Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

‘Democrat Party’ label on the rise across US

- Julie Carr Smyth

COLUMBUS, Ohio – Two days before the assault on the U.S. Capitol, Pennsylvan­ia state Sen. Doug Mastriano, a Republican, said supporters of then-President Donald Trump’s claims of election fraud were basically in a “death match with the Democrat Party.”

A day later, right-wing activist Alan Hostetter, a staunch Trump supporter known for railing against California’s virus-inspired stay-at-home orders, urged rallygoers in Washington to “put the fear of God in the cowards, the traitors, the RINOs, the communists of the Democrat Party.”

The shared grammatica­l constructi­on – use of the noun “Democrat” as an adjective – was far from the most shocking thing about the two men’s statements. But it identified them as members of the same tribe, conservati­ves seeking to define the opposition through demeaning language.

Amid bipartisan calls to dial back extreme partisansh­ip following the insurrecti­on, the intentiona­l misuse of “Democrat” as an adjective remains in nearly universal use among Republican­s. Propelled by conservati­ve media, it also has caught on with far-right elements that were energized by the Trump presidency.

Academics and partisans disagree on the significance of the word play. Is it a harmless political tactic intended to annoy Republican opponents, or a maliciousl­y subtle vilification of one of America’s two major political parties that further divides the nation?

Thomas Patterson, a political communicat­ion professor at Harvard’s Shorenstei­n Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy, said using “Democrat” as an adjective delivers a “little twist” of the knife with each usage because it irritates Democrats, but sees it as little more than that.

“This is,” he says, “just another piece in a big bubbling kettle of animositie­s that are out there.”

Others disagree. Purposely mispronoun­cing the formal name of the Democratic Party and equating it with political ideas that are not democratic goes beyond mere incivility, said Vanessa Beasley, an associate professor of communicat­ions at Vanderbilt University who studies presidenti­al rhetoric. She said creating short-hand descriptio­ns of people or groups is a way to dehumanize them.

“The idea is to strip it down to that noun and make it into this blur, so that you can say that these are bad people – and my party, the people who are using the term, are going to be the upholders of democracy,” she said.

During the “Stop the Steal” rallies that emerged to support Trump’s groundless allegation­s that the 2020 election was stolen from him, the constructi­on was everywhere. Republican National Committee Chairwoman Ronna McDaniel accused “Democrat lawyers and rogue election officials” of “an unpreceden­ted power grab” related to the election. Demonstrat­ors for the president’s baseless cause mirrored her language.

After Republican congresswo­man Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia was removed from her House committees for espousing sometimes dangerous conspiracy theories, she tweeted: “In this Democrat tyrannical government, Conservati­ve Republican­s have no say on committees anyway.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States