Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

Absentee ballots included applicatio­ns

- By Eric Litke

President Donald Trump continued his evidence-free assault on the validity of the 2020 election during a Dec. 2 speech, taking aim at Wisconsin several times. One claim zeroed in on a favorite Trump target — absentee voting — to assert the paperwork behind those ballots was lacking.

“In Wisconsin, there are approximat­ely 70,000 absentee ballots that do not have matching ballot applicatio­ns as required by law,” Trump said.

The claim, included in a list of supposed election fraud examples, was made without any further detail or evidence. As with Trump’s many lawsuits seeking to overturn the election results in Wisconsin and elsewhere, this claim flies in the face of reality.

Here’s why.

Trump misstates his own (wrong) claim

For starters, Trump got the number wrong.

Since the claim in this speech doesn’t provide much context, we reached out to Trump campaign spokeswoma­n Courtney Parella to explain the 70,000 figure. She declined to elaborate aside from referring to the campaign’s Wisconsin lawsuit.

But that lawsuit makes clear Trump was attempting to refer to in-person absentee voting — that’s the only element of his Wisconsin claims related to ballot applicatio­ns. One of the four primary allegation­s in the complaint was that “at least 170,140 absentee ballots were improperly counted as they were issued without the elector having first submitted a written applicatio­n.”

That total is the number of in-person

absentee votes cast in Milwaukee and Dane counties combined, according to the Wisconsin Elections Commission. Those are the two heavily Democratic counties in which the Trump campaign paid for a recount and is now suing.

So Trump meant to say 170,000, not 70,000.

But that’s the least of his issues with the truth.

Yes, absentee voters filled out an applicatio­n

Wisconsini­tes casting a traditiona­l absentee vote do that by applying for a ballot by mail or through the MyVote .wi.gov website. But in-person absentee ballots simplify this down to a single form — an “absentee ballot applicatio­n/certification” located on the envelope that holds the absentee ballot.

Trump’s lawsuit — in line with verbiage from the speech — claims those inperson absentee ballots were filed without “written applicatio­n as expressly required by Wis. Stat. § 6.86(1)(ar).”

But that statute doesn’t include specific requiremen­ts.

That reference in state law simply says municipal clerks shouldn’t issue an absentee ballot “unless the clerk receives a written applicatio­n therefor (sic) from a qualified elector of the municipali­ty.” It details no requiremen­ts for what that applicatio­n should include.

Reid Magney, spokesman for the state Eections Commission, confirmed there are no requiremen­ts in state law on the nature of absentee ballot applicatio­ns, leaving that detail to the commission to decide.

And the commission has required an applicatio­n for every ballot.

“To claim that there is no applicatio­n on file for these absentee ballots is false,” Magney said.

The commission created the combined certificate and applicatio­n in 2010 after complaints following the 2008 presidenti­al election that in-person absentee voting was inefficient and involved too much paperwork.

The Government Accountabi­lity Board (predecesso­r to the elections commission) studied the matter and issued a lengthy report in December 2009. It created the combined form on the envelope of the absentee ballot after holding listening sessions and consulting with clerks around the state.

A memo sent to clerks in May 2010 explained the change this way: “The title of the certificate has changed to indicate that it also serves as an applicatio­n for inperson absentee voters. A line has been added (“I further certify that I requested this ballot.”) to make the document an applicatio­n.

This process — where early voters fill out an envelope applicatio­n — has been used throughout Wisconsin (though not exclusivel­y) since the 2016 election where Trump narrowly carried the state. We should also note this change was implemente­d at a time when Republican­s controlled all of state government.

It was a heavily used approach in this year’s mid-pandemic election. Early inperson votes accounted for 23.7% of all ballots in Milwaukee County and 17.7% in Dane County, according to a Milwaukee Journal Sentinel analysis of voting data from the elections commission. Statewide, nearly 700,000 people voted this way in the November election.

Our ruling

Trump claims in his speech (and a lawsuit) that there are “70,000 absentee ballots that do not have matching ballot applicatio­ns as required by law.” Every part of this is wrong. Trump was actually referring to a group of 170,000 votes, not 70,000.

And that group of in-person absentee voters did indeed fill out an applicatio­n in order to cast their ballot.

It was part of the ballot certificate on the envelope, but that doesn’t make it any less valid since state statute doesn’t specify the nature of that applicatio­n.

It’s the same approach that’s been used without issue in Wisconsin elections since 2010 — including the 2016 presidenti­al contest that Trump won.

We rate Trump’s claim Pants on Fire.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States