Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

Johnson on target with Keystone job loss claim

- Nusaiba Mizan USA TODAY NETWORK-WISCONSIN

On his first day in office, President Joe Biden signed an executive order revoking the March 2019 permit for the Keystone XL Pipeline.

The pipeline was to carry crude oil from Alberta, Canada, to Steele City, Nebraska, where it would connect with another leg stretching to Gulf Coast refineries. The pipeline is opposed by environmen­tal groups but had won federal approval under then-President Donald Trump.

Constructi­on began in 2020, but only a mile or so of the pipeline had been completed before Biden’s action. His order cited a 2015 review by the Department of State and then-President Barack Obama, which found the pipeline would not serve the U.S. national interest.

In the wake of the order, several Wisconsin politician­s criticized the move as a job-killer for, yes, Wisconsin. That’s because two state-based companies had a contract to work on the project. (House Republican­s introduced a bill to bring back the pipeline on Feb. 2).

In a Jan. 21 post on Facebook, U.S. Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wisconsin, listed a series of things that would be lost with the end of the project, including “10,000 union jobs (nearly 2,000 with Wisconsin companies).”

Let’s zero in on the last part. Would ending the pipeline cost nearly 2,000 union jobs with Wisconsin companies?

Where the numbers come from

In its November 2015 report, the State Department wrote that only 50 jobs would be required to maintain the pipeline after constructi­on — 35 full-time jobs and 15 contractor­s. So the majority of the jobs for the Keystone pipeline would be short-term and constructi­onrelated.

At the time, the report noted the pipeline would lead to 3,900 direct constructi­on jobs. Of course, that number may have risen in the intervenin­g five years, and in claims about the economic impact of projects, secondary-jobs are often considered.

When asked for backup, Johnson’s office pointed to two online posts.

One post, from Sept. 3, 2020, was by Michels Corp., based in Brownsvill­e, Wisconsin. The other, dated Jan. 5, was on the website for the Keystone XL Pipeline, run by TransCanad­a PipeLines Ltd. (TransCanad­a is an affiliate of Canadabase­d TC Energy Corp., which was to own the pipeline with the Alberta government.)

The Michels Corp. post said the company would employ more than 350 people on facilities projects during peak constructi­on. The career page on the company’s website says Michels offers both union and nonunion jobs.

The TransCanad­a/Keystone page includes a quote from Bobby Poteete, president of Precision Pipeline, an Eau Claire-based subsidiary of Floridabas­ed MasTec Inc.:

“We are extremely proud to put PPL employees and more than 1,600 American union members to work on completing this important infrastruc­ture project …”

Later, that post includes, “PPL will be responsibl­e for hiring an estimated 1,600 union workers over the two-year constructi­on period.”

So over the course of constructi­on, that will be a total of 1,950 jobs — or “nearly” 2,000 jobs — provided by Wisconsin companies.

We reached out to Michels and Precision Pipeline, but neither responded.

The Wisconsin companies were chosen alongside three Texas companies and a Montana company in October 2020 by TC Energy.

Johnson’s claim could lead readers to believe the jobs would be permanent, or that 2,000 are already at risk.

But the jobs involved are temporary, constructi­on ones. And the total number would fluctuate over the course of the project. For instance, Michaels said it would be employing the 350 workers only when they reached peak constructi­on.

What’s more, the jobs would also likely be outside Wisconsin, because the pipeline’s path is through Montana, South Dakota and Nebraska. So that would lessen the impact on the state of any lost jobs — and related spending power — due to Biden’s action.

Our ruling

Johnson said in a Facebook post that shutting down the constructi­on of the Keystone pipeline would result in “nearly 2,000 (union jobs lost) with Wisconsin companies”

Based on the informatio­n we could find, the number checks out. Two Wisconsin companies were among the six that have been awarded constructi­on contracts, and roughly 2,000 jobs are involved. That said, readers could have easily understood Johnson to mean permanent jobs, when they would be only temporary. And the total represents a peak, not current jobs.

We rate his claim Mostly True.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States