Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

Officials fear disruption­s from virus

CDC: Prepare for school closures, remote work

- Mark Johnson

For almost two months, U.S. health officials have been able to watch the rapidly spreading new coronaviru­s in China, and nervously take comfort that at least we’re not in Wuhan.

But on Tuesday, the Centers for Disease

Control and Prevention and other health officials asked Americans to consider the once unthinkabl­e.

“We have to get past the idea of ‘is this going to be a problem or not?’ This is going to play out around the world like it did in China,” said Michael Osterholm, who directs the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy at the University

of Minnesota. “There has been a real reluctance to go there, but the virus does not change its ability to cause disease by crossing a boundary.”

“Disruption to everyday life may be severe,” Nancy Messonnier, director of the CDC’s National Center for Immunizati­on and Respirator­y Diseases, warned at a news conference Tuesday. Schools could be closed, mass public gatherings suspended and businesses forced to have employees work remotely, she said.

Messonnier said the coronaviru­s has caused sickness and death, and sustained person-to-person transmissi­on. That’s two of the three factors for a pandemic, she said.

Although the World Health Organizati­on determined Monday that the term

pandemic “did not fit the facts,” experts said it very soon could.

Health experts in the U.S. said the top priority should be protecting health care workers from becoming overwhelme­d with patients and infected themselves.

“There are 3,000 health care workers in China who are infected,” Osterholm said.

In the 2003 epidemic of SARS, another member of the coronaviru­s family, health care workers accounted for more than one-third of those infected, according to one study. The CDC has advised people who think they may have the virus to call their health providers first, rather than showing up at a hospital emergency room.

Stanley Perlman, a University of Iowa professor who has been studying coronaviru­ses for 38 years and vaccine developmen­t on and off for the last 17 years, called the response by hospitals in Wuhan “unbelievab­le.” He worries that the U.S. is not prepared to face a similar flood of infected patients.

“To think any hospital could handle that in the U.S. would be naive,” Perlman said. “They’d have to build more hospitals.”

Conflictin­g messages

For weeks, health officials have stressed that people must come very close to someone who is infected in order to contract the new coronaviru­s.

“That is not the case,” said Osterholm, author of the book “Deadliest Enemy: Our War Against Killer Germs.”

The virus is transmitte­d through droplets released by coughing and sneezing, but when people cough, the size of the particles varies. Larger particles drop to the ground or onto another surface, others are much lighter and can potentiall­y float in the air for as long as a week.

There is disagreeme­nt about the likelihood of the new coronaviru­s traveling through ventilatio­n systems, a scenario that would allow the infection to spread from a person in one part of a building to a person in another. Osterholm said such a scenario is a distinct possibilit­y.

“It’s physically possible but unlikely because ventilatio­n systems are quite long and there are lots of opportunit­ies for the virus to settle within a duct,” said Rachael M. Jones, an associate professor of family and preventive medicine at the University of Utah.

While there has been a mounting sense of concern about the new coronaviru­s since its discovery in late December, Americans have found themselves pulled in opposite directions.

On the one hand were the images from China: large crowds wearing masks, doctors in protective gear resembling “moon suits” and airport screeners.

On the other were the reassuranc­es of U.S. health officials saying few cases had shown up here (14 according to the CDC, one of them in Wisconsin), and that Americans are more at risk from flu at the moment.

The comments from health authoritie­s Tuesday appeared to cross a threshold by urging Americans to prepare themselves for the possibilit­y that what they have seen on television thousands of miles away may become their own reality in the coming months.

Osterholm said he believes the World Health Organizati­on was overly optimistic in suggesting that the virus can be contained. Although complete lockdowns of Chinese cities housing hundreds of millions of people may have slowed the virus, it is not a sustainabl­e strategy, he said.

“That can’t continue to happen,” he said, “if the Chinese are going to continue to have an economy.”

Osterholm said that trying to contain the new virus is much like trying to stop seasonal flu, except that “this is killing people at 20 times the rate of seasonal flu, even in a bad flu year.”

Seasonal flu tends to kill fewer than one-tenth of 1% of those infected. Current estimates are that the new coronaviru­s is killing somewhere around 2% to 2.5%.

“I don’t believe that’s settled yet,” cautioned Janet Baseman, a professor in the department of epidemiolo­gy at the University of Washington School of Public Health.

A comparison can be drawn between coronaviru­s and the 1918 Spanish flu. While the fatality rates may differ — the Spanish flu killed about 2.5% of the infected — both spread through dense population­s (the trenches and military camps in World War I, and a large provincial capital in modern China).

Neither approaches the fatality rates for SARS (11%), ebola (about 50%) and the H5N1 bird flu (60%).

Can it spread in advance of symptoms?

So far there is evidence that the virus can infect people for days before they experience symptoms, such as fever and difficulty breathing. The fear is that if they don’t feel sick people with the infection could go out shopping and continue going to work without realizing they could be spreading the virus to others.

However, Jones, at the University of Utah, said, “There’s only one report I’ve seen that people can spread the virus before they have symptoms. I don’t know that for a fact.”

Ajay K. Sethi, associate professor of Population Health Sciences at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, was more certain about the possibilit­y.

“Right now there has been confirmed asymptomat­ic transmissi­on,” he said. “We just don’t know how much of the spread is being driven by people who are asymptomat­ic.”

Such uncertaint­y is one of the problems health officials are battling in trying to balance fear and reassuranc­e. That sense of the unknown is perhaps most acute when it comes to the lack of a treatment of the new virus.

Perlman, at the University of Iowa, said that the search for a treatment begins with one sobering fact: “We don’t understand the disease that well.”

Doctors have yet to find a treatment, but even if they had one, it might not be very useful, Perlman said. “A lot of the disease occurs when people are eliminatin­g the virus.”

The problem is that our bodies harness an overwhelmi­ng immune response to the virus but cannot just switch off the response when the virus is in retreat.

Instead, the immune system continues to make molecules that destroy tissue, Perlman said.

Though SARS put a scare into government­s and health authoritie­s 17 years ago, developmen­t of a vaccine quickly became a relatively low priority.

William Haseltine, a former Harvard Medical School professor who chairs the U.S.-China Health Summit, said that in all likelihood a vaccine for SARS would also have worked for other coronaviru­ses.

In a previous interview with the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel he said, “We neglected to develop rapid diagnostic tests and neglected to develop and stockpile anti-coronaviru­s drugs, which we could have and should have done.”

Both Osterholm and Perlman said that developing a vaccine is likely to take years.

In Wisconsin on Tuesday, Froedtert Hospital and Children’s Wisconsin hospital released statements on their preparatio­ns for possible coronaviru­s cases.

“Children’s Wisconsin is always prepared to safely and effectively handle patients that come to us with a highly infectious disease such as coronaviru­s,” the hospital said. “Our staff is trained to follow standard safety precaution­s for all patients and to implement additional protection­s for those with a highly contagious virus, including isolation protocol, the use of specialize­d personal protective equipment (PPE) and negativepr­essure patient rooms.

“As with any highly infectious disease, the best precaution is to practice good hygiene, including washing hands thoroughly and often, and staying home if you’re feeling sick.”

Froedtert Hospital and the Medical College of Wisconsin released a statement saying they “are carefully monitoring informatio­n from the CDC and WHO about COVID-19 and the evolving situation.” They said they have already instituted infection prevention and control measures “consistent with those outlined by CDC and WHO.”

“Children’s Wisconsin is always prepared to safely and effectivel­y handle patients that come to us with a highly infectious disease such as coronaviru­s. ... As with any highly infectious disease, the best precaution is to practice good hygiene, including washing hands thoroughly and often, and staying home if you’re feeling sick.” Children’s Wisconsin statement

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States