Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

Lawmakers hope bills ease stresses on workforce

Quality housing seen as part of path to solution

- Natalie Brophy

As employers struggle to find enough workers, many companies, municipali­ties and economic developmen­t organizati­ons are focusing on recruiting employees from outside the state and keeping workers in Wisconsin.

But as they seek to fill open jobs and build the state’s workforce, communitie­s often lack a key recruitmen­t tool: quality housing that workers can afford. In an effort to combat the issue, Wisconsin Republican­s are sponsoring a package of bills aimed at making workforce housing easier and cheaper to build across the state.

Workforce housing is defined as housing that is affordable to households earning between 60% and 120% of an area’s median income. It targets middle-income employees, those who often work in fields such as law enforcemen­t, manufactur­ing, education, health care and retail.

“There’s a worker shortage in many of our communitie­s and businesses are trying to attract people to their communitie­s; they’re trying to find more workers,” said Rep. Dave Murphy, R-Greenville, who cosponsore­d many of the bills. “And many times, it comes back to the fact that there’s not enough moderately priced housing. So we’re trying to help increase the stock of homes that would fit into the budget of the average workforce.”

The package of bills was approved by the state Assembly in October and was sent to the Senate, which has not yet taken up the measures. The Senate will reconvene for its next session on Jan. 18.

Their sponsors say the bills look to encourage developmen­t of new workforce housing by lowering costs, making it easier to build, and reducing government red tape by:

Creating a $42 million per year workforce housing income tax credit for multi-family housing projects.

Creating a certified workforce housing developmen­t site program that would pre-qualify properties for residentia­l developmen­t that have a clean title, proper zoning, adequate utilities and infrastruc­ture and no wetlands, and that the developer can attest to limited per-unit developmen­t fees and that all required permits can be in place within 60 days of certification.

Requiring larger municipali­ties to use a portion of their federal pandemic relief funds on one of the following workforce housing projects: new infrastruc­ture, such as streets, sewer,

water and sidewalks; establishi­ng a low-interest or no-interest loan program for rehabilita­ting older workforce housing; establishi­ng a low-interest or no-interest loan program for building new workforce housing; redevelopi­ng idle commercial property sites of at least 40,000 square feet to workforce housing.

Creating a sales tax exemption for materials used to build workforce housing developmen­ts or to conduct workforce housing rehabilita­tion projects.

Creating a low-interest or no-interest loan program for homeowners to pay for structural improvemen­ts or the removal of lead paint from homes built before 1980.

Allowing local government­s to create housing investment fund programs that would use increased property tax revenue from new housing developmen­ts to help fund additional workforce housing.

The majority of the bills were passed by the Assembly by unanimous consent, although lawmakers split along party lines on one bill, Assembly Bill 605, which requires municipali­ties to use a portion of their federal pandemic relief dollars to help fund housing developmen­t.

In an emailed statement, Assembly Minority Leader Gordon Hintz, D-Oshkosh, said the bills do not adequately address the state’s housing challenges and could in some instances make the problem worse.

“Governor Evers’ original budget proposed $70 million to fight homelessne­ss, including $50 million for grants for municipali­ties to offer affordable housing, and I was deeply disappoint­ed when Republican­s voted to cut these funds,” Hintz said in the statement.

However Republican Rep. Rob Summerfield, who spearheade­d the package, said the bills look at the housing issue from a “holistic approach.”

“We knew from the get-go you’re not gonna be able to pass one bill to take care of this issue,” Summerfield said. “You’re not gonna have a silver bullet saying, ‘we do this one thing and all our problems are alleviated.’ This is where talking to the industry, talking to community groups, talking to everybody who’s got a stake in this and taking their idea, saying, ‘we can do a little here, a little here, a little there.’ And after a while, you start to get a bigger stack of bills that hopefully will make a difference in in this issue.”

Rep. David Armstrong, R-Rice Lake, who authored several of the bills, also works as the executive director of the Barron County Economic Developmen­t Corp. He said he’s seen firsthand how businesses struggle to find employees,

“We knew from the get-go you’re not gonna be able to pass one bill to take care of this issue. You’re not gonna have a silver bullet saying, ‘we do this one thing and all our problems are alleviated.’” GOP Rep. Rob Summerfield

which “goes hand-in-hand with the housing shortage.”

Armstrong sees the bills as the state Legislatur­e’s way of giving municipali­ties tools they need to help developers build in their communitie­s, he said.

What many of the bills aim to do is cut down on government regulation­s that drive up the cost of housing. According to a 2021 study from the National Associatio­n of Homebuilde­rs, government regulation­s account for nearly 24% of the current average sales price ($397,300) of a new single-family home.

“As a government, we can’t affect supply and demand, we can’t affect supply chain really, but what we can affect is the cost of what government does and how it impacts the cost of housing,” said Assembly Majority Leader Jim Steinke, R-Kaukauna.

The Wisconsin Economic Developmen­t Associatio­n, a statewide trade associatio­n for economic developmen­t profession­als, supports several of the bills included in the package.

“I think they certainly can have a significant impact on making Wisconsin a more desirable place to live,” said Michael Welsh, WEDA’s vice president of legislativ­e affairs. “I think it’s good public public policy.”

If thr bills are passed into law, the average Wisconsini­te likely won’t notice any immediate impacts, Welsh said. But over time, these bills could help small businesses thrive through employee retention and attraction, grow communitie­s and increase tax bases.

“This is part of an overall effort to address Wisconsin’s workforce shortage crisis,” Welsh said. “And I think that no one can deny that we’re experienci­ng that. I don’t think we’re unique in Wisconsin. I think other states are also feeling that pinch. But I think these bills represent an effort to address some of the underlying issues that, that speak to our our workforce shortage. Hopefully, in the new year, there’ll be some action in the Senate and get these bills to the governor’s desk.”

The bills face an uphill battle in the Senate, as numerous Republcan senators have concerns, according to a WEDA news release.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States