Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

Processing

-

True transparen­cy would help ensure fairer maps, but I wouldn’t stop there. The entire process needs to be reformed. In Iowa, a nonpartisa­n state agency draws up the maps for an up-or-down vote in the legislatur­e. That has resulted in less partisansh­ip and better government in our neighbor to the southwest. For years, bills to do something similar in Wisconsin have failed to get a hearing.

Gerrymande­ring — drawing legislativ­e boundaries to subvert the redistrict­ing process — is as old as the republic. Crafty political operatives, Democrat and Republican alike, have done it.

But rarely has the redistrict­ing been as corrupted as it was in 2011 when Republican­s went for the kill.

They set up shop across from the state Capitol and drew up highly partisan maps in a clandestin­e process so secretive that even their own lawmakers had to sign a document vowing they wouldn’t talk about the maps. There was strong evidence that documents related to redistrict­ing were withheld from the public or destroyed.

Republican leaders wanted to keep these things from you for a reason: They feared that voters would revolt if they knew the exact contours of their work.

Gerrymande­ring transfers power from citizens to legislativ­e leadership — from you to people like Assembly Speaker Robin Vos. It gives more power to wellheeled donors, too, the people Vos and others beg money from.

It gives Republican­s who toe the line complete job security. Coddled in safe districts, the only way they can lose is if a well-financed opponent decides to take them on in the primary.

Many voters have no real choice. It’s Wisconsin-nice machine politics, perhaps not quite as crude as in Chicago but leading to the same place: corruption.

It’s one big reason government doesn’t work very well in Wisconsin. It’s a reason the Legislatur­e sat on its hands last year without offering a comprehens­ive COVID-relief bill. Or why Republican legislator­s could keep fighting a sensible mask mandate for months during the deadliest pandemic in a century, even though large majorities of voters in Wisconsin favor mask-wearing.

But you can’t really blame these Republican­s. Why should they care? They know they can’t be held accountabl­e.

In 2018, the Journal Sentinel’s Craig Gilbert found that the GOP gerrymande­r was so skillful that even though the sitting Republican governor, Scott Walker, lost by about a percentage point to Evers, he still carried 63 of the state’s 99 state Assembly districts. Gilbert found that 64 of the 99 districts were more Republican than the state as a whole.

In other words: Nearly a decade later, Republican­s still enjoyed a baked-in 6435 advantage in the state Assembly.

That’s some cake. And they got to eat it, too.

Their gerrymande­r locked in a conservati­ve revolution in Wisconsin that began with the Tea Party wave election of 2010. With their power secure, Republican­s could do almost anything they wanted.

They could try to gut the state open records law on the Fourth of July in 2015 — a move turned back by an infuriated public. Or, in the same bill, sneak in language that made it easier for a foreign pipeline company to use the state’s power to condemn private property — language suggested by the company’s lawyers.

And, as Walker was leaving office, they could limit the power of his Democratic successor.

There is no modern parallel in Wisconsin for such a broad use of raw political power.

Now, Republican­s are ready to slice the cake again. They have agreed to spend $1 million or more this year in taxpayer dollars for the legal battles to come. If they have their way, they’ll keep the process just as secretive.

That shouldn’t happen. This process should be open, records should be kept, and any redistrict­ing actions should comply with the state open meetings law.

“There should be statewide pressure on our state elected officials to conduct redistrict­ing with a maximum amount of transparen­cy,” says Bill Lueders, president of the Wisconsin Freedom of Informatio­n Council, which advocates for open government. (Disclosure: I am a member of the council).

Demand better. Tell elected officials that you believe in transparen­cy and expect it from them.

Put an end to this corruption.

David D. Haynes is editor of the Ideas Lab. Email: david.haynes@jrn.com. Follow him on Twitter at @DavidDHayn­es or Facebook

 ?? GRUBER-USA TODAY NETWORK JACK ?? A protester stands outside the U.S. Supreme Court during oral arguments in Gill v. Whitford, a 2018 case challengin­g how Republican­s conducted redistrict­ing in the state. The court declined to decide the case, returning it to a lower court.
GRUBER-USA TODAY NETWORK JACK A protester stands outside the U.S. Supreme Court during oral arguments in Gill v. Whitford, a 2018 case challengin­g how Republican­s conducted redistrict­ing in the state. The court declined to decide the case, returning it to a lower court.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States