Monterey Herald

Marrying couple masters the art of asking

- — Disgusted

DEAR AMY » My son and his girlfriend just announced their plans to marry this year. It is the first marriage for both of them and we couldn't be happier.

We were very surprised, however, when they asked us what contributi­on we would make toward the wedding.

I had always understood that wedding expenses were the responsibi­lity of the bride's family, and said so, but they said that was an “out-of-date” custom.

We were blindsided and don't know how to respond.

Her family is generously giving them a healthy sum to use for wedding, honeymoon, etc. This should be more than enough to cover the wedding costs.

We will host the rehearsal dinner (a traditiona­l groom's family responsibi­lity) and plan on giving them a nice check for a wedding gift (but not as much as the bride's contributi­on).

A couple of years ago, we gave our son most of the down payment on the house they now live in together and feel we have done our share already. That gift was roughly double the funds the bride's family is giving.

Are we hopelessly out of date?

How do we manage their expectatio­ns without causing ill-feelings?

— Dated Parents DEAR PARENTS » The marrying couple should be responsibl­e for financing their wedding. One way to do this is to ask both sets of parents to contribute and then to plan for the wedding they can afford.

Your son and his fiancée may seem especially bold when it comes to the “asking,” but that's all they are doing — they are asking.

All they need from you is an answer: “In addition to the sum we gave you for your down payment, we'll pay for the rehearsal dinner. We were also planning to give you a check for [name the amount] as a wedding gift, and if you would like it now rather than later, let us know.”

This couple is responsibl­e for managing their own expectatio­ns. This is “adulting” of the first order.

DEAR AMY » Your response to grandpa bringing his grandkids cookies when he watches them, was ridiculous.

You completely attacked his character, saying he's lazy and implying that he may exert his “power” in other ways.

That was over the top and a bit dramatic.

Don't be so lazy with the name-calling.

DEAR DISGUSTED » This grandfathe­r's choice was to ignore the explicit wishes of the children's parents. So yes, he seemed like a lazy and disrespect­ful caregiver.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States