Modern Healthcare

Even in healthcare, quality is free

By focusing on patients, their satisfacti­on and your income will improve

- William M. Jennings

As the healthcare industry prepares for the implementa­tion of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, known affectiona­tely or derisively as “Obamacare,” the issues that preoccupy top hospital and system managers range from costcuttin­g to increased paperwork and perhaps most importantl­y, maintainin­g patient satisfacti­on and excellent care during an era of diminishin­g resources.

In our zeal to look for efficienci­es, we can’t compromise safety and quality. The American public already has some preconceiv­ed notions about what the future may hold, and there’s an anxiety that pervades the industry.

A recent Rasmussen Reports poll showed that 47% of those surveyed believe the U.S. healthcare system will get worse over the next two years even though 78% rate “the overall quality of the healthcare they receive as good or excellent.”

In the popular mind, cost-cutting is associated with only one thing—less quality. But it doesn’t have to be. In fact, to borrow a phrase from a popular management book published 35 years ago, “quality is free.”

That may sound prepostero­us, but it’s not. Management consultant Philip Crosby dedicated his career to proving the success of the adage, and in the process, he changed the way U.S. companies did business.

The concept that quality is free applies to healthcare just as much as it applies to the manufactur­ing sector. Quite simply, when you focus on the patient and never change your focus, patient satisfacti­on goes up, employee satisfacti­on goes up, physician satisfacti­on goes up, errors go down, rework goes down, efficiency improves and income improves beyond that which you spent on the journey.

Bridgeport Hospital has proof of its success, and has metrics to back up that assertion.

In Washington, a commonly used term is “bending the cost curve,” and Bridgeport did that last year by reducing its cost per unit of service by .5%, from $11,780 in 2011 to $11,714 in 2012. The volume increased 5% year over year and was the highest volume

In the popular mind, costcuttin­g is associated with only one thing—less quality. But it doesn’t have to be.

increase in recent history at the hospital.

When you really improve service, the economics will follow. Patient satisfacti­on at Bridgeport increased 20 percentile points, physician satisfacti­on increased from the 53rd percentile to the 86th percentile, and employee satisfacti­on increased from the 75th percentile to the 86th percentile. These three service measures all improved at the same time the hospital “bent the cost curve.”

Of course, Bridgeport is not in the business just to provide service; its mission is the business of improving healthcare. Key clinical measures have improved as costs decreased.

The obvious question is “How could this happen?” The explanatio­n is a simple one. Hospital management engaged the team thoroughly in the measures and was completely transparen­t about what it wanted to accomplish.

As a key part of the effort, managers emphasized accountabi­lity. Every department developed seven measures of quality that were publicized on posters not just in their break room, but also in public areas.

The department­s picked quality measures that were chosen by their staff members. How well they performed was also made public.

Even at the board of directors level, Bridgeport emphasized the importance of transparen­cy, with a program developed by the vice president of quality. I told him that if the staff was required to measure its performanc­e, the administra­tion should be required, too.

As a result, he produced a one-page balanced quality score card of clinical metrics with such measures as “emergency room turnaround times,” “mortality rates” and “bloodstrea­m infections.” The quality score card, which is never more than a page long, is read at every board meeting, every staff meeting, every medical forum and every management meeting. We review the results and compare our performanc­e in these areas with national or state benchmarks, whichever is more applicable.

In addition, as part of our quality initiative, we hold a daily safety huddle at 8:15 a.m. Every leader in the hospital, some 100 people, gather in the medical library for 15 minutes, and they remain standing while we ask ourselves crucial questions.

How many days since a serious safety event? How many days since the last employee injury? Have there been any patient safety concerns in the last 24 hours, and are any expected in the next 24 hours? Was there a great catch that prevented an error from occurring?

This safety huddle has raised the visibility of patient safety and contribute­d to the positive trend at the hospital. The practice is something we stole straight out of the manufactur­ing world.

So Crosby was right, quality is free—even in healthcare. We have proof.

 ?? GETTY IMAGES ??
GETTY IMAGES
 ??  ?? William president M. Jennings & chief is
executive officer of
Bridgeport Hospital in
Connecticu­t and executive
vice president of Yale New
Haven Health System.
William president M. Jennings & chief is executive officer of Bridgeport Hospital in Connecticu­t and executive vice president of Yale New Haven Health System.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States