Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

Then don’t do the crime

- Brookfield Downsville

Senator Johnson’s uneasy relationsh­ip with science

In his last poorly timed rant about the failings of Dr. Anthony Fauci, Sen. Ron Johnson again demonstrat­ed his ignorance of science (“Johnson criticizes Fauci on ’80s AIDS threat,” Dec. 7).

Johnson seems clueless about the scientific method and has fostered misunderst­anding in people who still listen to him. Because of this he sees Fauci’s change in stance on HIV in the 80’s and COVID-19 now as flip-flopping.

The reality is that in a health crisis that’s yet to be understood, the point person does his or her best to convey what science knows at a particular point in time for the sake of public safety. The beauty of science is that it evolves as informatio­n is gathered and tested. Eventually, consensus in the scientific community is reached and better guidance results. And even that may change down the road.

I wish the senator would brush up on the workings of science before he utters another word having to do with this topic. Until then I’ll listen to Fauci, and Johnson, not so much.

D. Anderson

Milwaukee

Barrett failed the neighborho­ods

Last weekend, I had an opportunit­y to visit downtown Milwaukee and the neighborho­ods on the north side near the residence of the late Mayor Frank Zeidler.

Afterward, I picked up the Dec. 5 Journal Sentinel and read the piece in the Ideas Lab focused on Mayor Tom Barrett and his pending appointmen­t as ambassador to Luxembourg (“Ambassador Tom Barrett: A change of address for Milwaukee’s long-serving mayor”).

It was the visit, then the article, that prompted me to write. I was horrified by the condition of these north-side neighborho­ods. In these neighborho­ods I saw blowing trash, trash in the alleys, furniture dumped in public view. The city streets are in a condition more befitting a Third World country than a city of neighborho­ods, with heaving pavement and large potholes. Sidewalks and curbs? The same pathetic condition.

From 1988 to 2021 Milwaukee has been governed by two mayors/neighborho­od activists who championed neighborho­ods. Yet, under both, the city streets were and are a joke. You want to make the neighborho­ods look better? Start by rebuilding the basic infrastruc­ture (streets, sidewalks) and even the challenged neighborho­ods start to look better.

Historian John Gurda, in his piece, notes his unabashed admiration of Barrett

but correctly notes no signature plan or program over the past 17 years. That is not sufficient, and I hope the people expect more from their mayor. As I drove the crumbling streets of Milwaukee’s north side I kept thinking, “where has the mayor been all this time?” The crumbling basics of Milwaukee’s neighborho­ods is a civic embarrassm­ent.

This is not a suburban issue. This is a city issue. And maybe Milwaukee should elect a new mayor who will dedicate his or her time to rebuilding the basic infrastruc­ture of the poorest of neighborho­ods. The last two didn’t get the job done.

And just maybe more big shiny objects downtown and on the lakefront should be put on the back burner until the rest of the city is rebuilt.

James Casey Fort Myers, FL

A dismaying court ruling on maps

I was dismayed but not surprised that the Wisconsin Supreme Court voted 4-3 to basically maintain the current legislativ­e district maps (“Court plans few map changes,” Dec. 1).

The most specious argument seems to have come from Justice Rebecca Bradley who contended that the justices must make as few changes as a way to “respect the past choices lawmakers have made.”

Where was the respect shown to lawmakers 10 years ago when the maps where drawn behind closed doors using computer algorithms known only to a few? Where was the respect shown to the voters of Wisconsin who have repeatedly voiced their desire to eliminate partisan redistrict­ing?

Bradley further contends, “Claims of political unfairness in the maps present political questions not legal ones.” She further states that the questions, “must be resolved through the political process and not by the judiciary.”

But how can voters use the political process when the current political process has essentiall­y been stripped of meaning?

Is not the right to vote a legal question? Is not the right to have all votes counted equally a legal question? How can issues so fundamenta­l to our democracy not have the weight of a “legal” question to this court?

The outrageous maps created 10 years ago removed any chance of reform through the political process. The Wisconsin Supreme Court has just placed our democracy on very thin ice for another 10 years. With global warming, it is unclear just how long this ice will even last.

Mark Gennis

Mequon

In Daniel Bice’s article on Nov. 26 referencin­g the Waukesha parade tragedy, it stated that “the liberal prosecutor believes that cash bail is harmful to poor defendants who often can’t afford to pay the sum set by judges for their release from jail before their trial” (“GOP takes aim at Chisholm over bail”).

Well that is too bad. If you can’t do the time, don’t do the crime!

Here’s a thought: Just don’t do the crime to begin with. They can’t afford to pay — well, society can’t afford these tragedies.

Bob Hutson North Prairie

Administra­tors must share blame

As a retired teacher, I view the administra­tion’s role in the school shootings in Michigan to be as crucial to the outcome as the parents (“Suspect’s parents charged in Michigan school shooting,” Dec. 4).

The administra­tion had received informatio­n from two teachers relaying concerns about the student who had drawn a picture depicting violence and was searching on his phone for ammunition. When the parents refused to take the boy home, administra­tors simply sent him back to class. We know he did not go to class.

So many times teachers are the ones to bear the brunt for dealing with troubled children in the classroom while the school administra­tion abdicates its role in discipline, interventi­on and ensuring safety.

Lee Ann Kingston

Shorewood

Wisconsin: Allow third-party solar

I thought the Dec. 5 article “Community systems offer solar alternativ­es” by John Flesher was an important piece.

As the article pointed out, a number of other states have already allowed for solar alternativ­es. Minnesota has implemente­d these alternativ­e systems since 2013. Wisconsin needs to implement third-party solar systems, especially in communitie­s needing lower utility bills and experienci­ng more air pollution from nearby industries.

Wisconsin at this time has not allowed for third-party utilities. In the past year, however, two state senators have introduced community solar legislatio­n, which needs to be supported and implemente­d by the Legislatur­e. Community solar systems can be economical for citizens, businesses, churches and schools with an increase in jobs and creation of new businesses. It can provide cleaner air and better health for Wisconsini­tes.

As Flesher’s article stated, we can have cleaner, cheaper and more equitable systems if we build smaller local energy resources. This is very much needed, especially at this time.

Nancy Kriofsky

Put the Packers in charge

Politics is broken and not likely to unbreak anytime soon. While many continue to diagnose our disease with elaborate explanatio­ns and theories, I have been busy working on a solution. Let’s ditch the politician­s and hire the Packers to run state and local government.

The Packers follow the rules. They don’t make new ones. No more gerrymande­ring. No more bogus vote recounts. The Packers know how to win. Sure, we have had our bad games and bad years, but the Packers are winners. Period. End of story.

The Packers are consistent. The Packers are impervious to political winds, campaign contributi­ons and political divides. The Packers make large investment­s in training and education. The Packers know the value of talent. And they know it costs money. They know how to get the best from their players.

The Packers don’t discrimina­te. They know how to get folks from diverse background­s to work together for a common goal. Unlike Wisconsin politician­s, the Packers don’t focus on dividing factions along political affiliation, geographic area or racial and ethnic lines.

The Packers know how to budget and spend within their means. The Packers have a cap on how much they can spend. They have to get the most out of the money they have. The Packers would know how to set a budget and use it wisely year after year.

The Packers don’t hoard money and give it to only a few. The Packers aren’t owned by a rich billionair­e like every other team. They are owned by the community. They don’t take their profits and give it to one person. They invest their profits in the team and their community.

The Packers aren’t whiners and sore losers. And the Packers know how to unite people (with the exception of Bear and Viking fans).

The way we are going, we’re not gonna make it. Let’s hire the Packers now before it’s too late!

Go Pack Go!

William McMahon

Please email your letters to jsedit@jrn.com, or mail them to Letters to the editor, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, P.O. Box 371, Milwaukee, Wis. 53201-0371. Letters should be about 200 words.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States