Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

Fact-checking Biden’s budget speech

- Louis Jacobson Amy Sherman

President Joe Biden proposed a $6.8 trillion budget that would impose tax hikes on the wealthy to bolster Medicare’s finances and provide additional money to expand social programs.

All presidents’ budgets are merely suggested starting points for congressio­nal deliberati­on – especially now, with the opposite party controllin­g the House. But they offer a general idea of what policy accomplish­ments the White House aspires to in the year ahead. This budget could also provide hints of what Biden will campaign on if he runs for a second term.

Biden said his proposal would reduce budget deficits, produce savings on prescripti­on drug prices and help the country remain economical­ly competitiv­e with China. However, his plan didn’t address in detail how to ensure the future financial health of Social Security, although he campaigned on a promise to protect the program and has criticized Republican plans to reform it.

House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, RCalif., called Biden’s budget proposal “unserious.” Republican­s will likely unveil their own budget proposal later this spring.

The two parties’ conflicting visions for the federal budget will then set off months of debate.

Economists estimate that Congress must act by mid-August to lift the debt ceiling or the Treasury Department will run out of money.

We fact-checked several remarks Biden made March 9 as he unveiled his budget, including statements about inflation, jobs, the deficit, taxes and Medicare. We found that most of his statements required at least some additional context than he’d provided.

“We brought down inflation seven months in a row.”

This is largely accurate but needs context.

Year-over-year inflation is a common way of measuring the increase in prices; it takes the economy’s current overall price level and compares it with the price level a year earlier, to see how much higher or lower it is on a percentage basis.

Year-over-year inflation peaked in June 2022 and has fallen for the next seven months for which data exists.

The most recent year-over-year figure, 6.3%, is still far higher than the 1.4% Biden inherited when he was inaugurate­d, and higher than it was as recently as October 2021.

The current rate is also much higher than the Federal Reserve Board’s target rate of around 2%, meaning the board will continue to raise interest rates, which risks driving the economy into recession.

“I was able to create 12 million new jobs in two years, more than any president in American history has created in four years.”

He has a point, but this claim needs a bunch of asterisks.

In raw numbers, Biden did oversee greater job growth in two years than any post-World War II president’s first term in office.

However, if you measure the change in jobs by the percentage increase from the time a president took office, Biden rates in the middle of the pack among recent presidents.

And although Biden has easily outpaced every postwar president in job gains per year served in office, he has benefited from fortuitous timing: He took office on the upswing of a deep recession and has not faced a new recession yet, something that many of his predecesso­rs experience­d during their first term and that hobbled their job creation figures.

Biden’s policies, such as those on the coronaviru­s pandemic, may have helped boost national employment. However, no president is all-powerful in shaping the economy; internatio­nal economic trends and other factors also play a role.

“In my first two years in office, I brought down the deficit a record $1.7 trillion, more than any president has in American history.”

This needs context.

Biden’s administra­tion presided over smaller deficits than were seen under the Trump administra­tion. Between 2020 and 2022, the federal budget deficit – that is, revenue minus spending for the year – fell by $1.7 trillion.

But there’s an important caveat: The deficit had risen because of a temporary phase of unusual federal spending during the pandemic.

During 2020 and 2021, the federal government’s spending skyrockete­d as both the Trump and Biden administra­tions tried to ease the pandemic’s economic blow. The response from Congress and the White House included enacting stimulus payments, extending unemployme­nt insurance, institutin­g business operation grants and increasing public health spending.

Because tax revenue didn’t keep pace with spending, the deficit surged in 2020 and 2021. The deficit declined in 2022, as time-limited programs expired and as the worst of the pandemic passed, boosting tax revenue from increased employment and corporate revenue.

Also, a smaller deficit does not equal a shrinking federal debt. The federal debt is the sum of all past deficits (minus any surpluses, which there haven’t been for decades). So, any deficit, even a smaller one than previously, adds to the debt.

“Medicare finally has power now to negotiate lower drug prices.”

This is accurate, but it applies only to a small number of prescripti­ons.

Medicare is the federal health insurance program for Americans older than 65. For decades, the program has lacked the authority to negotiate drug prices, which has translated into costs that are higher than those paid by other industrial­ized nations.

The Inflation Reduction Act which passed in 2022 will allow the federal government to negotiate the price of 10 drugs in Medicare Part D, the outpatient prescripti­on drug use benefit, in 2026. In subsequent years, the number of drugs that the government could negotiate prices would rise, covering both Medicare Part D and Medicare Part B.

Biden’s budget proposal would allow Medicare to negotiate prices for more drugs.

“You know what the average tax (billionair­es) pay, federal tax? Three percent. T-H-R-E-E. Three percent. No billionair­e should be paying a lower tax than somebody working as a schoolteac­her or a firefighter or any of you in this room.”

We rated a previous version of this claim False.

Biden has previously cited an 8% tax figure for billionair­es, based on calculatio­ns by his own White House Council of Economic Advisers. But neither the 8% figure nor the 3% figure aligns with current tax policy.

To arrive at either 3% or 8%, Biden used calculatio­ns for what he thinks billionair­es should pay if they were subject to a wealth tax he’s proposing. Even though Biden said in his remarks that billionair­es “pay” that rate of federal tax, they don’t; his wealth tax proposal is theoretica­l and doesn’t govern what billionair­es actually pay today.

Under current laws, the 25 highestear­ning billionair­es paid a 16% tax rate on average, estimates show. That’s far higher than 3%.

Biden’s comparison with households of more modest means is also inaccurate. Among households earning $50,000 to $100,000 a year – the category that would include many teachers and firefighters – the vast majority paid effective tax rates of between 0% and 15%. Even the very richest billionair­es currently pay rates higher than that under today’s tax code.

Studies show that children who go to preschool “increase by nearly 50 percent the likelihood that they’ll finish high school and go on to earn a two- or four-year degree, no matter what their background is.”

This is Mostly True.

A 2018 study of the Chicago ChildParen­t Centers program by three researcher­s affiliated with the University of Minnesota supports Biden’s assertion, and experts in the field told PolitiFact their study is credible.

However, other studies of preschool programs have shown gains in college attendance, but with lower rates – 12% to 18%.

As a general pattern, experts said, the more socioecono­mically disadvanta­ged the group of students is, the bigger the boost preschool provides for future college attendance.

 ?? GETTY IMAGES ?? President Joe Biden talks about his proposed federal budget during an event at the Finishing Trades Institute on March 9 in Philadelph­ia.
GETTY IMAGES President Joe Biden talks about his proposed federal budget during an event at the Finishing Trades Institute on March 9 in Philadelph­ia.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States