Modern Healthcare

How to achieve health equity on a population scale

-

While U.S. health systems strive to offer quality care, systemic inequities perpetuate challenges that cannot be ignored. During a Nov. 2 webinar, four expert panelists — Tomi Ogundimu, Vice President of Research and Education at The Health Management Academy; Dr. Ann-Gel S. Palermo, Chief Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Officer in Education and Research for the Office for Diversity & Inclusion at Mount Sinai Health System; Dr. Tshaka Cunningham, Co-founder and Chief Scientific Officer of Polaris Genomics and Executive Director of Faith-based Genetic Research Institute; and Emily Richmond, Strategic Advisor for Helix — discussed possible solutions for tackling health inequities, including how population genomics could help support more equitable community health.

1 Health equity means ensuring everyone benefits

Representa­tion is critically lacking in research, science and other areas of medicine, causing certain communitie­s to be excluded from the benefits of innovation. However, with the rise of population genomics, there is significan­t potential to actually achieve system-wide goals of improving diversity, equity and inclusion. By improving representa­tion in research and genomics, healthcare can effectivel­y serve the broader population with preventati­ve healthcare learnings.

2 Inaction is not an option

For health systems, the consequenc­es of failing to address research inequities include furthering discrepant mortality rates, higher costs from increased rates of avoidable readmissio­ns, and missed revenue because staff are too overwhelme­d to accommodat­e patient volumes. Therefore, health systems must advocate for conducting research and collecting data in ways that are much more representa­tive of the entire population.

3 Acknowledg­ing history is a starting point

Healthcare’s first challenge regarding health equity is grasping the legacy of scientific racism. While disparitie­s were further illuminate­d by the pandemic, racism has long been deeply embedded in research norms and practices. The ideas of racial superiorit­y and inferiorit­y have manifested in metrics, tools, methods of study design and more. Ultimately, these systemic issues contribute to premature illness and death among diverse communitie­s.

Health systems can begin to advance health equity by auditing their own representa­tion gaps, calling out inequities for what they are, and investigat­ing ways in which they might be perpetuate­d, intentiona­lly or unintentio­nally. Once gaps are identified, goals for improvemen­t should be identified and clearly measured for optimizati­on, progress and accountabi­lity.

4 Leadership must help drive change

To elevate health equity, it’s important to appoint leaders at the board and C-suite levels who will be held accountabl­e for progress. These leaders need to be willing to embrace disruption but also prepared for the emotional nature of conversati­ons about racism and bias in the scientific learning community. While difficult, these conversati­ons are necessary to build trust in communitie­s that have been harmed in the past. Beyond active leadership advocacy, ongoing progress will require organizati­ons to have clear short and long-term goals, a designated budget, and dedicated resources and staff.

5 Health systems must actively engage communitie­s

It is vital to include diverse communitie­s in all levels of research by authentica­lly providing relevant opportunit­ies through targeted community outreach that meets people where they are, leveraging community organizati­ons and leaders that they trust. Rather than expecting historical­ly marginaliz­ed communitie­s to participat­e, researcher­s and healthcare advocates must engage community

members in the conversati­on. With better understand­ing of which population­s have historical­ly been excluded from or fearful of genetic testing and why, healthcare providers and ambassador­s can focus on personally communicat­ing the benefits of community health research programs and how they can not only impact each individual’s health, but also the future health of their family and generation­s to come.

Due to varying levels of health literacy, it is important that messaging remains simple and digestible. This could be supported by engaging a local community advisory board, or hiring external consultant groups with expertise in more customized messaging.

Ultimately, whether it be ongoing health initiative­s or making genetic screening more accessible, nothing that impacts specific communitie­s should be done without the involvemen­t of the people within those communitie­s. And conversely, health benefits that are offered to one community, should be offered to all communitie­s.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States