Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

Blame Biden for inflation? Most spending predates him

- Jon Greenberg

With a vote on raising the federal debt limit looming, Florida Republican Sen. Rick Scott is pressing the case that spending has to come down. In Scott’s view, there’s clear proof that Democratic fiscal policies have already made it harder for average families to pay their bills.

“Thanks to the insane tax-andspendin­g spree of President Joe Biden and Democrats in Washington, we are seeing six straight months of raging inflation,” Scott said in a July 26 news release.

Senate Republican­s, led by Scott, followed that up with a news conference on inflation. Scott pointed to a chart showing rising prices for household essentials, like gasoline, milk and eggs.

Prices have gone up, in some cases, sharply. Gasoline costs 45% more than a year ago. (Energy prices can jump up and down rapidly.) Used cars and trucks are also up 45%.

Compared with a year ago, the consumer price index was up 5.4% in June, the fastest pace since August 2008.

There’s no question that high levels of government spending can fuel inflation. But the spending that has occurred since Biden took office, primarily through the American Rescue Plan, accounts for just a part of new government spending over the past 18 months.

Other potential factors are also at play in raising prices: short-term supply interrupti­ons, labor shortages, tariffs on imported goods or simply the cyclical growth in consumer demand when the economy is recovering from a downturn.

Economists looking at today’s inflation caution that the precise cause is hard to pin down and they vary on how much impact the most recent spending is having.

But all of them underscore that heavy spending isn’t just a Biden administra­tion phenomenon. It started over a year ago, as the government tried to protect Americans and the economy from the ravages of COVID-19.

Government spending

In reviewing Washington’s actions, we look at actual spending, rather than the maximum amount allowed under any measure. That’s because where inflation is concerned, what matters is when the money gets into people’s pockets.

There have been several major coronaviru­s relief packages. The largest was the CARES Act, passed in March 2020 and signed by President Donald Trump. According to the Covid Money Tracker from the Committee for a Responsibl­e Federal Budget, that bill has put $1.97 trillion into the economy to date.

The CARES Act provided such pillars of federal aid as the Paycheck Protection Program for companies and their workers, and expanded unemployme­nt benefits for the millions of people who lost their jobs.

Congress refilled the Paycheck Protection Program in April 2020, along with other aid, at a cost of about $500 billion.

In December 2020, Congress passed additional relief, including $600 checks for most Americans. About $770 billion has been spent so far.

The most recent bill was the American Rescue Plan Act championed by Biden and congressio­nal Democrats and signed in March. So far, spending from that has reached $1.05 trillion.

The U.S. Treasury Department’s COVID-19 page shows that overall, as of the end of May, federal agencies had spent or committed about $3.5 trillion since the pandemic began. The Committee for a Responsibl­e Federal Budget, using different methods, puts the latest tally at about $4.45 trillion.

There are other amounts that can be folded into the totals, but it’s safe to say about two-thirds of the spending took place before Biden took office.

“I wouldn’t ascribe the government spending necessaril­y to Biden, as the increase in government spending to help curb the effects of COVID was already occurring during the Trump administra­tion,” said Columbia University economist Jennifer La’O.

Inflation trends

Scott spoke of “six straight months of raging inflation.” That’s an exaggerati­on. The consumer price index has been rising this year, but on a month-to-month basis, inflation didn’t start accelerati­ng significantly until March. (We look at month-to-month changes, rather than year-over-year, because 2020 was such an unusual year.)

In January, prices went up 0.3%. February’s increase was 0.4%. That’s lower than in June and July the year before.

But between March and June this year, the Consumer Price Index had an average monthly increase of 0.7%.

The prices of some goods, such as gasoline and used cars, have gone up dramatical­ly. Other increases are more modest, but they’re still important for household budgets. Grocery prices are up 0.9%. Clothing is nearly 5% more expensive.

Across the board, the cost of living rose 0.9%. Economy watchers look less at that top-line number and more at what is driving it. It turns out the used cars and trucks accounted for a third of the overall increase in the CPI. Federal Reserve Bank chairman Jerome Powell said that’s unlikely to last.

“Used car prices are going up because of sort of a perfect storm of very strong demand and limited supply,” Powell said at a June 16 news conference.

A global shortage of semiconduc­tor chips has curtailed vehicle production and thinned new-car inventorie­s, so more buyers have turned to used car and trucks, pushing up prices in that market. Eventually, Powell said, supply chains will get back on track and the surge will ease. That’s what happened with an earlier spike in lumber prices.

There is a risk of more deeply embedded inflation, but there are few signs of that so far.

Biden, spending and inflation

Economics 101 holds that when you add hundreds of billions of dollars to an economy, at least some people will go out and buy things. If supply doesn’t ramp up at a commensura­te pace, increased demand will lead to higher prices.

Macroecono­mist John Leahy at the University of Michigan thinks Washington’s spending since last spring is fueling that type of cycle.

“The root cause of inflation is most likely the increase in aggregate demand for goods, and this increase in demand has been caused in part by the increase in government spending,” Leahy said. “Supply bottleneck­s help to explain why supply has not kept pace with demand, but they are not prime mover.”

Stanford University economist Peter Klenow has no quibble with that basic idea, but he says he’s skeptical that much of this tracks back to Biden. Klenow points to studies like one from the New York Federal Reserve that found that only about 30% of stimulus money was spent on goods. About 70% of the money went into savings or paid down debt. That money wouldn’t spur demand or lead to higher prices.

Klenow also doubts that a relief package passed in March would drive up inflation just three months later.

“Estimates of the effects of government spending in earlier years typically find a lag of a year or two between the spending and any noticeable effect on inflation,” Klenow said.

One final point on inflation and tax policy: Scott talked about Democrats’ “tax and spending spree.” While Biden has said he would like to raise taxes on corporatio­ns and on people making over $400,000 a year, that has yet to happen.

That aside, Leahy said that in the short run, taxes tend to trim demand and reduce inflationary pressures.

“Tax hikes on consumers reduce disposable income and thereby reduce consumer spending,” Leahy said. “Tax hikes on business tend to reduce profits and thereby reduce investment.”

We reached out to Scott’s office to ask about the role of taxes and Biden’s spending and did not hear back.

Our ruling

Scott said, “Thanks to the insane tax-and-spending spree of President Joe Biden and Democrats in Washington, we are seeing six straight months of raging inflation.”

Inflation is up, and there’s broad agreement that government spending has been a factor.

However, most of the big spending coursing through the economy took place before Biden and the Democrats were in charge in Washington. In the past, there’s been a lag of one to two years between higher government spending and higher inflation. The massive relief package in March has had little time to spur inflation.

As for taxes, they haven’t gone up. And if they had, that would tend to put the brakes on inflation.

We rate this claim Mostly False.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States