimes.”

Weinstein’s mouth was agape as the verdict was read, and Rotunno shook her head. As the jury was being polled, he huddled with Rotunno and Aidala at the defense table.

The jury reached the verdict around 11:30 a.m. ET Monday. Just before it was read, the defense filed a motion for a mistrial, citing an anonymous email sent to a member of Weinstein’s legal team regarding a juror.

Judge James Burke denied it, saying the issue was moot as the jury had reached a verdict.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States