Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

Fact-checking first night of RNC 2020

Correction­s, context for 5 claims made at event

- PolitiFact staff Louis Jacobson, Amy Sherman, Samantha Putterman and Miriam Valverde contribute­d to this report.

Republican­s opened their 2020 national convention with speeches touting President Donald Trump’s accomplish­ments interspers­ed with dark rumination­s about what Democrats have in store for America if Joe Biden is elected.

Elected officials and former administra­tion members who spoke Monday night included Sen. Tim Scott and former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley, both of South Carolina.

We fact-checked several claims from speakers during the convention’s first evening.

“We actually saw revenues to the Treasury increase after we lowered taxes in 2017. Rest assured the Democrats do not want you to know that.” Sen. Tim Scott, R-S.C.

Scott’s claim is misleading.

Tax revenues rose by 0.4% between fiscal year 2017 and fiscal year 2018 (federal fiscal years run from Oct. 1 to Sept. 30.). But that small increase disappears once you account for inflation. The Committee for a Responsibl­e Federal Budget, a group that favors shrinking the federal deficit, found that once you adjust for inflation, tax revenues actually fell by about 1.6%. When you factor in economic growth, revenues fell even more.

In fact, the actual amount of tax revenue collected in FY2018 was significantly lower than government projection­s made before the tax package was signed into law, according to a February analysis by the Brookings Institutio­n.

“In 1994, Biden led the charge on a crime bill that put millions of Black Americans behind bars.”

This needs context. Analysts don’t cast the 1994 crime bill as the sole driver for mass incarcerat­ion. Experts say Biden’s 1994 bill was part of a trend that was already underway on the state level.

Annual reports from the U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics show that the Black incarcerat­ion rate rose from about 1,200 per 100,000 in 1985 to about 2,450 per 100,000 in 2000. (This is for both men and women. The rate for Black men in 2000 was 3,457 per 100,000.)

But it’s impossible to draw a straight line between those changes and the crime bill, experts say. Also, criminal policy is driven mostly by state and local decisions, not federal.

“The act didn’t cause mass incarcerat­ion,” Hadar Aviram, a law professor at the University of California, Hastings told us in 2019. “Prison population­s started rising two decades earlier, in the early 1970s, and by 1994 had already more than tripled, from 300,000 to over 1 million.”

The U.S. prison population continued to rise after the 1994 act took effect. But the overall rate of growth slowed down.

Says Joe Biden and Kamala Harris “want massive tax hikes on working families.” Nikki Haley, former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations

This is False. Biden has said he said that “no new taxes” would be imposed on anyone making under $400,000.

Biden’s proposal would repeal provisions in Trump’s tax law for taxpayers earning over $400,000. Specifically, Biden would:

Increase the top corporate tax rate to 28% from 21%;

Raise the top individual federal income tax rate to 39.6%;

Place a 12.4% Social Security tax on incomes above $400,000;

Tax capital gains at the same rate as ordinary income for very high earners.

The Committee for a Responsibl­e Federal Budget, a group that’s hawkish on the federal budget deficit, has confirmed that no direct taxes would be imposed on any household making less than $400,000 per year. Households below $400,000 a year could face small income losses indirectly, largely from the portion of higher corporate taxes that companies pass along to their workers through constraint­s on compensati­on. The vast majority of the income losses from the Biden tax proposal would fall on the top one-fifth of incomes, and especially on the top 1%, experts found.

“When we brought in good-paying jobs (to South Carolina), Biden and Obama sued us. I fought back, and they gave up.”

This partially accurate recounting of a labor dispute exaggerate­s some of the details.

Harking back to her time as South Carolina governor, Haley is referring to a hearing process between the National Labor Relations Board and airplane manufactur­er Boeing after the company decided to start a production line in South Carolina. (It wasn’t technicall­y a lawsuit.) Boeing’s move in 2009 was essentiall­y taking some work away from union plants in Puget Sound, Washington.

The Internatio­nal Associatio­n of Machinists and Aerospace Workers union complained, and the federal board started a hearing process against Boeing on the grounds that it built its factory in South Carolina to punish the union. Retaliatio­n of that sort, if proven, violates federal labor law.

The union and Boeing eventually struck a four-year deal in December 2011 that provided raises, job protection­s and a commitment to make more planes in the Puget Sound area. With the South Carolina plant no longer seen as a threat to jobs in Washington state, the union dropped its complaint and the NLRB ended the process.

As for the political overtones that Haley mentioned, while the case was handled by the Obama-appointed general counsel, it never came before the four board members that Obama appointed. We previously found no evidence that the White House intervened.

“Democrats claim to be for workers, but they’ve spent the entire pandemic trying to sneak a tax break for millionair­es in Democrat states into the COVID relief bill.” Donald Trump Jr.

This statement requires more context. Trump Jr. is referring to efforts by Democrats to erase a provision in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 that caps the deduction for state and local taxes at $10,000. Overall the law’s benefits flow disproport­ionately to wealthier taxpayers.

The Democratic-led House passed a $3 trillion bill in May that included provisions to reinstate the local tax deductions for 2020 and 2021. The bill, known as the Heroes Act, didn’t reach a vote in the Senate.

Trump Jr. said Democrats tried to “sneak” in the tax break, but it was widely reported that Democrats wanted to roll back the deduction cap.

The deduction benefits high-income taxpayers in high-tax jurisdicti­ons, according to the Tax Foundation. New York politician­s fought against the deduction. However, it did not only affect states led by Democrats. The deduction has also been used by taxpayers in other states, such as Texas.

Trump’s portrayal of Democrats trying to help out millionair­es through the Heroes Act neglects that several provisions would help people of lower and moderate incomes by expanding paid sick leave and lengthenin­g the moratorium on evictions and foreclosur­es.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States