Modern Healthcare

Private equity-backed dermatolog­y groups got COVID-19 small-biz loans

- By Rachel Cohrs

THE COMPLEX BUSINESS structure of some private equity-backed dermatolog­y groups allowed them to receive millions in COVID-19 relief funds intended for small businesses, federal disclosure­s reveal.

Lawmakers and regulators structured the Paycheck Protection Program so that most private equity-owned businesses would not qualify. Only companies with 500 employees or fewer are eligible for the program, which offers loan forgivenes­s if the loans are spent on qualifying expenses.

If a business is majority owned by a private equity firm, the employees of all the firm’s portfolio companies count toward its total employee tally, thus disqualify­ing many companies.

However, a variety of factors have allowed some dermatolog­y groups backed by private equity to receive millions in forgivable loans.

At least six dermatolog­y groups that received publicly disclosed PPP loans are private equity-backed:

n

DermCare Management, which has 32 practices in California, Florida and Texas, is backed by Hildred Capital Management and Gemini Investors.

n

Soderstrom Dermatolog­y Center, which is part of a group that has eight offices in Illinois and Iowa, is backed by HIG Growth Partners.

n

Oliver Street Dermatolog­y Management is the parent management company of U.S. Dermatolog­y Partners, which has more than 94 offices across the country, and is backed by Abry Partners.

n

Sanova Dermatolog­y Management, which has

13 offices in Louisiana and Texas, is backed by

Spindletop Capital.

n

California Skin Institute Intermedia­te Holdings, which has 44 offices in California, is backed by Goldman Sachs.

n

United Skin Specialist­s, which has 10 offices in the Midwest, is backed by Tonka Bay Equity Partners.

Combined, the companies received $16 million to $34 million in forgivable PPP loans. The Small Business Administra­tion publicly disclosed names of PPP loan recipients who borrowed more than $150,000.

Private equity funds that invest in healthcare lobbied hard in the spring to try to remove rules requiring affiliated practices to count toward the employee threshold, but lawmakers and regulators ignored their pleas. As a result of the rules, many physician practices owned by hospitals didn’t qualify for PPP loans, healthcare policy analyst Paul Keckley said.

However, state regulation­s on physician practices and regulatory exceptions opened up workaround­s for practices with relationsh­ips to private equity firms.

Many states have corporate practice of medicine laws that prohibit corporatio­ns from directly employing physicians. Physician practices backed by private equity may retain their ownership, but then contract with a private equity-owned management services organizati­on. In that arrangemen­t, the physician practice itself wouldn’t necessaril­y be owned by the private equity firm even if a financial relationsh­ip with a private equity-owned management services organizati­on exists.

“Many private equity-backed groups utilize the management services organizati­on to circumvent corporate practice of medicine laws and structure relationsh­ips with physician practices. Depending on how these relationsh­ips are structured, a private equity-backed group may be able to navigate the SBA’s affiliatio­n rules and secure a PPP loan under the CARES Act,” said Dr. Sailesh Konda, a dermatolog­ist at the University of Florida who has studied acquisitio­n of dermatolog­y practices.

PPP loans are most useful to entities with high payroll costs, as a certain

percentage of the loan has to go toward salaries in order for it to be forgiven.

Some small private equity firms may not face barriers with affiliatio­n rules if the sum of their portfolio companies’ employees is fewer than 500 people.

There are also other affiliatio­n rule exceptions that dermatolog­y groups have used. For example, Hildred Capital Management acquired a 64% equity stake in DermCare Management in October 2019, making it a majority owner of the dermatolog­y-focused physician practice management company. DermCare still qualified for the PPP loan, however, because the company obtained a separate investment from a licensed small business investment company. The Coronaviru­s Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act, the law that created the PPP, states that any business that receives financial assistance from a small business investment company is exempt from the affiliatio­n rules.

The California Skin Institute has a minority investment from Goldman Sachs, according to the group’s website, so the group may not have counted as affiliated with other portfolio investment­s. A spokespers­on for California Skin Institute said the company is made up of a medical group and a separate management company, and Goldman Sachs provided a loan to the management company that did not give Goldman Sachs equity ownership, board seats or control over the medical practice or business operations.

“CSI’s PPP applicatio­n was compliant with all regulation­s and was a critical lifeline that preserved 390 essential workers’ jobs,” the spokespers­on said.

U.S. Dermatolog­y Partners declined to comment on its capital structure. The other groups didn’t respond to a request for comment.

The SBA states that affiliatio­n rules apply to private equity-owned companies just like other businesses. It can

● review a PPP loan at any time.

“Many private equityback­ed groups utilize the management services organizati­on to circumvent corporate practice of medicine laws and structure relationsh­ips with physician practices.” Dr. Sailesh Konda, a dermatolog­ist at the University of Florida

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States