Modern Healthcare

‘All of a sudden, there was fire’

- By Joe Carlson and Sabriya Rice

It was a chaotic scene in the operating room just moments before a critically ill patient at FirstHealt­h Moore Regional Hospital burst into flames. There was “lots of confusion,” a surgical technician later told hospital inspectors.

The patient who arrived at the emergency department in Pinehurst, N.C., in June 2013 needed an immediate tracheosto­my. His grossly swollen tongue from an allergic reaction was preventing him from breathing. A surgeon was summoned from another operating room.

The surgeon “was standing there with knife in hand and he says, ‘Somebody prep the patient,’” according to a CMS report on the incident. As blood gushed from the neck incision, the surgeon deployed an electric cauterizin­g tool. It ignited the alcohol-based disinfecta­nt used at the incision site, leaving the patient with second-degree burns on his neck and shoulders.

Officials at the 379-bed hospital told inspectors that fire-prevention policies were in place. Yet that initial scramble in the operating room, as described in the report, led to violations of several well-establishe­d best practices for safe-equipment use to prevent surgical fires. They are included in the Preventing Surgical Fires Initiative, which has been aggressive­ly pushed by the Food and Drug Administra­tion for the past three years.

The hospital has since strengthen­ed its fire-safety rules, including banning alcohol sterilizer­s in most emergency procedures. The surgical team “responded to the incident appropriat­ely” and finished the operation after putting out the fire, FirstHealt­h of the Carolinas CEO David Kilarski said in a statement.

Despite a slew of news accounts about patients being set on fire in operating rooms across the country, adoption of precaution­ary measures has been slow, often implemente­d only after a hospital experience­s an accident. Advocates say it’s not clear how many hospitals have instituted the available protocols, and no national safety authority tracks the frequency of surgical fires, which are thought to injure patients in one of every three incidents. About 240 surgical fires occur every year, according to rough estimates by the ECRI Institute, a notfor-profit organizati­on that conducts research on patient-safety issues. But fires may be underrepor­ted because of fear of litigation or bad publicity.

“Virtually all surgical fires are preventabl­e,” said Mark Bruley, vice president of accident and forensic investigat­ion for ECRI, which has been tracking operating-room fires for 30 years. He blames the persistenc­e of the problem on the slow migration of best practices across the hospital industry.

Five months after the FirstHealt­h fire, disinfecta­nt manufactur­er CareFusion warned doctors and hospitals to stop using electrosur­gical tools near some of its alcohol-based cleansers. Experts warned that these tools should not be used around purified oxygen, which ignites quickly in concentrat­ions above 35%. Surgical teams should also drape extra towels to prevent pooling of the flammable materials, and follow FirstHealt­h’s own policy to have saline water available during procedures with high fire risk.

Several of these protocols were violated at FirstHealt­h, according to inspection reports. A nurse not only administer­ed an alcohol-based skin cleanser, but the person administer­ing the anesthesia began the patient with 100% oxygen. The electrocau­tery tool was used without waiting the recommende­d three minutes for the alcohol to dry, state investigat­ors were told.

“All of a sudden, there was fire,” the anesthetis­t told hospital inspectors who investigat­ed the fire. “Fire was going up my arm, and I began patting out the fire on myself.” Meanwhile, the surgeon patted out the flames covering the patient’s neck and shoulders.

The steady incidence of surgicalro­om fires alarms safety experts and advocates. “They should never happen,” said Lisa McGiffert, director of the Safe Patient Project at the Consumers Union. The group supports mandatory reporting of severe patient safety events.

In addition to the FDA initiative, similar public-awareness campaigns have been launched by the National Quality Forum, the Joint Commission, the Anesthesia Patient Safety Foundation and by patient advocate Catherine Reuter, founder of surgicalfi­re.org. While anecdotal evidence suggests the number of surgical fires has declined in recent years, it hasn’t stilled calls to action.

“The FDA has been committed since

2010 to working in collaborat­ion with public and private organizati­ons to reduce the occurrence of surgical fires, preventabl­e events that can be disfigurin­g and even fatal for the patients involved,” an FDA spokeswoma­n said. The agency is working with a coalition of 28 groups to raise awareness.

Most surgical fires involve the ignition of concentrat­ed oxygen by electrosur­gical tools used in upper-body procedures, where patients receive the highly flammable gas through face masks and nasal devices. But a growing number are linked to the ignition of alcohol-based antiseptic­s.

Last November, the FDA allowed CareFusion, the maker of popular alcohol-based antiseptic ChloraPrep, to change the antiseptic’s label to warn that some versions of the cleanser should not be used near electrosur­gery tools. The labels on other formulatio­ns now call for allowing longer drying times before using electrosur­gery tools.

Solid numbers on the incidence of operating-room fires do not exist. ECRI’s latest estimate of 240 operating-room fires each year between 2004 to 2011 was revised down from earlier estimates of 650 fires a year between 2004 to 2007.

While that suggests there has been improvemen­t, studies of anesthesia malpractic­e claims suggest there’s been a rise in incidents. “There is an inherent problem in preventing relatively rare events,” said Dr. John Clarke, clinical director of the Pennsylvan­ia Patient Safety Authority. People think “it is not likely to happen to you in particular,” he said.

As one of the few states to aggressive­ly push hospitals to adopt best safety practices, Pennsylvan­ia officials say their public-awareness campaign is getting results. “As these things become more known, people can appreciate that this is an ideal opportunit­y to learn from someone else’s mistake,” Clarke said.

The FDA and the Joint Commission maintain public reports of surgical fires, but they are based on voluntary patient complaints that are not representa­tive of epidemiolo­gical trends. Modern Healthcare identified a dozen such incidents in public hospital-inspection reports.

In July 2012, for example, a surgical team at 325-bed Riverside Medical Center in Kankakee, Ill., burned a surgical outpatient’s face, hand and shoulders during a surgery to remove a forehead lesion. In February 2012, a patient at the 47-bed Fairview Lakes Medical Center in Wyoming, Minn., who was receiving a pacemaker, was burned on the head, neck and hand after an electrosur­gical tool ignited oxygen in a tube, allowing the fire to spread to the surgical mask.

In 2009 and 2010, the 1,268bed Cleveland Clinic had a series of operating-room fires that left three patients with burns that hospital inspectors said were caused by setting alcohol-based antiseptic­s on fire. Each situation triggered a severe “immediate jeopardy” warning that led to extensive staff training on fire preven- tion. Officials with each hospital declined to comment on the fires.

Experts say the most common ignition source is a class of electrosur­gical tools commonly called “bovie” pens, named for their inventor William T. Bovie. The electric tools are used in place of traditiona­l metal scalpels in more than 80% of all surgeries because they are more convenient, and can be used to cauterize wounds during surgery. The Bovie Surgical Corp., which manufactur­es a line of bovie pens, warns its products pose a fire or explosion hazard if used in the presence of flammable materials.

Many of the best fire-safety practices developed in recent years stem from the work at Christiana Care Health System, Newark, Del., after two patients caught fire in operating rooms within eight months in 2003.

They pioneered their own process, which involves discussing the risk of fire during the scheduled time-out before surgery. The hospital hasn’t burned a patient since.

Protocols like Christiana’s have been widely disseminat­ed. Yet, Christiana says it still get calls several times a month from hospitals that are just starting to implement a system. “It’s a bit of an uphill slog,” said Dr. Kenneth Silverstei­n, chairman of Christiana’s department of anesthesio­logy. “The bottom line is, in order to have a culture of safety in your institutio­n, you have to get people behind it.”

 ??  ?? ECRI Institute conducted laboratory tests to explore the risk of fire in oxygenenri­ched environmen­ts. As oxygen concentrat­ions increase, so does fire risk. This image, taken during an experiment, does not depict an actual patient.
ECRI Institute conducted laboratory tests to explore the risk of fire in oxygenenri­ched environmen­ts. As oxygen concentrat­ions increase, so does fire risk. This image, taken during an experiment, does not depict an actual patient.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States