Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

Past COVID to count as immunity in GOP bill

Legislatio­n faces veto, pushback from experts

- Molly Beck

MADISON – Republican lawmakers want Wisconsin employers to accept a past COVID-19 infection to meet vaccine and testing requiremen­ts aimed at protecting their workforces and to allow workers who don’t comply with such mandates to qualify for unemployme­nt benefits if they are fired.

The legislatio­n is being advanced as Wisconsin enters one of the most threatenin­g points of the coronaviru­s pandemic, with record-setting infections and nearly 80% of hospital intensive care units at peak capacity.

Four states led by Republican governors changed eligibilit­y rules for unemployme­nt benefits in recent weeks to include workers who did not comply with vaccine mandates. And three states now require employers to accept a past COVID-19 infection as part of their vaccine and testing rules.

Gov. Tony Evers has signaled he would veto such legislatio­n.

Wisconsin bill author Rep. Cody Horlacher of Mukwonago and Sen. Mary Felzkowski of Irma are proposing to allow employers to accept documentat­ion signed by a health care provider showing that the individual tested positive for COVID-19, or showing a serology test that demonstrat­es the presence of naturally occurring antibodies.

The proposal also would give employers the option to take their employees’ word on having antibodies by accepting a notarized letter written by the workers as proof of a past infection.

Health officials and epidemiolo­gists say the proposals could encourage Wisconsin residents to avoid becoming vaccinated at a time of high virus transmissi­on, thereby extending the pandemic.

“As a policy, this is bad public health practice,” said Patrick Remington, a former epidemiolo­gist for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and director of the University of Wisconsin-Madison’s preventive medicine residency program.

“When you get a viral infection, such as one from the SARS-CoV2 virus, our body responds with an immune response, and this ‘natural’ immunity protects against future infections. But this protection comes at a very high cost to society.”

The Wisconsin bill authors argue the legislatio­n seeks to legitimize immunity from a prior infection as a form of protection during the new surge, allows employers to avoid staffing losses, and provides stability to those who lose their jobs.

“It’s important that the state of Wisconsin understand­s and recognizes that natural immunity is a real thing and that it works,” Horlacher said during a public hearing held Tuesday on

the bill in the Senate Committee on Labor and Regulatory Reform.

“This bill seeks to give another tool in the toolbox not only for employees who are potentiall­y looking at facing the loss of employment, but also employers who are looking to just do the right thing and maintain their workforce.”

Felzkowski cited the European Union’s decision to include COVID-19 recovery in their Digital COVID Certificate program and an Israeli study showing a past infection was more protective than vaccines in reducing the risk of infection and illness from the delta variant of the coronaviru­s.

“This is not a question of should we be vaccinated or shouldn’t we be vaccinated ... there is science that supports vaccinatio­n and there is science that supports natural immunity, and (the bill) allows individual people options,” she said.

Ajay Sethi, an infectious disease epidemiolo­gist and associate professor in the Department of Population Health Sciences at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, said overall, immunity from past infection is not as reliable as protection from a vaccine.

“Unlike the reliable and longer duration of protection provided by vaccinatio­n, the quality of protection after natural infection is less and varies greatly from person to person,” Sethi said. “Immunity from past infection weakens over time, and it does so more quickly than the immunity provided by vaccinatio­n.” Sethi said people with milder infection have less protection than people who experience more severe illness and survive. He also cited a study from September of 72 people who had previously tested positive that showed about one-third did not develop any antibodies at all.

“Even if someone’s past illness required hospitaliz­ation, the chance of reinfectio­n is 5.5 times higher if unvaccinat­ed as compared to someone who is vaccinated and never had infection before,” Sethi said.

The seven-day average of new COVID-19 cases reached more than 9,000 infections this week, 2,566 more than the average during last fall which had been the pandemic peak until a recent surge of cases fueled by the new omicron variant of the coronaviru­s.

Hospitaliz­ations are on pace to surpass last fall’s peak, too, with the unvaccinat­ed accounting for the vast majority of COVID-19 patients.

President Joe Biden in November required employers of at least 100 workers and health care workers to implement vaccine-or-testing rules or face financial penalties.

The federal directive has been challenged, including by a large Wisconsin employer, and a majority of the U.S. Supreme Court signaled Friday it is skeptical of the Biden administra­tion’s authority in the matter.

“The nature and scope of the mandates being faced by workers today is unpreceden­ted,” Sen. Duey Stroebel, RTown of Cedarburg, said Tuesday to argue in favor of his legislatio­n to make fired workers eligible for unemployme­nt benefits.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States