GOP opens ‘weaponization’ probe
WASHINGTON – House Republicans launched the marquee investigation of their new majority Thursday with a brazen assertion that the federal government has been used against conservatives, drawing in current and former lawmakers to make a sprawling – and at times convoluted – case that national security officials, social media companies and the news media have been conspiring against them.
The first hearing of the new House panel on what Republicans assert is the “weaponization” of government, led by Republican Rep. Jim Jordan of Ohio, featured partisan and sometimes misleading or inaccurate testimony about 2016 election interference, COVID-19 and the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack, including from two top Senate Republicans. Much of it focused on grievances about actions taken by federal officials when former President Donald Trump was in office.
“It’s clear to me that the Justice Department and the FBI are suffering from a political infection that, if it’s not defeated, will cause the American people to no longer trust these storied institutions,” said Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa, the former chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, in rare testimony to the House committee.
Rather than focusing on new information, the hearing delved into longstanding conservative complaints about the Trump-Russia investigation and misjudgments by FBI officials, including anti-Trump text messages, that have been documented for years. The FBI officials whose names were repeatedly invoked have long since left the bureau.
Sweeping in scope, the new investigation is likely to test public appetite for the kind of partisan, aggressive oversight and investigations that Republicans have made the centerpiece of their new House majority agenda.
It amounts to a high-profile platform for Jordan, the panel’s chairman, who after years of leveling attacks against Justice Department officials of both parties now has a committee gavel of his own to elevate his criticism and turn it into action.
Jordan said the first panel – comprised of Grassley, Sen. Ron Johnson, RWis., and Tulsi Gabbard, a former congresswoman from Hawaii who left the
Democratic Party – was important in “framing it up.”
The second panel of lawyers and former FBI and Justice Department officials, Jordan said, documented the federal government’s “censorship by surrogate.”
He added, “Our whole objective was to sort of frame up how important this is and how serious it is. And I certainly think that happened.”
The hearing touched on a broad array of topics, some only loosely related, but laid bare Republicans’ desire to use the committee as a vehicle for attacking what they say are politically driven decisions not only in law enforcement but also by those in the technology and health care sectors.
It also showed the complexity of issues around free speech and the free flow of information on social media, as the government is forced to keep pace with the new ways Americans communicate their sometimes polarizing politics, views and beliefs.
Republicans attributed their claims of weaponization to private interviews with dozens of whistleblowers over the last two years, when they were in the minority.