Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

Doctors sue to block FDA abortion pill rule

In-person visit called risk during viral pandemic

- Michael Kunzelman

SILVER SPRING, Md. – Requiring patients to visit a hospital, clinic or medical office to get an abortion pill is needlessly risking their health during the COVID-19 pandemic, a group of physicians alleges in a lawsuit that seeks to suspend the federal rule.

The federal lawsuit, which the American Civil Liberties Union filed Wednesday in Maryland, questions why patients can’t fill a prescripti­on for mifepristo­ne by mail. The U.S. Food and Drug Administra­tion approved mifepristo­ne to be used in combinatio­n with a second drug, misoprosto­l, to end an early pregnancy or manage a miscarriag­e.

“Of the more than 20,000 drugs regulated by the FDA, mifepristo­ne is the only one that patients must receive in person at a hospital, clinic, or medical office, yet may self-administer, unsupervis­ed, at a location of their choosing,” the lawsuit says.

The ACLU sued the FDA and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on behalf of the American College of Obstetrici­ans and Gynecologi­sts and other groups.

An HHS spokeswoma­n referred an Associated Press reporter’s inquiry to the FDA’s media affairs office, which said in an email that the agency does not comment on pending litigation.

In 2017, the ACLU filed a lawsuit in

Hawaii that challenged the FDA limits on where women can get the abortion pill. In January, a federal judge suspended the Hawaii case until the U.S. Supreme Court rules in a separate abortion-related lawsuit from Louisiana. The Louisiana case could determine whether doctors and clinics have a right to challenge abortion restrictio­ns in federal courts.

Julia Kaye, staff attorney at the ACLU Reproducti­ve Freedom Project, said the Trump administra­tion apparently would rather endanger the lives of patients and doctors than lift “an unnecessar­y barrier to abortion care.”

“At every other turn during this pandemic, the federal government is trying to make it easier for patients to get the medical care they need without unnecessar­y health care visits that jeopardize their safety,” Kaye said.

The federal courts have heard other cases concerning access to abortions during the coronaviru­s pandemic.

After Republican Gov. Greg Abbott of Texas issued an executive order in March that barred nonessenti­al medical procedures during the pandemic, Texas’ Republican attorney general said that providing abortions other than for an immediate medical emergency would violate the order. A federal appeals court ruled last month that Texas can ban medication abortions to fight the spread of COVID-19.

Earlier this month, a federal judge rejected a request by Arkansas’ only surgical abortion clinic to prevent the state from enforcing a rule requiring a negative coronaviru­s test before a woman undergoes the procedure.

 ?? JACQUELYN MARTIN/AP ?? Abortion rights demonstrat­ors rally outside the Supreme Court in March. A federal lawsuit filed Wednesday questions why patients can’t fill a prescripti­on for an abortion pill by mail.
JACQUELYN MARTIN/AP Abortion rights demonstrat­ors rally outside the Supreme Court in March. A federal lawsuit filed Wednesday questions why patients can’t fill a prescripti­on for an abortion pill by mail.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States