Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

Winners, losers as tourney rolls on

- Nancy Armour and Lindsay Schnell USA TODAY

The Madness has come to the women’s tournament.

It’s not a 16 seed upsetting a No. 1, or a little-known school knocking off a powerhouse. It’s close, however, and it speaks volumes about the growing depth of the women’s game.

For just the fifth time since 1994, and first time since 2009, a No. 1 seed was knocked out before the Sweet 16. Eighth-seeded Ole Miss also sent topseeded Stanford to its earliest exit from the tournament since 2007.

“Just an incredible amount of gratitude,” Ole Miss coach Yolett McPheeMcCu­in said after her team’s 54-49 win. “We’ve been waiting for a big one. … For our team to do this, I’m just full of gratitude.”

There was debate whether Stanford should have been a No. 1 seed after dropping its regular-season finale and then losing in the semifinals of the Pac-12 tournament. Ole Miss also was probably underseede­d, having taken South Carolina to OT during the regular season.

Still, to see the Rebels beat Stanford – on the Cardinal’s home court, no less – shows how deep the women’s game has become. The days of the early rounds being gimmes for the top seeds are over.

Even Stanford fans have to admit that’s a good thing.

Here’s a look at the winners and losers from Day 3 of the NCAA women’s tournament:

Winners Power forwards

It was a big day for the bigs. There might as well have been a “This space belongs to” label on the paint for as monstrous as the performanc­es by LSU’s Angel Reese, Utah’s Alissa Pili and Virginia Tech’s Elizabeth Kitley were. Stanford’s loss would have been far more lopsided if not for Cameron Brink’s spectacula­r effort.

Brink had 13 rebounds and seven blocks -- three on just one play! -- and she almost single-handedly got Stanford

back into a game it trailed by 13 midway through the third quarter. But Brink didn’t get enough help offensively or, quite frankly, from Stanford’s coaching staff.

LSU had a 32-20 advantage in the paint over Michigan, and it was largely because of Reese. She had a whopping 24 rebounds, 14 of which were on the offensive glass, and six blocked shots. She scored a team-high 25 points, too in the Tigers’ 66-42 romp.

Of Pili’s 10 rebounds, none were bigger than the ones she had on Princeton’s next two possession­s after paring what had been a 13-point Utah lead to two. With Pili prowling in the paint, the Tigers couldn’t get good looks to tie or take the lead, allowing the Utes to hold of for a 63-56 win.

Kitley had a double-double – the 55th of her career, matching Virginia Tech’s all-time record. Though South Dakota State had an 8-point advantage in the paint, 38-26, it had only eight secondchan­ce points. Of Kitley’s 14 boards, nine were on the defensive glass, helping the Hokies surge to a 72-60 win.

Lauren Ebo

Despite playing at home for the first two rounds, many thought Notre Dame would be ripe for an upset given the loss of point guard Olivia Miles. Senior center Lauren Ebo had other ideas.

Ebo turned in a spectacula­r performanc­e in the Irish’s 53-48 win over 11thseeded Mississipp­i State, finishing with 10 points, 18 rebounds and five blocks in 31 minutes. Five of her 18 rebounds were offensive, none bigger than her board and puttback with 4:38 to go that gave Notre Dame the lead again. And her free throw with 35 seconds to play gave the Irish a 49-45 lead and made it a two possession game.

Virginia Tech

Welcome back to the Sweet 16, Hokies. It’s been a while.

Virginia Tech reached the second weekend of the NCAA tournament for just the second time in program history, and first since 1999, with its victory over South Dakota State.

“To be able to get this group, this program to this level is very, very special,” Hokies coach Kenny Brooks said. “It’s very gratifying to be able to get to this point.”

Losers Georgia ball handling

If you come at the queen, you best not throw away the ball.

Georgia gave Caitlin Clark and Iowa all it could handle on the Hawkeyes’ home floor, and had Iowa teetering on the brink with 2:17 to play after UGA hit a 3 to get within two, 68-66. Iowa missed its next shot and UGA had a chance to tie or take the lead — but then the Bulldogs turned it over on back-to-back-toback possession­s.

Four turnovers in the final 3:38, including those three in a row, directly correlated to UGA’s scoring drought the last 2:17 of the game and ultimately, Iowa’s 74-66 win. The second turnover in that string was the worst, as Clark turned it into two points for the Hawkeyes. Georgia finished with 18 turnovers, which Iowa turned into 17 points.

Home-court advantage

It’s understand­able why the NCAA continues playing the first two rounds at campus sites. The crowd at Cassell Coliseum was so raucous, Virginia Tech players said they could feel the building shake. The decibel level at CarverHawk­eye Arena had to have registered on a seismograp­h machine. The arenas at LSU and South Carolina were packed.

But is it fair in the NCAA tournament, when it’s lose and your season is over?

You can make the argument that Georgia would have beat Iowa if that game was played on a neutral court. Princeton might have had a better shot late against Utah if playing anywhere else. And there’s no way Stanford would have been within 10 points of Ole Miss had the game not been on the Cardinal’s home floor.

The women’s game has grown enough that the NCAA needs to consider neutral courts for all three weekends of the tournament.

 ?? JOSIE LEPE/AP ?? Mississipp­i guard Marquesha Davis (2) drives to the basket against Stanford guard Indya Nivar (12).
JOSIE LEPE/AP Mississipp­i guard Marquesha Davis (2) drives to the basket against Stanford guard Indya Nivar (12).

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States