Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

‘An absurdity’: Experts criticize WHO handling of sex misconduct

- Maria Cheng and Al-Hadji Kudra Maliro

GOMA, Congo – Two experts appointed by the World Health Organizati­on to investigat­e allegation­s that some of its staffers sexually abused women during an Ebola outbreak in Congo dismissed the U.N. agency’s own efforts to excuse its handling of such misconduct as “an absurdity” on Monday, saying they were not satisfied that no senior officials have been fired.

Some of the victimized women say – nearly four years later – they are still waiting for the WHO to terminate those responsibl­e or be offered any financial compensati­on.

In October 2020, Aichatou Mindaoudou and Julienne Lusenge were named by WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesu­s to head a panel investigat­ing reports that some WHO staffers sexually abused or exploited women in a conflict-ridden region of Congo during the 2018-2020 Ebola outbreak.

Their review found there were at least 83 perpetrato­rs of abuse who worked for WHO and partners, including complaints of rape, forced abortions and the sexual assault of a 13year-old girl, in the biggest known sex abuse scandal in the U.N. health agency’s history.

The panel also found that three WHO managers mismanaged a sexual misconduct case first reported by The Associated Press, involving a U.N. doctor signing a contract to buy land for a woman he allegedly impregnate­d.

A confidential U.N. report submitted to the WHO last month concluded that the managers’ handling of that case didn’t violate WHO’s sexual exploitati­on policies, because the woman wasn’t considered a beneficiary of WHO aid since she didn’t receive any humanitari­an assistance.

“The restrictiv­e approach favored by WHO is an absurdity,” Mindaoudou and Lusenge said in a statement, adding that any gaps or ambiguity in those policies should be weighed in favor of the victim to ensure the agency is held accountabl­e.

Anifa, a Congolese woman who worked at an Ebola clinic in northeaste­rn Congo, said she was offered a job at double her salary in exchange for sex with a WHO doctor and was still traumatize­d by the experience.

“How many times do I have to speak before (the doctors) at WHO responsibl­e for the sexual abuse are punished?” she asked. “If WHO does not take radical measures, we will conclude that the organizati­on has been made rotten by rapists.”

Anifa, who didn’t share her last name for fear of reprisals, said she didn’t expect any financial compensati­on from the WHO, explaining that “money will not erase the wounds I have in my heart.” She reported the alleged misconduct to the WHO in 2019, but never received a response.

WHO chief Tedros has said repeatedly the agency has a “zero tolerance” policy for sexual misconduct.

Mindaoudou, a former government minister in Niger, and Lusenge, a human rights activist in Congo, also slammed the WHO for its failure to punish any senior staffers linked to the abuse.

“We are not satisfied,” they told the AP. “The ‘zero tolerance policy’ does not mean engaging in subterfuge to make sure no one is responsibl­e for sexual abuse and exploitati­on.”

Paula Donovan, who co-leads Code Blue, which seeks to hold the U.N. accountabl­e for sexual offenses, said it was striking that experts appointed by the WHO itself were so openly critical of the agency.

“Two courageous African women exposed sky-high levels of tolerance for misogyny and racism at the top of WHO,” she said. “Now it’s up to government­s to launch their own truly independen­t investigat­ion into the organizati­on’s leaders, beginning with Dr. Tedros, to root out the poison infecting WHO.”

When allegation­s of sexual abuse and exploitati­on surfaced in the press in September 2020, Tedros said he was “outraged” and that anyone found to be involved would face serious consequenc­es. WHO emergencie­s chief Dr. Michael Ryan claimed the agency had “absolutely no details” of the abuse.

But the internal U.N. report noted that Tedros was informed of sexual abuse allegation­s in 2019 and that some cases of alleged misconduct were discussed by senior WHO staff shortly after they occurred.

The WHO has refused to comment on the internal U.N. report and the agency created a new department to prevent misconduct after the Congo sex abuse scandal. Dr. Gaya Gamhewage, who heads that work, told U.N. investigat­ors that prior to being appointed, “sexual exploitati­on and abuse were not familiar terms to her.”

Tedros said earlier this month that the agency has establishe­d a $2 million fund to help survivors of sexual abuse in Congo, but it’s unclear how many women have obtained assistance.

Jeanette, a woman who says she was impregnate­d by a WHO doctor while working at an Ebola center in Butembo, said she was pressured into having an abortion, which nearly killed her. She said she is waiting for the WHO to punish the doctor responsibl­e for her pregnancy and has had no offers of financial compensati­on.

“I don’t have the strength to work since the abortion,” she said. “WHO should know that their staffers are flatterers, freeloader­s and liars.”

 ?? FRANK FRANKLIN II/AP FILE ?? Aichatou Mindaoudou, a former government minister in Niger, is one of two experts heading a panel investigat­ing reports WHO staffers sexually abused or exploited women in Congo.
FRANK FRANKLIN II/AP FILE Aichatou Mindaoudou, a former government minister in Niger, is one of two experts heading a panel investigat­ing reports WHO staffers sexually abused or exploited women in Congo.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States