Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

Study says FBS fails on athletic director gender hires

- MIKE FREEMAN

As you watch the College Football Playoff national championsh­ip game between Alabama and Ohio State on Jan. 11, one of the most interestin­g parts won’t be what’s on the field, but off it. Or, rather, what’s missing, and that will be women in key leadership positions.

Alabama and Ohio State are far from alone.

According to a new study, the Football Bowl Subdivisio­n has one of the sorriest records in all of sports when it comes to gender hiring practices.

The annual diversity report from the Institute for Diversity and Ethics in Sport at the University of Central Florida, written by Richard Lapchick, gave the FBS a B- for racial hiring practices, but an F for gender hiring practices, including failing grades for university chancellor­s and presidents, as well as athletic directors. The result was an overall D+ grade.

“The lack of representa­tion of women in athletic director or president or chancellor positions has remained an issue within the arena of college sport,” Lapchick writes.

He added: “Although there were three more women athletic directors (a 2.3 percentage point increase) at FBS schools, the grade in this category remained an F. Men still comprise an overwhelmi­ng majority of athletic director positions with a total of 118 of the 130 DI FBS schools.”

The report looked at the racial and gender makeup of Division I FBS leadership, in the same way it examined racial and gender hiring practices of other sports such as the NFL and NBA.

The report says the positions of leadership it examined include conference commission­ers and campus leaders, as well as college and university presidents and chancellor­s, athletic directors, and faculty athletic representa­tives from the 130 institutio­ns that make up the FBS.

Additional­ly, the report addressed the racial and gender compositio­n of head football coaches, assistant coaches and student athletes for the football teams.

In 2020, the report states, Black men represente­d only 10.0% of head coaches compared to 48.5% of football players.

“As we look more closely at systemic racism during the racial reckoning after the murder of George Floyd,” Lapchick writes, “it is a sad statement about American higher education that 80.8% of chancellor­s and presidents, 83.1% of athletic directors, 82.0% of faculty athletic representa­tives, and 80.0% of conference commission­ers were white. That is more than 80% of all these key positions.

“Additional­ly, 66.9% of chancellor­s and presidents, 76.9% of athletic directors, 48.2% of faculty athletic representa­tives, and 70.0% of conference commission­ers were white men. The low grades recorded in 2020 reflect the lack of significant growth of diversity in FBS leadership and leads to the continued inequity in sport. The results again do not reflect the far more diverse compositio­n of students and studentath­letes at colleges and universiti­es across the country. They do not even reflect the compositio­n of the American people.”

Also, white people held 82.0% of the 399 campus leadership positions, a decrease from 84.3% in 2019, the study says.

One of the most striking parts of the report is how few women, and particular­ly women of color, hold key positions across the college sports universe.

The report says Ana Mari Cauce at the University of Washington, Neeli Bendapudi at the University of Louisville, Renu Khatorat the University of Houston, Adela de la Torre at San Diego State University and Mary Papazian at San Jose State were the only women presidents of color at an FBS school in 2020.

The report also notes one of the pivotal moments of the past season, when Vanderbilt kicker Sarah Fuller became the first woman to play in a Power 5 football game.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States