Modern Healthcare

Campaign spending skewed toward Democrats

- — Rachel Cohrs

A greater share of hospitals’ and nursing homes’ political contributi­ons have gone to Democrats in 2020 than in recent election cycles, according to campaign finance disclosure­s.

Spending favoring Democrats comes as polls show they are likely to hold the House of Representa­tives and have a fighting chance to take the Senate. But big provider lobbying groups have also spent on behalf of candidates in both parties positioned to gain power, and for some candidates who are physicians.

Overall, hospitals and nursing homes have spent $81.7 million in the 2020 election cycle, and 70% of total candidate contributi­ons went to Democrats, according to the Center for Responsive Politics’ OpenSecret­s tool. That’s a significan­tly higher percentage than in previous cycles: 58% went to Democrats in 2018, and 52% in 2016.

The Greater New York Hospital Associatio­n was by far the biggest spender with $9 million contribute­d almost entirely to Democrats, followed by Mass General Brigham—formerly Partners HealthCare—with $1.7 million and the American Hospital Associatio­n with $1.3 million.

In the presidenti­al race, the healthcare provider sector gave former Vice President Joe Biden $12.6 million compared with $4.3 million to President Donald Trump.

Twelve of the top 20 Senate candidates receiving donations from hospitals and nursing homes this cycle were Democrats in competitiv­e races.

Besides directly contributi­ng to candidates, political groups also spend independen­tly on candidates’ behalf.

The American Hospital Associatio­n has spent in support of several strategica­lly important candidates of both parties. The AHA spent $400,000 for Sen. Gary Peters (D-Mich.), who holds one of two Senate seats that Democrats are in danger of losing this cycle.

The AHA also invested in two races of House members who are likely to gain more power in

2021: Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.), a contender to become chair of the

House Appropriat­ions Committee, and Rep. Fred Upton (R-Mich.), who is next in line of seniority to be ranking member of the House Energy & Commerce Committee after the retirement of Rep. Greg Walden (R-Ore.).

The nation’s biggest hospital associatio­n also gave House Ways & Means Chair Richard Neal (D-Mass.) a nearly $500,000 boost during a tough primary fight against a progressiv­e challenger. Neal has pushed hospitals’ policy priorities during the debate on banning surprise medical bills.

Neal also got $43,000 from the American College of Radiology. The group donated $25,000 to Rep. Ben Ray Lujan (D-N.M.), who fought for an arbitratio­n mechanism hospitals supported to be added to surprise billing legislatio­n.

The American Medical Associatio­n spent $325,000 to support Democratic House candidate Dr. Cameron Webb, a general internist who serves as the director of health policy and equity at the University of Virginia’s School of Medicine. He previously served in the Obama White House and was a legislativ­e extern for the AMA in 2011. Webb is running for a seat currently held by a Republican, and prominent election handicappe­r Cook Political Report gave the race its most competitiv­e rating.

In a similar move, the American College of Emergency Physicians spent $30,000 to support Dr. Rich McCormick, a Republican House candidate in Georgia for an open seat currently held by the GOP. McCormick is an emergency department doctor, and his campaign website says he views socialism as “the next fight facing America.” McCormick is facing tougher odds, as Cook Political Report rated the race as leaning in favor of Democrats. Campaign finance data cited is current as of Oct. 28.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States