Monterey Herald

It’ll be great to have a home team I can cheer for again

- Eugene Robinson

Apparently “never” means “immediatel­y” if enough money is at stake: The racist name and logo of the Washington, D.C., National Football League franchise are finally being ditched. Hail to the Fill-InThe-Blanks! And shame on team owner Daniel M. Snyder for stubbornly holding out so long.

The name “Redskins” was always racist. It is understand­able -- though not, by any means, excusable -- that many fans of the team did not recognize this obvious fact decades ago. I include myself in the indictment. As a society, we were inured to seeing cartoonish and insulting Native American imagery exploited by sports teams at every level. I loved going to games at old, raucous RFK Stadium and cheering the team to victory, especially against the hated Dallas Cowboys.

I like to believe that if I had paused to reflect about the name back then, if I had realized it was the same as calling the team, say, the “Washington Darkies” or the “Washington Chinamen,” I’d have felt the requisite outrage. But I didn’t stop to think -- until roughly two decades ago, when my Washington Post colleague Courtland Milloy started writing passionate­ly about the issue. The scales fell from my eyes.

Not from Snyder’s, though. He bought the team in 1999, acquiring a franchise that had been the very last in the league to drop a whites-only policy and put African American players on the field. He could have started fresh with a new name and logo. But the old racist branding was part of the asset Snyder had just purchased, and while he has been an abysmal owner in terms of the team’s performanc­e, he has been relentless­ly successful at fattening his own bottom line.

Snyder took an adamant and unwavering position, declaring in 2013: “We’ll never change the name. It’s that simple. NEVER -you can use caps.”

Contrast that with the statement the team issued Monday morning: “On July 3rd, we announced the commenceme­nt of a thorough review of the team’s name. That review has begun in earnest. As part of this process, we want to keep our sponsors, fans and community apprised of our thinking as we go forward. Today, we are announcing we will be retiring the Redskins name and logo upon completion of this review.”

What made Snyder launch that effort on July 3? Perhaps the fact that one day earlier the team’s most visible corporate sponsor, FedEx Corp. -which holds the naming rights for the team’s home stadium, FedEx Field -- requested that the team’s name be changed. How could Snyder’s purported “thorough review” produce a result so quickly? Perhaps the “process” gained speed because FedEx’s demand was echoed by other major sponsors, including PepsiCo, Nike and Bank of America.

The fact that a billionair­e has been forced to change the name of a business employing a bunch of millionair­es is hardly the most important consequenc­e of the social justice movement that erupted after the killing of George Floyd. But it is far from trivial.

As I have pointed out before, symbols matter because they reflect a society’s values; if we are serious about diversity and inclusion, and if we truly believe that all men and women are created equal, there can be no tolerance for a name that insults Native Americans with a racial slur. And in the business world, such racist symbology affects monetary value as well; in 2020, the brand Aunt Jemima reduces the value of her pancake mix, just as Uncle Ben lessens the value of his “converted rice,” whatever that is.

The racist name and logo of

Snyder’s team have been hurting the value of the franchise for years, though in ways difficult to measure. The economics of the NFL make it nearly impossible for an owner to actually lose money. But television and radio sportscast­ers have been struggling with the name -- whether to use it or somehow contrive to avoid it. And home games have witnessed a phenomenon that was once unimaginab­le: rows of empty seats.

Most fans who stayed away were probably protesting the team’s lousy play or the insultingl­y high concession prices. But at least one fan -- that would be me -- stopped going to games because of the name.

It will be great to have a home team I can cheer for once again. I’ll just be rooting for the players, though, not the owner. Snyder has reluctantl­y agreed to abandon a racial slur that Native American leaders began lobbying against in 1972. “Better late than never” is nothing to be proud of.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States