Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

Evers considerin­g suing GOP over PFAS funding

- Laura Schulte

MADISON – Gov. Tony Evers isn’t ruling out filing a lawsuit to force Republican­s to release funding meant to help communitie­s across the state address “forever chemical” contaminat­ion.

Evers appeared alongside Democratic members of the Joint Finance Committee Tuesday morning after the Republican majority failed to show up. Evers last week called the meeting of the budget committee to release funding to address both PFAS and the lack of medical resources in the northeaste­rn portion of the state.

“The options are kicking some people out of their positions next November, or finding a judge someplace that says we need to move forward,” he said.

The governor accused the Joint Finance Committee of acting as a fourth branch of power within the state and not as just a part of the Legislatur­e.

“It seems ridiculous that we need to go to the court for relief,” Evers said. “You have an obligation to release (the funding), and it seems we are wasting time and energy of the people of Wisconsin.”

No Republican members of Joint Finance attended the meeting Tuesday morning, leaving too few in attendance to convene.

Evers called for the meeting of the committee last week, after he vetoed a bill aimed at outlining how the Department of Natural Resources could spend the $125 million PFAS “trust fund” that was set aside last year during the budget process. The governor then called for the Joint Finance Committee to instead come in for a special meeting, to release the funding and allow the agency to spend the fund without the strict guidelines contained in the vetoed legislatio­n.

If Evers had signed the bill, it would have created grant programs aimed at providing aid to communitie­s with contaminat­ion, in addition to limiting the actions that the DNR could take to address contaminat­ion or hold polluters accountabl­e.

It would have also commission­ed studies, required a reduction in costs for testing, expanded a well compensati­on grant program, and establishe­d an innocent buyer program that would

help property owners who unknowingl­y purchase land contaminat­ed with PFAS.

But environmen­tal groups, the Evers administra­tion and residents in impacted communitie­s pushed back on the Republican-authored bill, saying it would have harmed the DNR’s ability to enforce cleanup of PFAS and that it would have allowed businesses to get away with contaminat­ion.

The authors argued that the complaints were unfounded.

Eric Wimberger, R-Green Bay, who is a member of the committee, fired back in a press release, accusing Evers and Democrats for wanting to make the public pay for pollution.

“While PFAS-affected families suffer, Democrats would rather stage publicity stunts than actually listen to the needs of impacted communitie­s. The same Democrats calling for these funds to be released voted against including them in the budget,” he said. “If Democrats on the budget committee are actually serious about helping PFAS victims get clean water, I look forward to their vote to override the Governor’s veto.”

Evers called attention to the Town of Campbell, the French Island community that neighbors La Crosse, and the struggles its residents have been facing for years. Nearly all private wells on the island are contaminat­ed with PFAS and the community has relied on bottled water as they wait for a solution to be implemente­d.

“Think about the people of French Island, they’ve been messing with this for I’d say half a decade and they’re continuing to drink Culligan water,” he said. “It’s wrong. It’s wrong.”

Evers said the lack of funding might make it even harder for communitie­s to reach new standards issued by the Environmen­tal Protection Agency last week, which sets the limit for two of the most common PFAS compounds at just 4 parts per trillion, well below the current Wisconsin standards.

“Municipali­ties are already struggling with this issue,” he said. “People are drinking water they have to buy at the grocery store. And that puts immense pressure on local folks.”

PFAS will likely take billions of dollars to address in Wisconsin. In Wausau, for example, the city is spending $17 million to install a treatment system to filter PFAS in all of its wells.

“One of the most important parts of our work is our work with health and safety and we’re sitting here with no Republican­s,” Evers said. “Taking the time to do the right thing. It sucks.”

Sen. Kelda Roys, D-Madison, was one of three Democratic members of the committee who appeared for the meeting. She said the lack of interest in getting money out to PFAS-impacted communitie­s is just the latest in the line of things Republican­s want to take credit for, “without actually solving the problem.”

“This has been long-standing, many sessions in the making with PFAS,” she said. “This is a consistent pattern. There was no need to put this money in a lockbox.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States