Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

Carlson wrong about Biden administra­tion diversity

- Maria Ramirez Uribe

Fox News host Tucker Carlson criticized President Joe Biden’s federal judge nomination­s, calling them “racebased” and illegal.

“The point of diversity, equity and inclusion, as you’ve often heard, is to wind up with a leadership class that, quote, ‘looks like America,’” Carlson said Feb. 6 on “Tucker Carlson Tonight.” “Now, we think you should hire on the basis of merit. But, that’s kind of an appealing idea, the people who run the country should look like the country.”

But Carlson said that is not what Biden has done.

“Because no administra­tion has ever looked less like America, just by the numbers, than the Biden administra­tion,” Carlson said. “It’s not about making the administra­tion look like America, it’s about discrimina­ting against certain classes of people who don’t vote for them.”

This claim is now “provable,” Carlson said. We investigat­ed whether the Biden administra­tion is the least representa­tive of the American public and found it isn’t.

A Fox News spokespers­on pointed us to a tweet from Jeremy Carl, a senior fellow at the conservati­ve Claremont Institute that contained numbers focusing on white men and Black women that Carlson cited on his show.

“Out of 97 federal judges confirmed under Joe Biden, the total number of white men: five, 22 are Black women,” Carlson said, crediting Carl. “So this is race-based hiring.”

Biden and federal judiciary

Carlson’s raw numbers are pretty much right based on data from the Federal Judicial Center.

But these appointmen­ts have made the judicial system more representa­tive of U.S. demographi­cs, not less. And even then, the federal judiciary’s demographi­c makeup does not completely match the country’s. For example, there are 16 states with no federal judges of color.

The vast majority of the nearly 800 active federal judges are white. White men comprise about 46% of active federal judges and only 29% of the total U.S. population. Black women represent nearly 6% of the federal judiciary and about 7% of the U.S. population.

“President Biden is proud to have delivered historic progress concerning strengthen­ing the rule of law and standing up for all of our citizens; both are core American values,” White House deputy press secretary Andrew Bates told PolitiFact. He said Carlson’s statement lacks credibilit­y.

While campaignin­g, Biden promised to create an administra­tion that looked like the U.S. His Cabinet is more multiracia­l and gender-diverse than the Cabinets of his two predecesso­rs.

About 52% of Biden’s 25 Cabinet members are men and 48% are white, according to Inclusive America, a nonprofit that advocates for making the government more diverse. Men make up close to 50% of the U.S. population, and white people make up about 59%.

This is compared with former President Donald Trump’s initially confirmed Cabinet, which was 83% white and 83% male. Former President Barack Obama’s first Cabinet was 68% male and 54% white according to a PolitiFact analysis.

The Miller Center at the University of Virginia tracked “100 key staff positions in the Executive Office” during Biden’s first 300 days as president. These positions included the chief of staff, senior advisers and directors.

The group found 44% of the staffers were men, and 61% were white.

“My research shows record level diversity, how could it possibly look less like America?” said Kathryn Dunn Tenpas, the author of the Miller Center’s report and a senior fellow at the Brookings Institutio­n, a Washington, D.C., think tank. “To the contrary, a staff that includes more women and non-whites looks more like the broader population

base.”

Accounting for history

Outside of the specific demographi­c makeup of Biden’s administra­tion, Carlson’s claim fails to account for the country’s history. For nearly two centuries, women and Black people went completely unrepresen­ted in the executive and judicial branches of government, despite being a part of the overall U.S. population.

It wasn’t until the 1900s that women and Black people began filling positions in the president’s Cabinets and the federal judiciary.

● In 1928, President Calvin Coolidge appointed Genevieve Rose Cline to the U.S. Customs Court, now the U.S. Court of Internatio­nal Trade, becoming the first female federal judge.

● In 1937, William Henry Hastie became the first Black federal judge, after being appointed by President Franklin Delano Roosevelt to the Federal District Court in the Virgin Islands.

● In 1945, Frances Perkins became the first woman in a presidenti­al Cabinet. Roosevelt appointed her to be secretary of labor.

● In 1966, President Lyndon B. Johnson appointed the first Black person to serve in the Cabinet. Robert Weaver served as secretary of housing and urban developmen­t.

● In 1966, Constance Baker Motley became the first Black woman in the federal judiciary, appointed by Johnson. ● In 1976, Patricia Roberts Harris became the first Black woman in a presidenti­al Cabinet, serving as housing and urban developmen­t secretary under President Jimmy Carter.

Our ruling

Carlson said “no administra­tion has ever looked less like America, just by the numbers than the Biden administra­tion.”

This is wrong. Researcher­s have touted Biden’s administra­tion as one of the most diverse in the country’s history, thus looking more like the U.S. population.

The claim also fails to take into account that for nearly two centuries, only white men were represente­d in the Cabinet and the federal judiciary. Even though women and people of color lived in the country.

We rate this claim Pants on Fire!

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States