Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

Justices rule E. Oklahoma is Native American jurisdicti­on

- Richard Wolf and Kevin Johnson USA TODAY

WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court ruled Thursday that the eastern half of Oklahoma can be considered Native American territory, a decision the state previously warned could create “civil, criminal and regulatory turmoil.”

The 5-4 decision was written by Associate Justice Neil Gorsuch and joined by the court’s four liberal justices. The justices were considerin­g the issue for the second time after failing to decide a different case last year, when Gorsuch was recused and the court likely deadlocked.

The case concerned an appeal from Jimcy McGirt, a Native American, who claimed his state rape conviction from 1997 should be overturned because Oklahoma lacked jurisdicti­on. Congress, his attorney Ian Gershengor­n said, never properly terminated the reservatio­n.

During oral arguments in May, the justices reached back to 1907 to determine whether Congress, using imprecise language, failed to disestabli­sh the 1866 boundaries of the reservatio­n.

If so, virtually half of Oklahoma – home to 1.8 million residents and including Tulsa, where President Donald Trump recently held a campaign rally – would remain Native American territory. That means Native Americans are subject to federal, not state, laws.

“In reaching our conclusion about what the law demands of us today, we do not pretend to foretell the future and we proceed well aware of the potential for cost and conflict around jurisdicti­onal boundaries, especially ones that have gone unapprecia­ted for so long,” Gorsuch wrote in Thursday’s decision.

“But it is unclear why pessimism should rule the day. With the passage of time, Oklahoma and its Tribes have proven they can work successful­ly together as partners.”

“The federal government promised the (Muscogee Creek Nation) a reservatio­n in perpetuity,” Gorsuch wrote, adding that while Congress has “diminished” the sanctuary over time, lawmakers had “never withdrawn the promised reservatio­n.”

“As a result, many of the arguments before us today follow a sadly familiar pattern. Yes, promises were made, but the price of keeping them has become too great, so now we should just cast a blind eye. We reject that thinking.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States