A guide to George Santos’ dubious statements
PolitiFact has been tracking falsehoods in politics since 2007. But we’ve never seen anyone like U.S. Rep. George Santos.
Santos won a seat in the U.S. House in 2022, representing a district that includes portions of Queens and Long Island, New York. Some of his claims were scrutinized by a local publication called the North Shore Leader before the election. But they didn’t gain a wider audience until days after his election – and weeks before he was officially seated in Congress – when The New York Times and then a host of other media outlets dug into Santos’ background.
By now, the veracity of so many of Santos’ statements has been questioned that it’s become hard to keep track of what he has said. So, we compiled a list of the major ones, separated into several categories: whether Santos has acknowledged he lied, whether he has copped to exaggerating, whether he still says he’s telling the truth and whether not enough is known yet to determine whether one of his statements is accurate.
Lies that Santos acknowledged
• That he went to Baruch College and graduated in 2010 with a bachelor’s in economics and finance. Santos made this claim on a résumé and on an “about” page on his campaign website.
Santos later told the New York Post, “I didn’t graduate from any institution of higher learning. I’m embarrassed and sorry for having embellished my résumé.” This would also seem to be a backhanded acknowledgement that he never played college volleyball (or defeated Harvard) while there, either. Santos told British interviewer Piers Morgan that lying about his educational attainment was a “very stupid decision.”
He told Newsmax that he would not have gotten the Nassau County Republican Party’s nomination if the party had known he lacked a college degree.
• That he earned a Master of Business Administration degree from New York University in 2013, as he said on the same resume and campaign website.
Santos’ acknowledgement to the New York Post about not graduating from any higher learning institution also covers this claim.
• That he and his family owned 13 properties, which he claimed in a 2021 Twitter thread.
An extensive search of property records by The New York Times found no real estate holdings for Santos in the U.S. Santos later admitted to the New York Post that “George Santos does not own any properties.”
What Santos admits he exaggerated
• That he worked for Citigroup and Goldman Sachs. Santos’ campaign website said that after graduating, he “began working at Citigroup as an associate.” His tenure ran from 2011 to 2014, according to his résumé. The résumé also said Santos was a “project manager” at Goldman Sachs for about eight months in 2017.
However, both companies told the Times and other outlets that Santos was never their employee.
Santos has argued that he did work with Citigroup and Goldman Sachs, such as conference organizing, marketing and fundraising, but that he was not on staff at either company. He characterized his distinction between working with the companies and working for them as an “embellishment” in an interview with former Rep. Tulsi Gabbard, DHawaii, who was guest hosting on Tucker Carlson’s Fox News show.
Santos told Gabbard, who is now an independent, “I can sit down and explain to you what you can do in private equity, in capital intro, via servicing limited partners and general partners, and we can have this discussion that’s going to go way above the American people’s head. But that’s not what I campaigned on.”
He also told Newsmax that he “never lied” about his employment, saying he had “direct contracts for those firms.”
• That he had never been a drag performer in Brazil. After questions were raised about other aspects of his biography, media reports surfaced that Santos had competed as a drag queen in Brazilian beauty pageants 15 years earlier, and photographs of Santos in his drag persona, Kitara Ravache, were published.
Santos initially tweeted, “The most recent obsession from the media claiming that I am a drag Queen or ‘performed’ as a drag Queen is categorically false. The media continues to make outrageous claims about my life while I am working to deliver results. I will not be distracted nor fazed by this.”
Later, Santos offered a more nuanced explanation. He told Morgan he was in drag for “one day” rather than a “career performer.”
Santos argues that there was a distinction between his limited participation in drag and being a “drag queen.” While walking through LaGuardia Airport, he told reporters trailing him, “No, I was not a drag queen in Brazil, guys. I was young and I had fun at a festival. Sue me for having a life.”
• That he never said he’s part Jewish. In the interview with Morgan, Santos said, “I never claimed to be Jewish.” We rated this Pants on Fire!
On a half-dozen occasions, Santos unambiguously referred to himself as Jewish. They included two interviews in which he called himself “a Latino Jew,” interviews in which he variously called himself “half Jewish,” “halachically Jewish,” and “one of two Jewish Republican freshmen,” and a position paper in which he called himself a “proud American Jew.”
Santos told Morgan, “I’d always say I was raised Catholic, but I come from a Jewish family, so that makes me ‘Jewish,’ It’s always been a party favor. Everybody’s always laughed.”
This echoed the explanation he gave to the New York Post and City & State New York.
What Santos disputes that he lied about
• That he attended Horace Mann prep school, although he acknowledged not graduating because of financial difficulties. He made this claim on his campaign website, but school officials told media outlets that records show nothing about Santos ever attending.
Santos insisted to Morgan that he went there, at least briefly. “I was there for six months of ninth grade,” he said.
• That he has ancestors who fled the Holocaust. Santos told a conservative podcaster that his “grandparents survived the Holocaust.” He also tweeted that he’s “the grandson of Holocaust refugees” and said in a 2021 campaign video that his “grandparents survived the Holocaust.” His campaign website said that his mother “was born in Brazil to Belgian immigrants that fled the devastation of World War II Europe.”
However, the Forward reported that Santos’ family doesn’t “appear in Brazilian immigration cards in the 1930s or 1940s, or in the databases of Yad Vashem or the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum, which list European Jewish refugees.” Genealogist Megan Smolenyak told CNN that “there’s no sign of Jewish and/or Ukrainian heritage and no indication of name changes along the way.”
Santos has not conceded this point. “This is the one that I will battle to my grave,” Santos told Morgan. He said he is working to get DNA results that will prove his case, saying that it was common at the time for documents to have been fabricated to help people escape persecution.
• That his mother, Fatima Devolder, was in the World Trade Center’s twin towers on 9/11 and eventually died from injuries sustained that day. Santos tweeted that 9/11 “claimed my mother’s life,” and he said on a version of his campaign website that she was in her office in the South Tower on 9/11 but survived, passing away “a few years later when she lost her battle to cancer.”
Research by NBC News found only one employer of his mother in public records, from 1994 in Queens. She also worked as a nurse in Brazil, the Times reported.
Further, documents have emerged showing that Santos’ mother was in Brazil at the time of the attacks, and when she applied for a visa in 2003 to enter the U.S., she wrote that she had not been in the U.S. since 1999.
Pressed by Morgan about these discrepancies, Santos doubled down, saying it is “true” that his mother worked in the twin towers. He said he doesn’t know why no record can be found of her employment there. “I stay convinced that that’s the truth,” he said.
• That he had employees who died in the 2016 Pulse nightclub shooting in Orlando. Santos told WNYC radio that he “lost four employees” in the Pulse shooting. But the Times found that none of the 49 victims worked at any company he’s been affiliated with.
Santos stood by this claim to Morgan, saying that the media investigations so far haven’t contacted the right company. “I’m reporting based on what was reported to us that morning,” Santos said.
• That he ran an animal charity, organized as a 501(c)3 nonprofit, called Friends of Pets United that rescued 2,500 dogs and cats from 2013 to 2018. Santos made this claim in his campaign biography.
The New York Times and others have found no record of a registered charity by this name in federal or state records. The Times did find one fundraiser in 2017, but the organizer of the group that was supposed to be receiving the funds told the newspaper that she never received any money from Santos’ group.
Santos told Morgan that he can “attest” that the Times’ description of the fundraiser is “not true.”
He said he was one of seven founders of the group and was responsible for picking up animals to be rescued, not for the group’s administration.
• That he cheated a veteran with a sick dog. Richard Osthoff, a disabled U.S. Navy veteran, said in media interviews that Santos helped raise $3,000 for urgent surgery for his service dog, Sapphire, in 2016, but he never received the money and the dog died.
In response, Santos tweeted, “The reports that I would let a dog die is shocking & insane. My work in animal advocacy was the labor of love & hard work. Over the past 24hr I have received pictures of dogs I helped rescue throughout the years along with supportive messages.”
In his interview with Morgan, Santos said that he’s set up many GoFundMe pages for pets over the years and that it’s conceivable that someone else managed the page for Osthoff ’s dog using his account. However, Santos said he never had any direct involvement in the effort for Osthoff’s dog.
“I’ve never met this man,” Santos told Morgan. “I’ve made abundantly clear: I feel for him, I feel for his story. … When I read this, it hit me like a bag of bricks.” Santos said he “never took on this case and I never took the money from his dog.”
• That he’s not a criminal. Santos told the New York Post, “I am not a criminal here – not here or in Brazil or any jurisdiction in the world.”
Santos has not been convicted of any crime. However, The New York Times unearthed court records showing that Santos was charged with stealing a checkbook belonging to a man his mother was caring for and writing fraudulent checks worth $700. The case lapsed when he left the country, but after his election to Congress came to light, Brazilian prosecutors said they intended to resurrect the fraud charges.
Also, in 2017, Politico reported that a checking account in Santos’ name wrote nine canceled checks to dog breeders, writing in the memo section: “puppy” and “puppies.” This earned him the charge in Pennsylvania of theft by deception. Santos said his checkbook had been stolen and, with a friend’s help, the charge was expunged.
What Santos hasn’t addressed
• That he’s “biracial … Caucasian and Black.” In a Twitter conversation in 2020, Santos said he was biracial, specifically “Caucasian and Black.” He does not appear to have elaborated on this.
• That he trashed Goldman Sachs at a conference run by Anthony Scaramucci. SALT is a “global thought leadership and networking forum encompassing finance, technology and geopolitics” founded by Scaramucci, who briefly served in President Donald Trump’s White House.
Santos told a podcast in 2022, “Have you ever heard of a Goldman Sachs employee take the stage at the largest private equity conference in the world – SALT, run by Anthony Scaramucci – and berate their employer? Well, I did that.” Santos said he was serving on a panel about renewable energy and global warming.
Scaramucci told CNN that Santos wasn’t on any panel at the conference, and didn’t even attend. Santos does not appear to have addressed this claim any further.