Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

John Gurda: Giant river cleanup could rid city of a toxic legacy

Feds funding a large portion of costs

- John Gurda Guest columnist

Last March, when Milwaukee learned that it would be hosting the 2020 Democratic National Convention, you could practicall­y feel the city’s pulse quicken. COVID-19 has slowed that pulse dramatical­ly, but the announceme­nt was still a historic win for Milwaukee. However reduced in scale, this month’s convention will bring new recognitio­n and at least a trickle of new money to a city that has generally flown below America’s radar.

We are now in the running for another national prize that should get our collective heart rate up again, and this time for much longer than a few days of speeches and balloons. In scale, speed and impact, it would be a huge step forward for Milwaukee and a historic win for the entire Great Lakes region.

The prize is federal funding for a massive cleanup of Milwaukee’s waterways. What’s proposed is nothing less than removing all the polluted muck from the city’s streambeds and allowing them to flow over clean bottoms for the first time in at least 150 years. The cleanup would cost somewhere north of $200 million, 65% provided by U.S. taxpay

ers and the rest from local sources. That would make it one of the largest public works projects in Milwaukee’s recent history. For comparison, $200 million would fund the city’s entire library system for nearly a decade.

Milwaukee’s rivers were open sewers

The work is decidedly unglamorou­s but entirely necessary. The tall figures of Milwaukee’s past may have been hard workers and visionary thinkers, but collective­ly they were an environmen­tal disaster. With no practical alternativ­es, few regulation­s and a near-total lack of respect for the resources they found here, our ancestors turned the city’s rivers into open sewers.

By 1878, when Milwaukee’s population had surged past the 100,000 mark, the community had nearly 75 miles of sewer pipe under its streets. The system’s sole function was to carry human, animal and industrial waste, mixed with stormwater, to the nearest river; treatment was not the remotest option. Decades of dredging and docking had put the current to sleep, allowing the filth in our waterways to simply sit there until a heavy rain or the municipal flushing pumps pushed it out into Lake Michigan. An 1881 visitor described the Milwaukee River as “a currentles­s and yellowish murky stream, with water like oil, and an odor combined of the effluvia of a hundred sewers.”

Household sewage and horse manure were the worst of it, at least in the short term. They consumed nearly all the available oxygen in the rivers, making them uninhabita­ble for native aquatic life. In the long run, however, the greater menace was the steady stream of contaminan­ts from local industries. For generation­s, Milwaukee’s machine shops, tanneries, breweries and manufactur­ed gas plants simply dumped their waste products — oil and grease, coal tar, hide scrapings, heavy metals, PCBs, PHAs — into the nearest stream. Human and animal waste dissipated over time, but industrial pollutants became the gift that kept on giving.

The muck is still there

The water in Milwaukee’s rivers is noticeably cleaner today than it was a generation ago, thanks in no small part to the Deep Tunnel system that opened in 1993. The muck at the bottom of those rivers is another story entirely. The “legacy” contaminan­ts of our polluted past are still there, endangerin­g human health, killing aquatic organisms, causing deformitie­s in fish and compromisi­ng our claim to be a global water hub. Since 1987, the Milwaukee estuary — our harbor and the rivers that feed it — has been a federally designated Area of Concern, one of 43 hot spots on the Great Lakes. The AOCs are a club that no one wants to join.

Membership need not be permanent. Since the establishm­ent of the Environmen­tal

Protection Agency in 1970 — and passage of the Clean Water Act two years later — the federal government has played a leading role in America’s cleanup efforts, including several in Milwaukee. Federally supported remediatio­n projects have been going on under our noses for decades, in the Milwaukee River, the Little Menomonee, the Kinnickinn­ic, the Menomonee Valley, Cedar Creek and Lincoln Creek.

For all the good they’ve done, none of these projects has attracted much attention. Part of the reason may be their piecemeal nature — a hot spot here, a point source there — but the lack of awareness may also have something to do with the formidable jargon of the federal bureaucrac­y. Trying to understand the ongoing cleanup effort can be an Adventure in Acronymlan­d. In fact, the program most relevant to Milwaukee can be fairly summarized in capital letters: The EPA’s GLRI supports RAPs to remove BUIs in AOCs. In somewhat plainer English, the Environmen­tal Protection Agency’s Great Lakes Restoratio­n Initiative supports Remedial Action Plans to remove Beneficial Use Impairment­s in Areas of Concern.

When you get to the bottom of this alphabet soup, the underlying reality is undiluted good news: Milwaukee has a generation­al opportunit­y to solve one of its longest-standing problems, not piecemeal but all at once. The EPA has identified 10 AOCs, Milwaukee’s among them, as priority targets for its Great Lakes remediatio­n efforts over the next four years. Milwaukee, in turn, has assembled a united front of agencies —city, county, state and nonprofit — to coordinate the cleanup. Money is already flowing through the pipeline. The

EPA has agreed to fund 65% of the preliminar­y work, which is projected to cost $29.3 million, and efforts are underway to raise the local match.

Ridding the rivers of their toxic ghosts

Milwaukee’s ultimate goal is to quit the AOC Club, i.e., to be “delisted” as an Area of Concern. Delisting is a highly technical process that requires the removal of specific impairment­s. They include degraded wildlife habitat and poor aesthetics — problems that will be addressed in due time — but seven of the 11 impairment­s that landed Milwaukee on the list rise from contaminat­ed sediments. Before we can leave the club, we’re going to have to get rid of the toxic ghosts that lurk in our watery basements.

Although the details are still being worked out, the general outline of the proposed AOC cleanup is clear. Giant vacuum hoses would suck up the contaminat­ed muck from approximat­ely seven miles on the Milwaukee River, three on the Menomonee and two on the Kinnickinn­ic, including the basin where all three streams meet and tons of the region’s waste came to rest. The worst of the material would be trucked to out-ofstate landfills, but the greater part would be piped to a new containmen­t facility on the lakeside of Jones Island, adjoining an older fill site north of the Lake Express ferry dock. Most of Jones Island is already “made land” deposited over the last century. The disposal facility, engineered to keep 1.7 million cubic yards of waste where it belongs, would create another 46 acres, giving the Port of Milwaukee new docking space and the public another park.

Nowhere on the Great Lakes has such a massive cleanup been attempted under a single agreement involving so many players on such a short timetable. Excitement is building as the project moves forward.

“I’ve been calling our region the Fresh Coast for years,” said Mayor Tom Barrett, “and to live up to that name, we need to maximize recreation and wildlife along our waterways. Cleaning up the AOC would give us a history-making fresh start.”

It might be more accurate to say that the project would unmake history. Parents are accustomed to cleaning up after their kids, but we’re about to start cleaning up after our parents — and the generation­s of parents who polluted our rivers before them.

It’s an odd position to be in, but someone has to be the grown-up here. Let’s hope we get the chance. Even though the AOC project has generated significant momentum, there’s no guarantee that we’ll be able to turn these ambitious plans into freshwater realities.

What will it take to keep the momentum building? A continued spirit of collaborat­ion. Stable funding for the EPA’s Great Lakes Restoratio­n Initiative. And steadfast, demonstrat­ed public support from throughout the region. Our ancestors left us a toxic legacy. Let ours be the generation that takes care of it once and for all.

 ?? WISCONSIN DNR ?? A hydraulic dredge like this one, shown on the Fox River in Green Bay, would remove the contaminat­ed muck from Milwaukee’s riverbeds.
WISCONSIN DNR A hydraulic dredge like this one, shown on the Fox River in Green Bay, would remove the contaminat­ed muck from Milwaukee’s riverbeds.
 ?? JOURNAL SENTINEL FILES ?? This 1968 photo shows a polluted Menomonee River, which more closely resembled a junkyard, near the 16th Street Viaduct. A variety of huge boards and even sections of walls were floating in the area. There was also a large oil slick.
JOURNAL SENTINEL FILES This 1968 photo shows a polluted Menomonee River, which more closely resembled a junkyard, near the 16th Street Viaduct. A variety of huge boards and even sections of walls were floating in the area. There was also a large oil slick.
 ??  ??
 ?? JOURNAL SENTINEL FILES ?? Barges at work dredging. Such boats may soon be at work on Milwaukee’s rivers.
JOURNAL SENTINEL FILES Barges at work dredging. Such boats may soon be at work on Milwaukee’s rivers.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States