Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

State must decide who is next for vaccinatio­n

- Mary Spicuzza, Molly Beck and Sarah Volpenhein

Teachers, grocery clerks, bus drivers, correction­s officers, prisoners and elderly residents could be included in the next phase of Wisconsin’s effort to administer COVID-19 vaccinatio­ns statewide.

But which groups should get the shots first? Who can afford to wait?

Health care officials and experts leading the state’s vaccinatio­n rollout discussed these questions Tuesday and said part of the problem they face

as they make the decision of who will be included in the second phase of vaccinatio­ns, known as 1B, is the growing number of people who think they should be next in line.

Complicati­ng the decision is a lack of clarity about how many doses of vaccine the state will receive each week, making planning difficult.

Health Services Secretary Andrea Palm in a media briefing Tuesday said the first phase could last through February, but noted it’s difficult to predict due to supply and demand. Gov. Tony Evers in the same briefing said he would likely receive his first vaccine dose during the summer, as part of a group of residents who are over the age of 65.

Members of the state’s vaccine distributi­on oversight panel, which is part of the Wisconsin State Disaster Medical Advisory Committee, said at a meeting Tuesday they plan to create a list of suggestion­s for the next phase of vaccinatio­ns by the end of the week.

The planning comes as Wisconsin lags some of its Midwestern neighbors in getting vaccines out to residents.

As of Tuesday, nationwide data collected by the CDC shows that Wisconsin ranks 10th out of 12 Midwestern states in terms of the percentage of the population that has received a dose of the vaccine. More than 67,300 people, or 1.2% of the state’s population, have received a shot, according to the CDC.

However, state Department of Health Services spokeswoma­n Jennifer Miller pointed out the CDC’s data lags behind the state’s figures, which are culled from the Wisconsin Immunizati­on Registry.

The state health department’s data shows Wisconsin has administer­ed 85,609 doses of the vaccine, about onethird of the 266,000 that the state has received so far. That would put Wisconsin at sixth out of the 12 Midwestern states.

According to the state health department, 420,200 doses of the vaccine have been allocated to Wisconsin, of which 56,800 have been set aside for skilled nursing facilities, which began vaccinatin­g last week. More will be set aside for assisted living facilities.

“The rollout has not gone real smoothly, and for as many doses out there, we’re not vaccinatin­g very quickly,” vaccine committee co-chairman Jonathan Temte, the Associate Dean for Public Health and Community Engagement for UW-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, said Tuesday about deciding who is included in the next phase.

“And the larger we make any particular group, the much longer it’s going to take,” he said. “One of the questions is how long do we put off some of those high-risk individual­s.”

Evers on Tuesday dismissed the idea of comparing Wisconsin’s rollout to other states because of the variance in each state’s plans. The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel first reported on the state’s lagging ranking compared to other Midwestern states.

“If you want to compare, fine, compare away,” Evers said. “I think it’s also really important to think about there are some things that can’t be compared.”

Evers said some states include all elderly people in their first phase, whereas Wisconsin doesn’t.

“While we’re worrying about comparing ourselves to Florida or to some other state, I’ve continued to encourage people, at the same time we’re worrying about making those comparison­s, to think about how important it is to make sure we’re not spreading this virus.”

Doses set aside for assisted living

The state is setting aside doses of the COVID-19 vaccine for assisted living facilities several weeks in advance of when they will be administer­ed, which is further limiting the number of doses the state can give immediatel­y to hospital workers and other priority health care workers in the state.

As part of the federal program for vaccinatin­g residents and staff at Wisconsin nursing homes and assisted living facilities, the state is required to set aside tens of thousands of doses in advance, Palm said Tuesday.

By the time vaccinatio­ns began at Wisconsin nursing homes on Dec. 28, the state had set aside nearly 57,000 doses of the Moderna vaccine to cover most residents and staff at Wisconsin’s roughly 350 nursing homes.

State officials have not authorized the program to move forward in Wisconsin’s more than 4,000 assisted living facilities, but the state has already begun setting aside doses that will be needed to vaccinate an estimated 140,000 residents and staff in assisted living, Palm said.

Palm said they wanted to gradually build up their reserve of vaccine needed to start the program in assisted living facilities while still distributi­ng the vaccine to other health care providers prioritize­d for the vaccine in the state.

In all, the state has set aside nearly 107,000 doses for both nursing homes and assisted living facilities, Palm said Tuesday.

“They are not in the state of Wisconsin sitting on a shelf somewhere waiting to be administer­ed,” Palm said. “The feds have us put them essentiall­y in a bank, in a reserve so we are able to have enough sort of down payment to trigger the program and get it started.”

Pharmacy chains CVS and Walgreens began administer­ing vaccines through the federal program in Wisconsin on Dec. 28. They have only been authorized to begin vaccinatio­ns at nursing homes.

Palm on Tuesday did not answer how many doses have been administer­ed through the program so far. Last week, DHS spokeswoma­n Elizabeth Goodsitt said vaccinatio­ns were set to begin last week at 42 nursing homes.

Nationwide, the vaccine rollout in long-term care facilities has been slowgoing. About 13% of the 3.26 million doses distribute­d nationwide for use in long-term care facilities had been administer­ed as of Tuesday, according to data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Palm said she expects that by the end of January, all nursing home residents in Wisconsin will have received their first dose of the Moderna vaccine, which is administer­ed in two doses, separated by about 28 days.

Vaccinatio­n efforts in assisted living facilities could begin later this month or in February.

Among the groups being considered for the next phase of vaccinatio­ns are first responders, food and agricultur­e workers, and people who live in group housing facilities.

‘Is it fair?’

Edward Belongia, director of the Center for Clinical Epidemiolo­gy & Population Health at Marshfield Clinic Research Institute, told members of the State Disaster Medical Advisory Committee’s vaccine distributi­on group on Tuesday that he supported a narrow group for the next phase.

“I’m in favor of trying to really keep Phase 1B really focused on essential frontline workers and not trying to expand that category very much,” he said.

Belongia added that people in their 60s and 70s with “high-risk conditions” will already be included in the third phase, known as 1C.

“Is it fair? Should we be vaccinatin­g folks whose, you know, personal risk is quite low of having a severe complicati­on before we vaccinate people who have a much higher risk of dying?” he said.

There was also discussion of which age groups — such as people 65 and older, or those ages 50-64 — should be included in the next phase, although vaccine subcommitt­ee members raised concerns that making Phase 1B too broad by trying to vaccinate all Wisconsini­tes over 50 would hinder distributi­on efforts rather than helping.

There was also discussion of whether just K-12 teachers should be part of the next phase, or whether it should also include school staff such as custodians, or college and university professors.

Much of the discussion was focused on incarcerat­ed and those living in group housing facilities, and whether they should be included in Wisconsin’s next phase of the rollout.

“There has been quite heavy lobbying and an understand­ing that for these population­s, they are not able to social distance in a proper way, and it may seem more like a long term care facility, but their ages may be lower,” said vaccine subcommitt­ee co-chairwoman Ann Lewandowsk­i, who is also founder of the Wisconsin Immunizati­on Neighborho­od.

Daryl Daane, the pharmacy director for the state Department of Correction­s, argued it would be wrong to provide COVID-19 vaccine to correction­s workers and patients in group housing facilities and not those who are incarcerat­ed.

“These are all very tight confined living spaces. It’s not a large group, we’re talking under 100,000 lives,” he said. “And it seems to me rather unfair if we’re looking at workers but not the incarcerat­ed population. Is that fair or equitable?”

Lewandowsk­i noted that vaccinatin­g longer-term prisoners would be less complicate­d than those in county jails, saying there is a high turnover in jails that could make it “extremely difficult to do two doses of the vaccine.”

But Mary Muse, chief nursing officer and director of nursing for the state Department of Correction­s, said she was “extremely concerned about incarcerat­ed population­s” in both prisons and jails.

“When I look at the issue of inequities and disparitie­s, to not do this population — they don’t have a way of getting access to the vaccine, except that we provide it for them,” she said. “And these people are going back to the community. Not everybody stays in for life.”

But Rob Gundermann, president and CEO of the Coalition of Wisconsin Aging and Health Groups, warned there may be pushback if Wisconsin prioritize­s people in prisons over other groups.

“We have to be prepared to say why we prioritize­d them ahead of somebody else. And remember, if somebody goes ahead, that means somebody’s going behind,” Gunderman said. “That’s really the way we have to frame it, because we are then saying that they’re going in front of people 60 to 74 and everybody else with chronic health conditions. And that’s a tough discussion.”

“The rollout has not gone real smoothly, and for as many doses out there, we’re not vaccinatin­g very quickly. And the larger we make any particular group, the much longer it’s going to take. One of the questions is how long do we put off some of those high-risk individual­s.”

Jonathan Temte, vaccine committee co-chairman, Associate Dean for Public Health and Community Engagement for UW-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States