Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

Petition filed for right to abortion

Planned Parenthood: State Constituti­on guards bodily autonomy

- Jessie Opoien

MADISON – As the future of abortion access continues to be debated, Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin announced on Thursday that it will file a petition with the state Supreme Court asking it to recognize a constituti­onal right to bodily autonomy, including abortion.

The organizati­on argues the rights declared by the state Constituti­on — “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness” — inherently include “the right to determine what one does with one’s own body, including whether and when to have a child.”

“All people in Wisconsin share that right equally,” the petition argues.

Planned Parenthood is also asking the court to recognize a right for physicians to provide abortions, arguing “life and liberty also require the right to pursue one’s lawful profession.”

“Despite all the progress that’s been made to resume abortion care since the overturnin­g of (Roe v. Wade), the protection­s afforded under Wisconsin’s Constituti­on remain unknown,” Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin president and CEO Tanya Atkinson told reporters. “Wisconsini­tes deserve the ability to make decisions that shape their future to make decisions about if or when they become a parent. And they deserve to know this right is protected by our state Constituti­on.”

The organizati­on is asking the state’s high court to take the case directly, bypassing lower courts, because “these are exigent and urgent circumstan­ces that impact the health and well-being of the people we know and care about across the state,” said Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin chief strategy officer Michelle Velasquez.

Planned Parenthood’s filing comes days after Sheboygan County District Attorney Joel Urmanski filed a petition to bypass an appeals court and ask the state Supreme Court to decide whether a December ruling from a Dane County judge declaring an 1849 law outlawing abortion does not apply to consensual procedures.

If the court agrees to take that case, it’s likely it will side with the lower court’s ruling. The court now has a 4-3 liberal majority after Justice Janet Protasiewi­cz ran for a seat on the court with a campaign focused on restoring abortion access in Wisconsin.

Attorney General Josh Kaul and Gov. Tony Evers, both Democrats, filed that lawsuit shortly after the U.S. Supreme Court in June 2022 overturned its 1973 Roe v. Wade decision, which legalized abortion nationwide. The court’s 2022 ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Care effectively put back into place the state’s original

abortion law.

Attorneys for Planned Parenthood argue that either before the court considers the case challengin­g the 1849 law, or at the same time, it should determine whether an abortion ban violates the rights laid out in the state Constituti­on “of persons who may become pregnant and of the physicians who provide care to them.”

“Even if Kaul v. Urmanski could be decided on statutory interpreta­tion, the constituti­onal issue is likely to recur,” the petition argues.

“The reason it’s so important to get an answer on the constituti­onality is because Wisconsini­tes need guardrails. They need to understand what rights are protected in their state Constituti­on, and legislator­s need guardrails as they’re thinking about … passing new laws,” Velasquez said.

Wisconsin Right to Life legislativ­e director Gracie Skogman called the move “a radical action from Planned Parenthood, that demonstrat­es their disregard for human life.”

“The Wisconsin state Constituti­on protects the right to life for all, including preborn children,” Skogman said.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States