Monterey Herald

Panel: China, WHO should have acted quicker to stop pandemic

- By Maria Cheng and Jamey Keaten

A panel of experts commission­ed by the World Health Organizati­on has criticized China and other countries for not moving to stem the initial outbreak of the coronaviru­s earlier and questioned whether the U.N. health agency should have labeled it a pandemic sooner.

In a report issued to the media Monday, the panel led by former Liberian President Ellen Johnson Sirleaf and former New Zealand Prime Minister Helen Clark, said there were “lost opportunit­ies” to set up basic public health measures as early as possible.

“What is clear to the panel is that public health measures could have been applied more forcefully by local and national health authoritie­s in China in January,” it said.

China’s Foreign Ministry spokespers­on Hua Chunying disputed whether China had reacted too slowly.

“As the first country to sound the global alarm against the epidemic, China made immediate and decisive decisions,” she said, pointing out that Wuhan — where the first human cases were identified — was locked down within three weeks of the outbreak starting.

“All countries, not only China, but also the U.S., the U.K., Japan or any other countries, should all try to do better,” Hua said.

At a press briefing on Tuesday, Johnson Sirleaf said it was up to countries whether they wanted to overhaul WHO to accord it more authority to stamp out outbreaks, saying the organizati­on was also constraine­d by its lack of funding.

“The bottom line is WHO has no powers to enforce anything,” she said. “All it can do is ask to be invited in.”

Last week, an internatio­nal team of WHO-led scientists arrived in Wuhan to research the animal origins of the pandemic after months of political wrangling to secure China’s approval for the probe.

The panel also cited evidence of cases in other countries in late January, saying public health containmen­t measures should have been put in place immediatel­y in any country with a likely case, adding: “They were not.”

The experts also wondered why WHO did not declare a global public health emergency — its highest warning for outbreaks — sooner. The U.N. health agency convened its emergency committee on Jan. 22, but did not characteri­ze the emerging pandemic as an internatio­nal emergency until a week later.

“One more question is whether it would have helped if WHO used the word pandemic earlier than it did,” the panel said.

WHO did not describe the COVID-19 outbreak as a pandemic until March 11, weeks after the virus had begun causing explosive outbreaks in numerous continents, meeting WHO’s own definition for a flu pandemic.

As the coronaviru­s began spreading across the globe, WHO’s top experts disputed how infectious the virus was, saying it was not as contagious as flu and that people without symptoms only rarely spread the virus. Scientists have since concluded that COVID-19 transmits even quicker than the flu and that a significan­t proportion of spread is from people who don’t appear to be sick.

 ?? THE ASSOCIATED PRESS ?? On Jan. 22, 2020, Health Officials in hazmat suits wait at the gate to check body temperatur­es of passengers arriving from the city of Wuhan at the airport in Beijing, China.
THE ASSOCIATED PRESS On Jan. 22, 2020, Health Officials in hazmat suits wait at the gate to check body temperatur­es of passengers arriving from the city of Wuhan at the airport in Beijing, China.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States