Modern Healthcare

The tough terrain of transparen­t pricing

- By Harris Meyer

Scott Powder, Advocate Health Care’s chief strategy officer, had a frustratin­g experience trying to price shop for an MRI for his daughter. That’s part of what led him to embark on a two-year effort to make his system’s pricing simpler and more transparen­t for consumers.

“We’ve made a lot of progress, but every time you take two steps forward, you often have to take a half-step back,” Powder said.

Last year, Advocate unveiled flat prices on certain services for self-pay patients at its 56 urgent-care clinics located at Walgreens stores and at its Advocate Medical Group outpatient centers in the Chicago area.

The Downers Grove, Ill.-based system is charging $60 for children’s physicals for sports teams or camp, and $70 for adult physicals for employment or life insurance. It’s charging $89 for treatment by a nurse practition­er of 30 common illnesses and injuries such as earaches, respirator­y infections and urinary tract infections. The system previously based charges on the services delivered in each case and the site of service.

Now Advocate is working on extending the fixed-price policy to diagnostic-imaging procedures, combining the facility and profession­al charges into one unified price. A small but growing number of health systems are thinking “more like retailers” and establishi­ng clear pricing strategies to compete for consumers who face rising out-of-pocket costs under high-deductible health plans, according to a report from the PwC Health Research Institute.

“That’s what retail organizati­ons have been doing forever, offering a constant price that’s attractive in the marketplac­e,” said Joe Fifer, CEO of the Healthcare Financial Management Associatio­n. “We haven’t had to do that in healthcare because we haven’t been a consumer-facing industry. That has to change.”

Advocate analyzed 35 different reasons people would come in for sick care and what the system would bill insur- ance or what people would pay out of pocket. The ballpark figure it came up with was $89. “We might lose a few dollars on a strep test, but it should have a neutral effect,” Powder said.

Advocate has received positive feedback from patients about the option to pay the fixed price out of pocket rather than billing insurance. But so far only about 10% of patients in the Walgreens clinics and Advocate Medical Group centers have taken advantage of it. “I don’t know why they’re still defaulting to insurance,” Powder said. “It may be that’s what they’re used to.”

Another leader on price transparen­cy is Toledo, Ohio-based ProMedica, which recently launched an online tool that estimates patients’ out-ofpocket cost for the hospital part of lab, radiology and surgery services. It was driven at least partly by a new state law that was scheduled to take effect this month but has been delayed. It will require providers to offer consumers a good-faith estimate of the amount the provider will charge the patient’s health plan, the amount the plan intends to pay and the difference, if any, that the patient must pay.

Using ProMedica’s new online price estimator, consumers enter their name, the procedure they seek, their insurance company and their policy ID number. The tool considers ProMedica’s contracted rate with that insurer, along with the patient’s coinsuranc­e and current deductible status, and provides an out-of-pocket cost estimate.

ProMedica has been working on its price transparen­cy and strategic pricing initiative in partnershi­p with the Advisory Board and other health systems including BJC HealthCare, Carolinas Healthcare System and Baylor Scott & White Health. The collaborat­ion has helped the systems more quickly figure out what works and what doesn’t.

One big challenge is obtaining realtime informatio­n from health plans. “We’re in the position of not having perfect informatio­n about whether the patient has met out-of-pocket maximums,” said Jered Wilson, ProMedica’s vice president for reimbursem­ent.

Another issue is that ProMedica’s estimate reflects only facility fees and not profession­al fees, which are billed separately by physicians. “It could be a disaster if the patient doesn’t know the profession­al fee, but this is a work in progress,” said Doug Bush, ProMedica’s associate vice president for strategic planning.

The system hopes to expand the number of services for which patients can receive online estimates, looking first at other “shoppable” services such as physical therapy.

While Advocate’s and ProMedica’s initiative­s are encouragin­g, the HFMA’s Fifer voiced frustratio­n at the sluggish movement on price transparen­cy. “We’ve demonstrat­ed as an industry that we’re not moving as fast as the consumer side of things, with higher deductible­s and copays,” he said. “I wish I knew the silver bullet.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States