Modern Healthcare

Size might not matter when it comes to health system performanc­e

- By Alex Kacik

BIGGER ISN’T necessaril­y better.

New data from Navigant Consulting challenge the common perception that scale will improve healthcare providers’ operations. The report, which covered 104 highly rated health systems representi­ng about half of nation’s hospitals, showed that there was no correlatio­n between higher revenue and better operating margins from 2015 to 2017.

The largest for-profit systems had steeper declines in operating income than their smaller peers, granted they started with much higher revenue. The data conflict with some of the rationale that drives the speeding train of mergers and acquisitio­ns, said Jeff Goldsmith, national adviser for Navigant.

“There is no relationsh­ip at all between profitabil­ity and the size of the system,” Goldsmith said, adding that most of the health systems analyzed had AA and A credit ratings. “This flies in the face of the convention­al wisdom that has driven mergers.”

Some that did the worst were roll-ups, in which small struggling systems were acquired by bigger ones that wanted to dominate a market, Goldsmith added.

Two-thirds of the systems analyzed experience­d operating income declines over the three-year period. Health system operating margins dropped by 38.7% from 2015 to 2017. Not-for-profit system margins fell 34%, while for-profit system margins dropped 39%. More than a quarter lost money on operations in at least one of the three years, and 11% had negative margins throughout.

Hospitals’ expenses grew 3 percentage points faster than their revenue, leading to a combined $6.8 billion erosion of earnings, a 44% reduction. Top-line operating revenue growth fell from 7% (2015 to 2016) to only 5.5% from (2016 to 2017). “Overhead should go down as percentage of operations when you merge, but that isn’t necessaril­y the case,” Goldsmith said.

Executives argue that scale is necessary in today’s environmen­t to drive more efficient, cost-effective operations. Bundling purchasing, attracting more physicians and patients, spreading risk, and better coordinati­ng care across the continuum require more capital and control of a diverse array of services and assets, they say.

But policy experts counter that the primary interest is padding profit margins. It’s difficult for insurers to survive without the dominant provider. They use that leverage through offering allor-nothing contracts that inflate healthcare prices, economists contend. “I think there is a gap between these proposed nine-figure ‘synergies’ and the realistic outcomes,” Goldsmith said.

A number of health systems have had buyer’s remorse, particular­ly when acquired hospitals don’t align with the systems’ overall strategy, said Thomas Fahey, partner at the law firm Nixon Peabody. They can also run into technology and data-sharing issues that can lead to inconsiste­nt referral pat- terns, take on managed-care contracts that don’t yield the expected bargaining leverage, and fail to gain market share in competitiv­e markets, he said.

Still, there is plenty of momentum for mergers and acquisitio­ns, “a lot of which is being driven by the weariness of the independen­t hospital,” Fahey said.

While operating margins waned, investment returns covered up a number of operating losses in 2017. That makes for a precarious dynamic subject to the whims of the broader economy.

Weakening demand for inpatient and surgery services has led to tighter margins. Waning reimbursem­ent for commercial­ly insured patients in states that didn’t expand Medicaid, reductions in Medicare payments due to the Affordable Care Act, and the failure of “value-based” contracts to deliver enough patients to offset steep upfront discounts for insurers also contribute­d to deteriorat­ing balance sheets, according to the report.

For instance, hospital losses in treating Medicare patients rose from $20.1 billion in 2010 to $48.8 billion in 2016, according to American Hospital Associatio­n analyses.

“The industry is in a vulnerable position right now politicall­y and economical­ly, and it is the challenge of management and boards to do something constructi­ve about it,” Goldsmith said. “If they picked all the low-hanging-fruit, maybe they need to

● get a ladder.”

 ?? Source: Navigant Consulting ??
Source: Navigant Consulting
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States